{"id":111,"date":"2026-05-29T13:44:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-29T13:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111"},"modified":"2026-05-29T13:44:00","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T13:44:00","slug":"the-supreme-courts-common-sense-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u201cCommon sense\u201d reasoning is becoming more common at the Supreme Court. The justices have explicitly relied on common sense to underwrite its holdings in several salient areas of law. And commentators are beginning to seize on that trend.<\/p>\n

Read more Jury duty for a justice<\/a><\/p>\n

Some examples<\/strong><\/p>\n

Major questions and tariffs<\/em><\/p>\n

The most striking recent example of the commonsense turn is the tariffs case, Learning Resources v. Trump<\/em>. As one of us described the key facts last month:<\/p>\n

[Learning Resources<\/em>] featured not just debate over the major questions doctrine but also dozens of references to \u201ccommon sense\u201d or \u201ccommonsense,\u201d even though the case featured a 6\u20133 lineup and seven sharply divergent opinions. Many of these uses of \u201ccommon sense\u201d did not reflect the plain meaning of statutory terms but instead represented controversial intuitions about the proper operation of government. \u2026 Remarkably, every justice in Learning Resources<\/em> authored or joined a \u201ccommon sense\u201d opinion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The jurist most skeptical of the \u201ccommonsense\u201d turn was Justice Neil Gorsuch, whose concurrence forcefully criticized Justice Amy Coney Barrett\u2019s quasi-canonical invocation of common sense in her own Biden v. Nebraska<\/em> concurrence. As he put it, \u201cif common sense really does go so far as to embrace a rule counseling \u2018skepticism\u2019 of claims by executive officials that Congress has granted them extraordinary powers, that is common sense in name only.\u201d Gorsuch nonetheless joined the portion of the chief justice\u2019s opinion that repeatedly invoked \u201ccommon sense.\u201d<\/p>\n

Learning Resources<\/em> thus illustrates not just the rise of common sense judging, but also the emergence of resistance to it.<\/p>\n

Standing and <\/em>Diamond Alternative Energy<\/p>\n

In the 2025 decision in Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA<\/em>, in which the court held that fuel producers had standing to sue the EPA, Justice Brett Kavanaugh\u2019s majority opinion repeatedly emphasized common sense.<\/p>\n

Consider the following passage, which uses \u201ccommonsense\u201d in four successive sentences:<\/p>\n

In cases of [a certain] kind, this Court\u2019s analysis of causation and redressability has recognized commonsense economic realities. When third party behavior is predictable, commonsense inferences may be drawn. Importantly, EPA agrees that \u201ccommonsense economic principles\u201d can be useful when evaluating Article III standing. In this case, those commonsense economic principles support the fuel producers\u2019 standing.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recognized the court\u2019s distinctively commonsensical mode of argument and responded in part by challenging it:<\/p>\n

I have no quarrel with relying on common sense as a general matter. But we should acknowledge that what counts as a \u201ccommonsense\u201d inference to the Justices on this Court may not be viewed as such by others.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In total, \u201ccommon sense\u201d or \u201ccommonsense\u201d appear over a dozen times in the Diamond Alternative Energy<\/em> opinions.<\/p>\n

The Second Amendment and <\/em>Rahimi<\/p>\n

In 2024\u2019s United States v. Rahimi<\/em>, in which the court upheld a federal law banning persons subject to a domestic-violence restraining order from possessing a gun, the chief justice\u2019s majority opinion also invoked \u201ccommon sense,\u201d noting that certain practices \u201cconfirm what common sense suggests.\u201d<\/p>\n

That statement paired well with the court\u2019s turn toward \u201cprinciples\u201d discernible from history, rather than specific historical analogues. In that vein, Barrett\u2019s separate writing quoted one of her own lower court opinions: \u201cHistory is consistent with common sense: it demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns.\u201d (Though she did not explain which is doing the work \u2013 history, or common sense.)<\/p>\n

Much has been written about the pliability of history and tradition in Second Amendment doctrine. But the other opinions in Rahimi<\/em> demonstrate the pliability of common sense as well. Justice Sonia Sotomayor invoked commonsense, including by quoting Justice Stephen Breyer\u2019s dissent in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen<\/em>. Had the court adopted a \u201crigid approach to [] historical inquiry,\u201d she worried, it would have made it \u201c\u2018nearly impossible to sustain common-sense regulations necessary to our Nation\u2019s safety and security.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more Justice Barrett targeted in \u201cswatting\u201d incident<\/a><\/p>\n

And Justice Clarence Thomas\u2019 dissent used commonsense, too. \u201cIf self-defense is \u2018the central component of the [Second Amendment] right,\u2019 then common sense dictates that it matters whether you can defend yourself with a firearm anywhere, only at home, or nowhere.\u201d (Left unanswered: whether a particular \u201csense\u201d can truly be \u201ccommon,\u201d when it is conditioned on knowing a somewhat arcane point of constitutional law.)<\/p>\n

More<\/em><\/p>\n

Recent scholarship confirms that common sense reasoning is spreading throughout public law. A forthcoming article by Brian Murray addresses \u201cCommon Sense Constitutionalism and the Fourth Amendment.\u201d A forthcoming article by William Aceves criticizes Kavanaugh\u2019s invocation of \u201ccommon sense\u201d in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo<\/em>, as did a post by Jennifer Chac\u00f3n. We understand that more common sense scholarship is in the pipeline.<\/p>\n

