{"id":196,"date":"2026-06-16T13:09:24","date_gmt":"2026-06-16T13:09:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196"},"modified":"2026-06-16T13:09:24","modified_gmt":"2026-06-16T13:09:24","slug":"court-adds-three-cases-to-2026-27-docket","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196","title":{"rendered":"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket"},"content":{"rendered":"

Reminder: We\u2019ve got new merch! Celebrate your love of SCOTUSblog and Advisory Opinions with a new hat or shirt.<\/p>

Read more Justices urged to stop Texas from enforcing age-verification and parental-consent law on apps<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

On Monday, the court added three cases to its oral argument docket for next term and denied several notable petitions for review. For more on Monday\u2019s , see the Morning Reads and On Site sections below.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The court has indicated that it will next release opinions on Thursday at 10 a.m. EDT. We will be live blogging that morning beginning at 9:30.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

After any opinion announcements on Thursday, the justices will meet in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from that conference are expected on Monday, June 22, at 9:30 a.m. EDT.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Supreme Court won\u2019t hear 98-year-old judge\u2019s bid to end suspension<\/h3>

Zach Schonfeld, The Hill<\/p>

On Monday, the Supreme Court announced that it will not \u201ctake up the oldest active federal judge\u2019s bid to end her suspension, which her colleagues issued after she refused their demands for mental fitness testing,\u201d according to The Hill. \u201cPauline Newman, who turns 99 on Saturday and rejects the notion she is unfit to serve, sued her fellow judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit after they indefinitely prevented her from taking on new cases.\u201d By rejecting her petition for review, the justices leave in place a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit holding that \u201cfederal district judges have no authority to hear lawsuits challenging judicial misconduct decisions.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Supreme Court won’t hear tariff challenge, paving way for new Trump action<\/h3>

Maureen Groppe, USA Today<\/p>

Approximately four months after striking down tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the court on Monday declined to get involved in a separate tariff battle dating back to 2018, when Trump invoked the 1974 Trade Act to impose tariffs on imports from China, according to USA Today. The act allows for such tariffs to be put in place after an investigation and hearings on \u201cunfair trade practices,\u201d but the challengers in HMTX Industries, LLC v. United States<\/em> contended that it does not allow for these tariffs to be \u201cdramatically ratchet[ed] up\u201d amid a trade war with the targeted country. USA Today noted that the \u201cjustices\u2019 decision not to review a ruling\u201d upholding the tariffs on China \u201ccould embolden the administration as it seeks to replace many of the emergency tariffs\u201d that were invalidated earlier this year.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Texas death row inmate\u2019s appeal challenging hypnosis testimony<\/h3>

Ellie Ashby, The Texas Tribune<\/p>

The justices on Monday \u201crejected Texas death row inmate Charles Flores\u2019 efforts to force the state\u2019s highest criminal court to reconsider his appeal,\u201d according to The Texas Tribune. \u201cFlores argued that his 1999 conviction should be overturned under the Texas \u2018junk science\u2019 law because testimony from a key witness was improperly influenced by hypnosis performed by a police officer who was investigating\u201d the murder Flores was ultimately convicted of committing. Flores asked the justices to order the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to reconsider its holding that \u201che failed to meet the\u201d junk science \u201claw\u2019s requirement that new evidence be previously unavailable, among other standards.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Frustrated by Courts, Trump Weighed Suspending a Constitutional Right<\/h3>

Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, The New York Times<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

Citing \u201ca secret memo\u201d written by the White House staff secretary, The New York Times reported on Monday that the Trump administration last year seriously considered suspending habeas rights for unauthorized immigrants as part of a broader deportation push. \u201cThe suspension of habeas corpus has occurred just a handful of times in U.S. history, and always under the most dire circumstances of war or invasion. Yet to a greater degree than previously known, administration officials, encouraged by Mr. Trump, actively weighed taking that step in the early months of his second term.\u201d In his memo to the White House chief of staff, Will Scharf counseled against that move, noting that it would \u201clikely precipitate hazardous legal and constitutional battles.\u201d \u201cEven where Congress has explicitly suspended habeas corpus rights, the Supreme Court has held that some alternative process must be provided to defendants, with procedural safeguards akin to a habeas corpus action,\u201d Scharf wrote.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

How a great historian influenced the Supreme Court<\/h3>

Jason Willick, The Washington Post<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

In a column for The Washington Post, Jason Willick highlighted the late historian Gordon S. Wood\u2019s influence on the Supreme Court. \u201cWood is cited in at least 24 opinions in 22 high court cases to support arguments about the Constitution\u2019s meaning. The citations are overwhelmingly to his first book, \u2018The Creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787,\u2019 published in 1969, when Wood was 35,\u201d and come in cases about such issues as \u201cthe president\u2019s power to appoint federal officers\u201d and \u201cthe constitutionality of term limits for members of Congress.\u201d Willick noted that the \u201crise of Wood in Supreme Court advocacy is inseparable from the rise of originalism. … When the Constitution\u2019s original meaning began to matter more in the law, the authority on early American political thought understandably attracted judicial attention from liberals and conservatives alike.\u201d Wood died on June 7 at age \u201c92 after he was hit by a car in Rhode Island.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
Court News<\/span>

Court agrees to hear three new cases, including on the constitutionality of six-person juries<\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

The court on Monday added three new cases, on issues ranging from hearings for noncitizens in immigration detention to the constitutionality of Florida\u2019s six-person juries and the exceptions to the general rule on second petitions for federal post-conviction relief. The announcement came as part of a list of orders from the justices\u2019 June 11 conference, which also included two dissents by Justice Samuel Alito from the denial of review in cases involving student speech and the constitutionality of a prosecutor\u2019s comments in a capital murder trial.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Court News<\/span>

