{"id":115,"date":"2026-06-01T13:10:47","date_gmt":"2026-06-01T13:10:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115"},"modified":"2026-06-01T13:10:47","modified_gmt":"2026-06-01T13:10:47","slug":"a-brewing-tariff-refund-battle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115","title":{"rendered":"A brewing tariff refund battle"},"content":{"rendered":"

Welcome to June \u2013 for SCOTUSblog, the busiest month of the year.<\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

On Thursday, the justices met in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from that conference are expected this morning at 9:30 a.m. EDT.<\/p>

Read more Justices validate arbitration exemption for \u201clast-mile\u201d drivers<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div>

Alabama has asked the court on its interim docket to allow it to use a congressional map in this year\u2019s elections that was struck by a lower court as racially discriminatory. Responses to that request are due today by 4 p.m. EDT.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The court has indicated that it may announce opinions on Thursday, June 4, at 10 a.m. EDT. We will be live blogging that morning beginning at 9:30 a.m.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

US to Appeal Judge\u2019s Order for Broad Refund of Trump Tariffs<\/h3>

Laura Curtis, Zoe Tillman, and Erik Larson, Bloomberg<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

On Friday, the Justice Department filed notice with the Court of International Trade that \u201cit will appeal a judge\u2019s authority to order across-the-board refunds of all tariffs ruled illegal by the US Supreme Court\u201d to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, according to Bloomberg. \u201cAt the heart of the dispute is whether the judge has authority to order refunds nationwide for all importers who paid tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, even if they did not file suit in the trade court. The US has suggested that the government need only refund importers who sue, and that the judge\u2019s order is effectively a nationwide injunction that is barred by a recent Supreme Court ruling in the fight over birthright citizenship.\u201d Bloomberg noted that Trump administration\u2019s appeal could \u201cinject[] legal chaos into a claims process that\u2019s already underway.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

There are no Supreme Court vacancies, but some judges are acting like there might be<\/h3>

Julian Mark, The Washington Post<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

Although sources close to Justice Samuel Alito have said he will not retire this year, \u201ca growing number of firebrand conservative judges\u201d appear to be intentionally seeking the national spotlight, potentially to increase their odds of being picked by President Donald Trump to fill a Supreme Court vacancy if one opens up, according to The Washington Post. These judges are \u201cmaking a splash through their opinions, as well as their statements off the bench,\u201d such as by writing \u201c\u2018[t]his is a case about swinging dicks\u2019\u201d in case concerning \u201ca female-only nude spa in the Seattle area whose owners refused service to transgender women with male genitalia\u201d or stating in dissent that judges \u201c\u2018don\u2019t get to demand the President\u2019s homework\u2019\u201d in \u201ca decision invalidating Trump\u2019s use of the\u00a01798 Alien Enemies Act\u00a0to send Venezuelan immigrants whom the president accused of being gang members to prison in El Salvador.\u201d \u201cTrump, and the people around Trump, are going to try to look for people that they have more confidence in even than the previous set of nominees, and that is going to require some kind of further signals of loyalty to the agenda,\u201d said Daniel Epps, a law professor at Washington University, to The Washington Post. \u201cThat just increases the incentives to audition as much as possible.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Louisiana passes new congressional map, dismantling one majority-Black district<\/h3>

Jane C. Timm, NBC News<\/p>

After the Supreme Court ruled in Louisiana v. Callais<\/em> on April 29 that Louisiana\u2019s \u201cexisting congressional map\u201d was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, \u201cLouisiana delayed its House primaries that were scheduled for May 16 to give state lawmakers time to redraw congressional maps there,\u201d according to NBC News. On Friday, lawmakers finished that process, approving a new map \u201celiminating one of the state\u2019s two majority-Black districts and drawing an additional Republican-leaning district in its place.\u201d NBC news noted that the \u201cmap is likely the last one implemented by a state legislature ahead of the 2026 election, as primary season is well underway across the country.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Federal judge upholds constitutionality of nitrogen gas executions<\/h3>