Is \u201ccommonsense\u201d judging good?<\/strong><\/p>\n

This commonsense turn is understandable. But ultimately, we think, problematic.<\/p>\n

Part of the problem comes from the plasticity of assertions of common sense. In principle, \u201ccommon sense\u201d could refer to true consensus \u2013 a sense held commonly by all, across ideological and other boundaries. Universally held precepts are an important part of legal reasoning. Traditional legal principles like the absurdity canon and the \u201cgolden rule\u201d employ them. Arguably forms of unwritten law such as natural law, general law, and customary law can also derive from various kinds of consensus \u2013 though these forms of law become much more controversial and of questionable authority the more contested the supposedly common ground.<\/p>\n

But today\u2019s common sense turn is not limited to true consensus. Rather the justices (like many other people) often invoke \u201ccommon sense\u201d when asserting controversial views. They may do so naively, because they erroneously believe that everyone agrees with them; or they might do it more tactically. As a rhetorical maneuver, invoking common sense has the advantage of distancing oneself from a complicated, highfalutin legal analysis. Rather than parsing subsections, multiprong tests, or obscure legal authorities, a lawyer or judge might try to cut through the muck by positing, \u201cIt\u2019s just common sense that X, Y, and Z!\u201d But if that common sense is controversial, not truly common, then the rhetorical maneuver amounts to a form of table-pounding rather than an argument.<\/p>\n

For decades, adherents to textualism and other formalist methodologies fought to diminish legal maneuvers such as the use of legislative purpose, judicial creation of exceptions for special circumstances, and so on. They made arguments about rules, the perils of judicial discretion, the legal legitimacy of enacted texts, and more. Invocations of common sense allow a judge to soften these commitments without explicitly saying so \u2013 and perhaps without fully thinking through the nature of the softness.<\/p>\n

Thus one can see the turn to commonsense as a feature of our ongoing legal realignment. Justices long associated with more rigid judicial philosophies are pivoting to more discretionary modes of decisionmaking. Or, more modestly, even if there is not a complete realignment one could see the common sense turn as reflecting the way various rigid doctrines through exaggerated rigidity and must be modestly trimmed back. Either way, common sense can seem attractive. It provides an unobtrusive cover for a retreat or realignment without coming to terms with what is going on.<\/p>\n

In our view, commonsense judging is becoming too common. Even if judges should indeed have a good measure of common sense, and should use it sometimes, it has gone too far. Invocations of common sense have submerged important questions about legal interpretation \u2013 if textualism or standing doctrine need a nudge, it is probably time for the court to say so explicitly. The justices have obscured real disagreements with empty rhetoric, and as a result passed up opportunities to forge meaningful compromises.<\/p>\n

The act of translating one\u2019s own views (including common sense intuitions) into legal arguments can be difficult, in part because it is disciplining. When justices (or judges, clerks, lawyers …) are tempted to invoke common sense, they should pause and reflect on what claim they really intend to make. An assertion of consensus? (And if so, is it really true?) A tweak of a too-rigid doctrine? (And if so, what tweak, and with what possible downstream consequences?) A distracting bluster? (And if so, distracting from what?)<\/p>\n

And when all of us hear unconvincing assertions of common sense, we can gently push back. \u201cHave you thought about how I might think about this?\u201d, one might ask. \u201cAnd if we disagree, what legal rule supports your sense over mine?\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more Supreme Court sides with death row inmate in challenge to racial discrimination in jury selection<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cCommon sense\u201d reasoning is becoming more common at the Supreme Court. The justices have explicitly relied on common sense to underwrite its holdings in several salient areas of law. And commentators are beginning to seize on that trend. Read more Jury duty for a justice Some examples Major questions and tariffs The most striking recent […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":110,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary","category-controlling-opinions"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u201cCommon sense\u201d reasoning is becoming more common at the Supreme Court. The justices have explicitly relied on common sense to underwrite its holdings in several salient areas of law. And commentators are beginning to seize on that trend. Read more Jury duty for a justice Some examples Major questions and tariffs The most striking recent […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-29T13:44:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-29T13:44:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111\"},\"wordCount\":1412,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/bc17ba28115d2ce93cd760bf6aa6c9cf.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Commentary\",\"Controlling Opinions\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111\",\"name\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/bc17ba28115d2ce93cd760bf6aa6c9cf.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-29T13:44:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/bc17ba28115d2ce93cd760bf6aa6c9cf.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/bc17ba28115d2ce93cd760bf6aa6c9cf.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=111#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem - American Service Review","og_description":"\u201cCommon sense\u201d reasoning is becoming more common at the Supreme Court. The justices have explicitly relied on common sense to underwrite its holdings in several salient areas of law. And commentators are beginning to seize on that trend. Read more Jury duty for a justice Some examples Major questions and tariffs The most striking recent […]","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-05-29T13:44:00+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem","datePublished":"2026-05-29T13:44:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111"},"wordCount":1412,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/bc17ba28115d2ce93cd760bf6aa6c9cf.jpg","articleSection":["Commentary","Controlling Opinions"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111","name":"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/bc17ba28115d2ce93cd760bf6aa6c9cf.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-29T13:44:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/bc17ba28115d2ce93cd760bf6aa6c9cf.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/bc17ba28115d2ce93cd760bf6aa6c9cf.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=111#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=111"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/110"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}