{"id":169,"date":"2026-06-10T13:13:44","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T13:13:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169"},"modified":"2026-06-10T13:13:44","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T13:13:44","slug":"the-latest-on-tariff-refunds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169","title":{"rendered":"The latest on tariff refunds"},"content":{"rendered":"

As we noted in Monday\u2019s newsletter, we are expecting 23 more opinions by early July. Compared to the past two terms, the court is actually ahead of schedule: At this point last year, there were 26 cases left to decide. And at this point in 2024, there were 27 cases awaiting a ruling.<\/p>

Read more The Supreme Court\u2019s neutering of the First Step Act<\/a><\/p>

Plus, if you\u2019d like to attend our term-in-review event at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Center, which will take place on July 8 from 2:30 to 5:30 p.m. EDT, don\u2019t forget to register your interest here. The event will feature a fireside chat with the ACLU\u2019s Cecillia Wang, who argued the birthright citizenship case before the Supreme Court; a discussion of the historical framework of birthright citizenship from Johns Hopkins professor Martha S. Jones; and a live taping of the Advisory Opinions podcast.<\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

The court has indicated that it may announce opinions on Thursday at 10 a.m. EDT. We will be live blogging that morning beginning at 9:30.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

After any opinion announcements tomorrow, the justices will meet in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from that conference are expected on Monday, June 15, at 9:30 a.m. EDT.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

US trade judge urges Trump administration to speed up tariff refunds<\/h3>

Luc Cohen and Tom Hals, Reuters<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

On Tuesday, Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade \u201curged Trump administration officials to speed up refunds of more than $10 billion in revenue from tariffs that were collected and later deemed illegal by the Supreme Court, but stopped short of issuing a new order compelling them to do so,\u201d according to Reuters. Eaton \u201csaid the delay in processing some claims was leading to a \u2018growing inequity\u2019 between large importers who hired customs brokers to help them navigate a government system for seeking refunds, and smaller businesses which had not.\u201d He also \u201cquestioned whether the government truly intended to process\u201d refunds that have been delayed \u201cgiven its appeal of his March 4 order\u201d requiring all tariff payments to be refunded. A Customs and Border Protection official who testified at Tuesday’s hearing said the government “can’t do it all at once.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

US appeals court raises concerns about Alabama\u2019s use of nitrogen gas for executions<\/h3>

Kim Chandler, Associated Press<\/p>

On Monday night, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit \u201creversed a judge\u2019s May finding that\u201d nitrogen gas execution \u201cdoes not violate the U.S. Constitution\u2019s ban on cruel and unusual punishment,\u201d according to the Associated Press. The panel did not delay Jeffery Lee\u2019s planned execution, which was scheduled for Thursday in Alabama, but it asked U.S. District Judge Emily C. Marks to revisit Lee’s request to die by firing squad. The AP noted that the \u201cSupreme Court requires a two-prong test for people challenging the constitutionality of an execution method. They must show the method provides a substantial risk of superadded pain and that a feasible alternative method is available. The appeals court said Lee met the first test but sent [his case] back to the trial court to consider the second.\u201d On Tuesday, Marks “permanently blocked Alabama from executing” Lee with nitrogen gas, according to a follow-up story from the AP. “A spokesman for Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said the state is reviewing the decision and considering next steps, including an appeal. The case will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court, which has previously let nitrogen executions proceed.”<\/p><\/div><\/div>

A Haitian family waits, and prays, as the Supreme Court decides their future<\/h3>

Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio, Boston Globe<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

As the Supreme Court considers the Trump administration\u2019s effort to end Haitian and Syrian nationals\u2019 participation in the Temporary Protected Status program, the Boston Globe profiled a Haitian family whose lives will be changed \u201cirrevocably\u201d by the justices\u2019 eventual ruling. Lusenie Jean, Marckenson Gilles, and their three children \u201care able to lawfully reside and work in the United States\u201d because of TPS, and the family says \u201closing their legal status would lead to the loss of everything they\u2019ve worked for since 2014, when Gilles first left Haiti in hopes of escaping poverty and violence in the north of the country.\u201d If the court sides with the administration, the family does not plan to return to Haiti due to \u201c[a]rmed conflict and gang violence\u201d there and may, instead, \u201creturn to Brazil, where they spent about five years before coming to the United States.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The Supreme Court Justice Who Ended Up Behind Bars<\/h3>

Major Questions with Jesse Wegman<\/p>

For his Major Questions newsletter, Jesse Wegman wrote about James Wilson, \u201ca Supreme Court justice and American founder you likely haven\u2019t heard of.\u201d After writing \u201can essay that multiple historians believe inspired the preamble of the Declaration of Independence\u201d and \u201cthe first draft of the Constitution,\u201d Wilson was appointed \u201cto the first Supreme Court by George Washington.\u201d But as Wegman explores in his forthcoming book, The Lost Founder<\/em>, Wilson\u2019s legal career \u2013 and personal life \u2013 was ultimately derailed by \u201cdisastrous\u201d financial decisions. \u201cWilson spent his last years buried under a mountain of debt, on the run from his creditors and the law, even while he was still a sitting justice of the Supreme Court.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

If the Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Hold Your Applause<\/h3>

