{"id":176,"date":"2026-06-11T13:14:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T13:14:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176"},"modified":"2026-06-11T13:14:08","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T13:14:08","slug":"opinions-on-the-way","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176","title":{"rendered":"Opinions on the way"},"content":{"rendered":"

We are thrilled to announce new SCOTUSblog merch, just in time for the heart of opinion season. There are premium hats and tees in exciting colors \u2013 ready to ship nationwide. Check them out here and prepare to live blog in style.<\/p>

Read more Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 11<\/a><\/p>

Plus, a reminder: If you\u2019d like to attend our term-in-review event on July 8 at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Center, don\u2019t forget to register your interest here. The event will feature a fireside chat with the ACLU\u2019s Cecillia Wang, who argued the birthright citizenship case before the Supreme Court; a discussion of the historical framework of birthright citizenship from Johns Hopkins professor Martha S. Jones; and a live taping of the Advisory Opinions podcast.<\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

The court has indicated that it may announce opinions this morning. We will be live blogging beginning at 9:30 a.m. EDT.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

After any opinion announcements, the justices will meet in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from today\u2019s conference are expected on Monday at 9:30 a.m. EDT.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Why the Supreme Court Is Debating Which Founding Fathers Were Drunks<\/h3>

James Romoser, The Wall Street Journal<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

This term, as in all terms, the Supreme Court\u2019s oral argument \u201cdocket is chockablock with tough cases on modern-day problems.\u201d But to decide them, the justices are \u201clooking deep into the past\u201d for such information as \u201cthe drinking habits of the Founding Fathers\u201d and \u201ca long-forgotten voting practice from the Civil War,\u201d according to The Wall Street Journal. \u201cThe time machine is driven by the ascendance of originalism\u2014the legal philosophy, pioneered by conservatives, that says the meaning of the Constitution\u2019s words shouldn\u2019t evolve over time. Though the theory has been fashionable for decades, the court\u2019s conservative supermajority has embraced it with new fervor, sending attorneys scrambling for historical nuggets that once were more useful for Trivial Pursuit.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Texas death row inmate asks Supreme Court to allow appeal challenging hypnotized witness<\/h3>

Ayden Runnels, The Texas Tribune<\/p>

At their private conference on Thursday, the justices will consider a petition for review from Charles Don Flores, who \u201cwas sentenced to death in 1999 for the robbery and murder of 64-year-old Betty Black\u201d in Texas. At Flores\u2019 trial, \u201cprosecutors leaned on the testimony of Jill Barganier,\u201d whom investigators hypnotized in hopes of improving her description of what she saw the day Black was killed. In his petition, Flores contends \u201cthat Barganier\u2019s recollection was improperly influenced\u201d by the hypnosis session and that he has a right to challenge his conviction under a Texas law that \u201callows inmates to challenge convictions that relied on now-debunked science or procedures,\u201d according to The Texas Tribune.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

US Refunds $22 Billion in Tariffs, Offsetting Customs Revenue<\/h3>

Daniel Flatley and Laura Curtis, Bloomberg<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

In May, the U.S. Treasury \u201crefunded nearly $22 billion in tariff revenue,\u201d as it began making repayments after \u201cthe Supreme Court struck down a major component of President Donald Trump\u2019s trade policy,\u201d according to Bloomberg. Treasury Department data for the month shows that the refund amount \u201cwas roughly equal to tariffs taken in during\u201d May, \u201cmeaning that refunds essentially canceled out the government\u2019s duties revenue.\u201d Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week that the administration expects tariff revenue to increase later this year to levels seen when the now-invalidated tariffs were in place once planned replacement tariffs \u2013 which are being “imposed using other authorities” \u2013 are fully implemented.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

How a coming Supreme Court decision on mail-in ballots could impact California<\/h3>

Sophie Brams, The Hill<\/p>

The Supreme Court will soon decide Watson v. Republican National Committee<\/em>, a case on \u201cwhether states can accept mail-in ballots that arrive after election.\u201d The ruling \u201ccould invalidate the so-called grace period in places like California,\u201d which counts ballots that arrive at secure drop-off locations by 8 p.m. on Election Day or are postmarked by Election Day and arrive by the following Tuesday, and it \u201cwill come after enormous attention was paid across the country to the results in both the California governor\u2019s contest and the battle for mayor of Los Angeles,\u201d according to The Hill. Although the \u201cdecision would likely have no bearing on those races because they are state and local and not federal,\u201d \u201cit could have consequences for U.S. House races in the fall,\u201d if states like California are required to \u201cchange their vote-counting rules.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