Justices urged to stop Texas from enforcing age-verification and parental-consent law on apps<\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

A student group and a trade association have asked the court on its interim docket to restore orders by a federal judge in Austin, Texas, that bar the state from enforcing a law that imposes age-verification and parental-consent requirements on minors\u2019 access to apps and paid content within those apps. Half the states have similar age-verification requirements for minors.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Contributor Corner<\/span>

The dissent that became a statute<\/h3>

By Anastasia Boden<\/p>

In her In Dissent column, Anastasia Boden highlighted Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg\u2019s dissent in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., a 2007 case in which the court held that Lilly Ledbetter\u2019s sex discrimination claims over being paid less than men working the same job were foreclosed because they were filed too late. In her dissent, Ginsburg noted that \u201cthe ball is in Congress\u2019 court\u201d when it came to addressing the issues raised in the case. Congress did indeed act two years later, passing the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
A Closer Look<\/div>

The Box Count<\/h3><\/div>

As we enter the heart of opinion season, we thought it would be helpful to revisit past Closer Looks on how SCOTUSblog covers opinion announcements. This piece was originally published on March 31.<\/em><\/p>

Read more Court agrees to hear three new cases, including on the constitutionality of six-person juries<\/a><\/p>

If you regularly attend our opinion day\u00a0live blogs, you\u2019ve likely noticed that certain questions come up nearly every time. For example, do we know in advance which opinions are coming? (No.) Is live audio available from the courtroom during opinion announcements? (Also no.) And how many boxes are there? (It varies.)<\/p>

The box question typically sparks a series of additional questions from blog newcomers and veterans alike. What are these boxes you\u2019re speaking of? Why do they matter? And,\u00a0more recently, do the boxes seem heavy or light?<\/p>

Let us take those questions in order. First off, the boxes are literal boxes. They are made of light blue carboard and look something like\u00a0this. The boxes are used by the Supreme Court\u2019s Public Information Office to bring copies of soon-to-be-released opinions to members of the press. A member of the PIO team lifts them onto desks in the PIO\u2019s outer office at 9:55 a.m. EDT, when the five-minute buzzer sounds. That means that, although reporters do not see the actual opinions before they are announced by the court shortly after 10:00 a.m. EDT, they do see the box(es) before then (which Amy reports on the live blog), prompting the box count discussion.<\/p>

As to the second question, the box count is significant because it gives us a sense of how many opinions might be coming. If there is just one box, the court is unlikely to be releasing more than three short opinions \u2013 and, indeed, is likely only releasing one or two opinions \u2013 because copies of three long opinions wouldn\u2019t fit in a single box. It follows that when there are two boxes, we can safely predict that at least three opinions are on the way.<\/p>

In recent live blogs, we\u2019ve also talked \u2013 it may be more accurate to say\u00a0joked\u00a0\u2013 about how heavy or \u201cpuffy\u201d the day\u2019s box seems to be. Amy describes whether it seemed to take more effort than usual for the box to be carried in. Much like the box count seeks to estimate how many opinions may be released, this metric is aimed at making a more educated guess about how many opinions a box contains.<\/p>

Admittedly, tracking the box count (and box weight) only gets you so far on opinion days. Sure, learning that there are two or three boxes instead of one makes it clear that it will be a busy morning, but knowing the box count on\u00a0Friday, Feb. 20\u00a0(one) didn\u2019t mean we knew for sure that the tariffs decision was coming. The reporters at the court got that answer when Chief Justice John Roberts began announcing the tariffs ruling in the courtroom, which prompted staffers in the Public Information Office to hand out copies of the opinion to those gathered around the box.<\/p>

Still, this tracking can bring a sense of control to chaotic opinion days, and, perhaps most importantly, it\u2019s a fun aspect of one very serious institution.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: \u201cCounsel, is \u2013 this group or gang, all of them had gold teeth and faded hair cuts?\u201d<\/p>

MR. SHANMUGAM: \u201cThere were five other suspects who had gold teeth or \u2013 and low-cut haircuts. Three of the other individuals who were primarily in the frame for this murder had those characteristics \u2026\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: \u201cIn short, faded hair cuts and gold teeth were not a unique characteristic.\u201d<\/p>

MR. SHANMUGAM: \u201cThey were not uncommon in the 1990s.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201c\u2026 They’re uncommon to me.\u201d<\/p>

(Laughter.)<\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cThese were not gold teeth that were implanted, right? They \u2013 what was it? Some kind of a mouthpiece of gold?\u201d<\/p>

MR. SHANMUGAM: \u201cI have to admit that my familiarity with this practice is perhaps not that much greater than yours \u2026\u201d<\/p>

Read more The dissent that became a statute<\/a><\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cI’m sorry to hear that.\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 \u00a0(2011)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, the justices denied several notable petitions for review on Monday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-contributor-corner","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nCourt adds three cases to 2026-27 docket - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, the justices denied several notable petitions for review on Monday.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-16T13:09:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/fb67fd2796514c467212e7e411b8a3b3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-16T13:09:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196\"},\"wordCount\":1882,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Contributor Corner\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196\",\"name\":\"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-16T13:09:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=196#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, the justices denied several notable petitions for review on Monday.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-16T13:09:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/fb67fd2796514c467212e7e411b8a3b3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket","datePublished":"2026-06-16T13:09:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196"},"wordCount":1882,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Contributor Corner","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196","name":"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-16T13:09:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=196#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}