Leah Litman, The Contrarian<\/p>

In a column for The Contrarian, Leah Litman urged court watchers not to give the justices too much credit if and when they invalidate President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order on birthright citizenship. \u201cSome commentators will use such a decision to push back against claims that the Court is partisan at all,\u201d she predicted, \u201cwhile others will suggest that our constitutional system needs the Supreme Court, even if it is this one, to ensure that people like Donald Trump can\u2019t nullify the Constitution.\u201d But, according to Litman, the birthright citizenship battle is an \u201ceasy\u201d case and shouldn\u2019t excuse the court\u2019s recent rulings on race and redistricting, which also involved the 14th Amendment. \u201c[W]hen the Supreme Court says that the President can\u2019t nullify a provision of the Fourteenth Amendment, keep in mind that the Supreme Court is not a reliable check against this administration\u2019s impulse to discard the portions of the Constitution it doesn\u2019t like. In fact, it\u2019s a frequent partner in crime,\u201d Litman contended.<\/p>

Read more The Supreme Court and the right to bear arms: an explainer<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

The Supreme Court and the right to bear arms: an explainer <\/h3>

By Alex Rivenbark<\/p>

In the second entry in her series explaining the Second Amendment, Alex examined what, according to the court, comprises the category of \u201carms\u201d protected by the amendment. Like the question of who comprises \u201cthe people,\u201d the answer here is surprisingly complicated.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Contributor Corner<\/span>

The Supreme Court\u2019s neutering of the First Step Act<\/h3>

By Daniel Harawa<\/p>

In his Civil Rights and Wrongs column, Daniel Harawa examined Supreme Court rulings on the First Step Act, a signification piece of prison reform litigation that aimed to \u201creduce excessive sentences and expand the mechanisms for relief for those serving those harsh sentences.\u201d According to Harawa, \u201cthe bulk of the court\u2019s First Step Act jurisprudence is at war with that purpose.\u201d<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Advisory Opinions<\/span>

Counting Down the Supreme Court Term<\/h3>

Sarah Isgur and David French look at what\u2019s left on the docket from this term before diving into a little Los Angeles mayoral politics.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Ask Amy<\/h3><\/div>

What court traditions do you think should be left behind?<\/strong><\/p>

How much time do you have? There are so many, but I’ll limit it to just one for today. (Although I’m glad to provide more in a future “Ask Amy” … just ask!) I’ll start with the morning coat \u2013 the most formal daytime attire for men, traditionally worn by men in the Office of the U.S. Solicitor General when they argue before the court. If you haven’t been to an argument to see it, think\u00a0Prince William at Ascot, but without the top hat or Princess Kate alongside him. The morning coat is archaic (apparently a vestige of a time\u00a0when all lawyers at the court dressed like this) and, more importantly, it’s deeply gendered. Although some women in the solicitor general’s office have worn the morning suit (or a feminized version of it), it dates back to an era when everyone in the office was a man. And the result is that there is an “official” uniform for men but not for women. The late Chief Justice William Rehnquist once asked Maureen Mahoney, his former clerk and a Deputy Solicitor General during the George H.W. Bush administration, why she didn’t wear the morning coat. She responded that, for women, the equivalent would be a wedding dress. When now-Justice Elena Kagan served as the solicitor general during the Obama administration, she\u00a0opted out of the morning coat altogether, instead wearing a black pantsuit with a light-blue blouse. If a regular suit is good enough for Elena Kagan, it should be good enough for everyone, regardless of gender.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: \u201cIf it were \u2013 if we were not to find State immunity, would the merger be subject to the rule of reason?\u201d<\/p>

MR. WAXMAN: \u201cI am embarrassed to say I don’t know enough about Sherman Act laws \u2013\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: \u201cI was embarrassed to ask the question, but I was taught to ask the question. If it is \u2013 I’m going to assume that we’ll both be \u2013 we’ll both be corrected by our respective colleagues, soon enough.\u201d<\/p>

Read more Trump to Ask Justices to Review His Suit Against CNN<\/a><\/p>

(Laughter.)<\/p>

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: \u201cBut \u2013 but if it \u2013\u201d<\/p>

MR. WAXMAN: \u201cProbably me sooner than you.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: \u201cThat’s likely.\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 \u00a0(2012)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As we noted in Monday\u2019s newsletter, we are expecting 23 more opinions by early July. Compared to the past two terms, the court is actually ahead of schedule: At this point last year, there were 26 cases left to decide. And at this point in 2024, there were 27 cases awaiting a ruling. Read more […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,22,5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advisory-opinions","category-contributor-corner","category-from-the-scotusblog-team","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nThe latest on tariff refunds - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The latest on tariff refunds - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As we noted in Monday\u2019s newsletter, we are expecting 23 more opinions by early July. Compared to the past two terms, the court is actually ahead of schedule: At this point last year, there were 26 cases left to decide. And at this point in 2024, there were 27 cases awaiting a ruling. Read more […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-10T13:13:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ad3af4df58146b8a11bacf2ba5ad7162.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"The latest on tariff refunds\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T13:13:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169\"},\"wordCount\":1653,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Advisory Opinions\",\"Contributor Corner\",\"From the SCOTUSblog Team\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169\",\"name\":\"The latest on tariff refunds - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T13:13:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=169#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The latest on tariff refunds\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The latest on tariff refunds - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The latest on tariff refunds - American Service Review","og_description":"As we noted in Monday\u2019s newsletter, we are expecting 23 more opinions by early July. Compared to the past two terms, the court is actually ahead of schedule: At this point last year, there were 26 cases left to decide. And at this point in 2024, there were 27 cases awaiting a ruling. Read more […]","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-10T13:13:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ad3af4df58146b8a11bacf2ba5ad7162.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"The latest on tariff refunds","datePublished":"2026-06-10T13:13:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169"},"wordCount":1653,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Advisory Opinions","Contributor Corner","From the SCOTUSblog Team","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169","name":"The latest on tariff refunds - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-10T13:13:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=169#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The latest on tariff refunds"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}