A Year After Supreme Court Decision, Kid Lit Creators are Buoyed by Community<\/h3>

Kara Yorio, School Library Journal<\/p>

Last year, the court in Mahmoud v. Taylor<\/em> allowed religious parents to opt their children out of school lessons involving books that highlight LGBTQ+ themes. The decision disappointed the authors and illustrators of the challenged books, but it also \u201ccreated a steadfast community of authors and illustrators not only committed to supporting each other and fighting censorship, but continuing to create books with LGBTQIA+ characters,\u201d according to the School Library Journal, which noted that the creators call their community the \u201cSCOTUS Book Club.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

When must justices recuse themselves over family members\u2019 acts?<\/h3>

By Kelsey Dallas<\/p>

Late last month, the news site NOTUS reignited the perennial debate about Supreme Court recusals when it reported that Justice Samuel Alito\u2019s son, Philip Alito, is working as a lawyer in the Treasury Department. This is not the first time a justice has navigated perceived or real ethical issues related to their loved ones\u2019 actions, and, indeed, a justice once retired due to his concerns about conflicts of interest raised by his son\u2019s new job.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Relist Watch<\/span>

Race and recorded calls<\/h3>

By John Elwood<\/p>

In his Relist Watch column, John Elwood highlighted two petitions for review that will be considered by the justices for a second time at today\u2019s conference: United States v. Carter, on whether race can be a relevant factor in the Fourth Amendment test for determining when a police encounter constitutes a seizure; and Grayson v. United States, on whether there is a \u201cclean hands\u201d exception permitting admission of illegally intercepted evidence when the government played no part in the interception.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Contributor Corner<\/span>

The Supreme Court\u2019s confusing use of \u201cprinciples\u201d <\/h3>

By Rory Little<\/p>

In his ScotusCrim column, Rory Little explored the court\u2019s recent use of \u201cprinciples\u201d with unknown origins, such as the party presentation principle, to decide criminal cases, contending that the justices \u201cshould precisely describe and define these ideas,\u201d particularly when they are \u201cemployed as \u2018rules\u2019 to justify keeping a person in prison.\u201d<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Amarica’s Constitution<\/span>

Bigotry vs Bureaucracy: State Action and Private Freedom<\/h3>

There\u2019s some highly questionable behavior going on in an area of Missouri, where a fringe group seeks to establish a whites-only enclave. Objectionable? Akhil Amar and Andy Lipka think so. Unconstitutional? Therein lies an opening to a whole host of questions.<\/p>

Read more Race and recorded calls<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A Closer Look<\/div>

Newman v. Moore<\/h3><\/div>

At their private conference on Thursday, the justices are scheduled to consider a petition for review from the oldest active federal judge in the United States, who has been fighting for more than three years to regain her ability to hear and decide cases. Judge Pauline Newman, 98, was suspended by her colleagues on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 2023 over her refusal to provide medical records and undergo testing related to her mental fitness, and she is urging the Supreme Court to clear the way for her suspension to be reviewed in federal court.<\/p>

Even before the suspension saga began, Newman was a prominent figure in the legal world. She \u201chelped create the Federal Circuit in 1982\u201d and went on to become its \u201cgreat dissenter,\u201d dissenting nearly 300 times in patent cases over her four decades of service, \u201cmore than three times as often as the next-closest judge on the court,\u201d according to The Washington Post, which cited a 2017 study on her work.<\/p>

Newman contends that those dissents helped motivate her suspension, which she characterizes as a form of \u201cbullying\u201d in her petition for review. But her colleagues, including Federal Circuit Chief Judge Kimberly Moore, that the investigation into Newman\u2019s fitness for service and subsequent suspension stem, instead, from concerns about how long it was taking her to complete opinions, her behavior with staff members, and signs of paranoia and memory loss.<\/p>

In May 2023, while the investigation was in its initial stages, Newman filed the federal lawsuit that led to the petition now before the Supreme Court. She contended that the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit had violated her due process rights by refusing her request for another circuit to conduct the investigation, that the council had exceeded its authority, and that the statute allowing for judges to be suspended from hearing cases was facially unconstitutional and unconstitutional as applied to her.<\/p>