Kim Chandler, Associated Press<\/p>

U.S. District Judge Emily C. Marks on Thursday \u201cruled that execution by nitrogen gas does not violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment, rejecting an Alabama inmate\u2019s claim that it causes excessive suffering,\u201d according to the Associated Press. \u201cThe ruling came after the first bench trial in the country to examine the constitutionality of the execution method that has now been used to put eight people to death. … Inmates executed by nitrogen gas have displayed various levels of shaking during the executions, and lawyers for the state and inmates have disagreed on whether those are involuntary or a sign of suffering.\u201d In her ruling, Marks noted that the inmate, Jeffery Lee, \u201cfaced a high legal bar because the U.S. Supreme Court has yet to find a state\u2019s method of execution qualifies as cruel and unusual.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The battles continue for Casey Martin, decades after Supreme Court case<\/h3>

Mark Schlabach, ESPN<\/p>

ESPN profiled Casey Martin to mark the 25th anniversary of his Supreme Court win. In 2001, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of Martin, a professional golfer who was born \u201cwith a rare and degenerative birth defect called Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome,\u201d which \u201caffects the circulatory system in his leg.\u201d Martin had challenged the PGA Tour\u2019s refusal to allow him to use a cart during golf tournaments, contending that the tour was violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. As a result of the court\u2019s ruling, \u201cMartin was free to ride a cart in PGA Tour events.\u201d Since 2006, Martin has served as golf coach at the University of Oregon and found success in that role, but he\u2019s been struggling in recent years with new health challenges and \u201cisn\u2019t sure how much longer he can coach the Ducks.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
Opinion Analysis<\/span>

Justices validate arbitration exemption for \u201clast-mile\u201d drivers<\/h3>

By Ronald Mann<\/p>

Thursday\u2019s decision in Flowers Foods v. Brock held that an exemption from the Federal Arbitration Act for interstate transportation workers extends to \u201clast-mile\u201d drivers who don\u2019t themselves cross state lines, even though the goods they are delivering are on an interstate journey. That holding protects them from the FAA\u2019s requirement that they litigate disputes with their employers in arbitration as opposed to before a court.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Contributor Corner<\/span>

The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem<\/h3>

By Will Baude & Richard Re<\/p>

In a Controlling Opinions column, Richard Re and Will Baude explored the rise of \u201ccommon sense\u201d reasoning at the Supreme Court \u2013 that is, reliance on common sense inferences rather than other sources of authority, such as the plain meaning of a statutory text. They contended that this approach is problematic. \u201cEven if judges should indeed have a good measure of common sense, and should use it sometimes, it has gone too far.\u201d<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Advisory Opinions<\/span>

District Map Fights Before the 2026 Midterms<\/h3>

David Lat joined Sarah Isgur to discuss the three-judge panel overturning Alabama\u2019s congressional maps, a new lawsuit against President Donald Trump\u2019s slush fund, and a lying judge.<\/p>

Read more The Supreme Court\u2019s common sense problem<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A Closer Look<\/div>

How SCOTUSblog Live Blogs Supreme Court Opinions<\/h3><\/div>

As we enter the heart of opinion season, we thought it would be helpful to revisit past Closer Looks on how SCOTUSblog covers opinion announcements. This piece was originally published on Feb. 4.<\/em><\/p>

One question we often get at SCOTUSblog is how in the world we live blog the announcement of Supreme Court opinions when electronic devices are prohibited in the courtroom.<\/p>

Before answering that, let\u2019s back up a bit. On days when the court announces opinions, the action is divided between\u00a0two\u00a0different venues. The main event is in the courtroom, where justices enter to the traditional \u201cOyez!\u201d cry from the court\u2019s marshal,\u00a0Gail Curley. Once the justices are seated, Chief Justice John Roberts indicates that \u201cJustice [X] has our opinion in [No.-XX, case name].\u201d That justice then reads a summary of the decision, which can range in length from quite short (especially\u00a0if Justice Samuel Alito is doing the reading \u2013 for example, as in 2024\u2019s\u00a0Brown v. United States<\/em>) to fairly long, as often happens in high-profile cases such as\u00a0Trump v. United States<\/em>, in which Roberts\u2019 summary of the majority opinion took nearly 14 minutes.<\/p>