A federal district court in Washington, D.C., and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Judicial Councils Reform and Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980 barred them from reviewing most of Newman\u2019s claims and rejected the remaining ones. Specifically, they pointed to the Disability\u2019s Act\u2019s section on judicial review, which states that a \u201cjudge aggrieved by an action of the judicial council … may petition the Judicial Conference of the United States for review,\u201d but that \u201corders and determinations\u201d made in the proceedings \u201cshall not be judicially reviewable.\u201d<\/p>

In her to the Supreme Court, Newman contends that the D.C. Circuit misinterpreted the Disability Act\u2019s restrictions on judicial review and applied them too broadly. \u201cNothing\u201d in the act, according to Newman, \u201cpurports to prevent litigants from seeking\u201d forward-looking relief that would, for example, bar a judicial council from extending an existing suspension, and the act also doesn\u2019t prevent review of decisions that the council never had the authority to make in the first place. The Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit\u2019s suspension orders amount to such a decision, Newman asserts, because the council \u201ceffectively remov[ed] her from office despite the life tenure promised by Article III.\u201d<\/p>

Newman points to \u201cthree expert evaluations\u201d showing that she has \u201cthe mental ability of someone decades younger,\u201d and notes that, less than three months before \u201cMoore began pressuring her to resign\u201d over her alleged mental deterioration, she penned a \u201ccharacteristically excellent\u201d dissent that the Supreme Court later drew on \u201cwhen it reversed the Federal Circuit\u201d in a case on veterans\u2019 education benefits. Newman urges the Supreme Court to step in and allow judicial review of her claims. As it stands, according to Newman, \u201c[e]very judge who gets crosswise with her chief judge or her colleagues must now worry whether similar tactics could be used to remove them.\u201d<\/p>

In their to Newman\u2019s petition, which was filed by U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer and which is partially redacted, Moore, the two other members of the special committee that investigated Newman, and the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit assert that the petition fails the Supreme \u201cCourt\u2019s criteria for review many times over,\u201d in large part because it raises claims that were not \u201cadequately pressed or passed upon below.\u201d The brief further argues that the claims find no support in the text of the Disability Act, which \u201cbroadly provides that \u2018all<\/em> orders and determinations\u2019 by a judicial council or the Judicial Conference \u2018shall not be judicially reviewable on appeal or otherwise<\/em>.\u2019\u201d \u201c\u2018All\u2019 means all,\u201d Sauer wrote, and the petition \u201cshould be denied.\u201d<\/p>

Newman v. Moore<\/em> is scheduled to be considered by the justices for the first time at their private conference on Thursday.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE GINSBURG: \u201cYes, but Title VII doesn’t say \u2018right to sue.\u2019 It’s a name that the agency uses, but it’s not \u2013 it’s not in the statute. The statute doesn’t say you have a right to sue.\u201d<\/p>

MR. McCONNELL: \u201cWell, what the statute says is you may bring a suit in court. And so, if this Court \u2013 I do not see how the Court can say that the right \u2013 that the language \u2018the right to sue\u2019 is different from a right of action. It certainly \u2013 it’s \u2013 it is the same thing.\u201d <\/p>

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: \u201cOne way you could do it is that the right to sue is more familiar colloquially. If somebody, you know, hits your car and you jump out angrily and say \u2013 you can say: I’m going to sue you. You’re not likely to say: I’m going to bring a cause of action against you.\u201d<\/p>

Read more The Supreme Court\u2019s confusing use of \u201cprinciples\u201d<\/a><\/p>

\u2014 \u00a0(2011)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, don\u2019t miss our new SCOTUSblog merch!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,22,5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-amaricas-constitution","category-contributor-corner","category-from-the-scotusblog-team","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nOpinions on the way - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Opinions on the way - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, don\u2019t miss our new SCOTUSblog merch!\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-11T13:14:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cb03a6ab89c3e1fe3113d6b457530f0e.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Opinions on the way\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-11T13:14:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176\"},\"wordCount\":2104,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Amarica's Constitution\",\"Contributor Corner\",\"From the SCOTUSblog Team\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176\",\"name\":\"Opinions on the way - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-11T13:14:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=176#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Opinions on the way\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Opinions on the way - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Opinions on the way - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, don\u2019t miss our new SCOTUSblog merch!","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-11T13:14:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1800,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/cb03a6ab89c3e1fe3113d6b457530f0e.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Opinions on the way","datePublished":"2026-06-11T13:14:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176"},"wordCount":2104,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Amarica's Constitution","Contributor Corner","From the SCOTUSblog Team","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176","name":"Opinions on the way - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-11T13:14:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=176#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Opinions on the way"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}