If there are concurring or dissenting opinions, a justice may also opt to read from his or her separate opinion. That said, this is relatively rare and typically a sign that the reading justice sees the case as extremely important or believes the majority has gone terribly astray. For example, in her 2024 dissent from the majority opinion in\u00a0Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo<\/em>, which overturned the\u00a0Chevron<\/em>\u00a0doctrine, Justice Elena Kagan\u00a0said\u00a0the majority put courts at the \u201capex of the administrative process\u201d and that overruling\u00a0Chevron\u00a0threatens \u201ca massive shock to the system.\u201d<\/p>

If there is more than one opinion, the court typically announces its opinions in order of reverse seniority, with the chief justice, who is\u00a0always\u00a0the most senior justice, going last. Once the first opinion announcement is complete, Roberts indicates who has the next opinion. He repeats this process until all of the day\u2019s opinions have been released. At that point, the court moves on to any further proceedings for the day (like admitting new lawyers to the Supreme Court bar or scheduled oral arguments) before the marshal gavels the session to a close.<\/p>

Now back to our original question. While all of this is occurring,\u00a0some\u00a0reporters choose to sit in the courtroom for the opinion announcements. Because, as noted, electronic devices are prohibited in the courtroom, they can only bring in a blank pad of paper and pens and must frantically scribble down anything they hear.<\/p>

But other reporters \u2013 including Amy \u2013 gather on the first floor of the court building, in the court\u2019s press room, immediately adjacent to the court\u2019s Public Information Office. Shortly before 10 a.m. EDT, the reporters gather in the\u00a0, where the opinions are waiting in\u00a0boxes\u00a0to be distributed. (The boxes give us a rough idea of how many opinions we can expect for the day.)<\/p>

As the opinion announcements begin, audio from the courtroom is projected into the PIO. Once the chief justice indicates that a particular justice has the opinion in a particular case, the staff in the PIO begin to distribute the opinions to the waiting reporters from two desks. Once Amy has her paper copy of the opinion, she returns to her desk in the next room, where she determines how the court has ruled and types the result into the platform that we use for our live blog. While this is occurring, Amy also can hear (although not very clearly) the audio of the opinion announcement in the next room. When it sounds like the author is almost finished reading his or her summary of the opinion, Amy then returns to the PIO to wait for the next opinion \u2013 assuming there is one. And on it goes, until opinion announcements for the day come to a close.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE\u00a0SOTOMAYOR: \u201cMr. Katyal, assuming the incredulity of my colleagues continues with your argument, which way would you rather lose?\u201d<\/p>

Read more Jury duty for a justice<\/a><\/p>

\u2014 \u00a0(2013)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, welcome to the heart of decision season.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,22,4,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advisory-opinions","category-contributor-corner","category-newsletter","category-opinion-analysis"],"yoast_head":"\nA brewing tariff refund battle - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A brewing tariff refund battle - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, welcome to the heart of decision season.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-01T13:10:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/85147238fdecd2ddb7b050e98543a404.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"A brewing tariff refund battle\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-01T13:10:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115\"},\"wordCount\":1869,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Advisory Opinions\",\"Contributor Corner\",\"Newsletter\",\"Opinion Analysis\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115\",\"name\":\"A brewing tariff refund battle - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-01T13:10:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=115#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A brewing tariff refund battle\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A brewing tariff refund battle - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A brewing tariff refund battle - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, welcome to the heart of decision season.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-01T13:10:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/85147238fdecd2ddb7b050e98543a404.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"A brewing tariff refund battle","datePublished":"2026-06-01T13:10:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115"},"wordCount":1869,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Advisory Opinions","Contributor Corner","Newsletter","Opinion Analysis"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115","name":"A brewing tariff refund battle - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-01T13:10:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=115#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A brewing tariff refund battle"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}