{"id":207,"date":"2026-06-17T15:39:44","date_gmt":"2026-06-17T15:39:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207"},"modified":"2026-06-17T15:39:44","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T15:39:44","slug":"is-the-supreme-court-running-behind","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207","title":{"rendered":"Is the Supreme Court running behind?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>When the justices take the bench on Thursday morning to issue opinions, the Supreme Court will have 20 cases left to decide, with just under two weeks to go before the end of June \u2013 the point by which the justices normally release all of their decisions and leave for their summer recess. Moreover, a not-insubstantial portion of those 20 cases are expected to be major rulings. This has led to questions about the timing and pace of opinion announcements for the rest of the term, and in particular whether the justices might be \u201cbehind\u201d in releasing opinions or whether the court might need to extend into early July to finish up.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=205\">Bivens at the bedside<\/a><\/p>\n<p>A close look at the past five terms suggests that there is nothing especially unusual about the current term. To the contrary, this term falls comfortably within the norm. This is true both in terms of the sheer volume of cases left to decide as of June 17 each year and the number of high-profile or \u201cmajor\u201d cases (although the definition of such cases is, of course, subjective). The final decisions of the term came on July 1 in two of those five years; otherwise, the justices issued all of their decisions by the end of June.<\/p>\n<p>In two years \u2013 2025 and 2024 \u2013 the justices had more cases (21) left to decide as of June 17. Last year, the court ultimately issued 20 opinions and an order setting <em>Louisiana v. Callais<\/em>, the challenge to Louisiana\u2019s congressional map, for reargument in the fall. At least five of those 21 cases last term were \u201cmajor\u201d ones:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Trump v. CASA<\/em> (argued May 15), in which the Trump administration had asked the court to limit the availability of so-called \u201cuniversal\u201d or \u201cnationwide\u201d injunctions;<\/li>\n<li><em>Mahmoud v. Taylor<\/em> (argued April 22), a challenge by a group of Maryland parents to their inability to opt out of the use of LGBTQ-inclusive storybooks in school;<\/li>\n<li><em>United States v. Skrmetti<\/em> (argued Dec. 4), a challenge to Tennessee\u2019s ban on some forms of medical treatment, such as hormone therapy, for transgender minors;<\/li>\n<li><em>Louisiana v. Callais<\/em> (argued March 24); and<\/li>\n<li><em>Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton<\/em> (argued Jan. 15), a challenge to a Texas law requiring age verification for pornographic websites.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The court issued its final five decisions in argued cases (including <em>CASA<\/em>, <em>Mahmoud<\/em>, and <em>Free Speech Coalition<\/em>, as well as the reargument order in <em>Callais<\/em>) before its summer recess on June 27, 2025. It had released four opinions the day before that, June 26.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, in 2024, at least five of the court\u2019s 21 cases remaining as of June 17 were \u201cmajor\u201d cases, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Trump v. United States<\/em> (argued April 25), in which the court was considering whether (then-former) President Donald Trump was immune from criminal prosecution for his acts as president;<\/li>\n<li><em>Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo<\/em> (argued Jan. 17), a challenge to the deferential standard that courts used to review a federal agency\u2019s interpretation of ambiguous laws;<\/li>\n<li><em>Moyle v. United States<\/em> (argued April 24), on whether a federal law requiring hospitals that receive federal funding to provide emergency care trumps an Idaho law criminalizing most abortions;<\/li>\n<li><em>United States v. Rahimi<\/em> (argued Nov. 7), a challenge to the constitutionality of a federal law making it a crime for the subject of a domestic violence restraining order to have a gun; and<\/li>\n<li><em>Ohio v. EPA<\/em> (argued Feb. 21), on whether to pause an EPA rule intended to reduce air pollution from power plants and other industrial facilities in 23 states.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The court issued its final three decisions in argued cases on July 1, 2024; that opinion announcement day followed a flurry of activity in which the court released two opinions on June 26, four opinions on June 27, and three on June 28.<\/p>\n<p>In 2022 and 2023, the court had fewer opinions left to release \u2013 18 as of June 17, 2022, and 17 as of June 17, 2023. But in both of those years, the court issued several opinions shortly before June 17 \u2013 in 2023, it issued a total of five opinions on June 15 and June 16, while in 2022 it issued six opinions on June 15. Or, to put it another way, the court still entered the second half of June in both years with more than 20 cases left to decide.<\/p>\n<p>2022 also rivaled this year in terms of the number of \u201cmajor\u201d cases \u2013 some of which, like this year, are true blockbusters \u2013 left to decide, including:<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=204\">Supreme Court may decide important case on immigration detention regarding attorneys\u2019 fees<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen<\/em> (argued Nov. 3), a challenge to the constitutionality of New York\u2019s concealed-carry licensing scheme;<\/li>\n<li><em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/em> (argued Dec. 1), a challenge to a Mississippi law that bans almost all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy, and in which the state had asked the court to overturn its landmark ruling in <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em>;<\/li>\n<li><em>Kennedy v. Bremerton School District<\/em> (argued April 25), a lawsuit by a football coach who was fired because he prayed on the field after games;<\/li>\n<li><em>West Virginia v. EPA<\/em> (argued Feb. 28), on the EPA\u2019s power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions;<\/li>\n<li><em>Biden v. Texas<\/em> (argued April 26), on whether the Biden administration had to continue to enforce a Trump-era program known as the \u201cremain in Mexico\u201d policy, which requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S. immigration court; and<\/li>\n<li><em>Carson v. Makin<\/em> (argued Dec. 8), a challenge to a Maine law that banned the use of public funds for students to use at private schools that provide religious instruction.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The court issued the final two opinions of the term on June 30, 2022; it had also released two opinions on June 29, 2022, and three opinions on June 27, 2022.<\/p>\n<p>The court followed a very similar schedule the following year, when it had five major cases left to release as of June 17, 2023:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Moore v. Harper<\/em> (argued Dec. 7), on whether the Constitution gives state legislatures nearly complete authority to regulate federal elections, with little to no interference from state courts;<\/li>\n<li><em>Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College<\/em> (argued Oct. 31), challenges to the constitutionality of the undergraduate admissions programs at Harvard College and the University of North Carolina;<\/li>\n<li><em>Biden v. Nebraska<\/em> and <em>Department of Education v. Brown<\/em> (argued Feb. 28), challenges to the Biden administration\u2019s student-loan debt relief program; and<\/li>\n<li><em>303 Creative v. Elenis<\/em> (argued Dec. 5), a lawsuit by a Christian website designer who wanted to create wedding websites \u2013 but not for same-sex couples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The court finished issuing opinions on June 30, 2023, with three that day. It issued three each on June 29 and June 27.<\/p>\n<p>Much like this year, the court had 20 cases left to decide as of June 17, 2021. Five of those cases were \u201cmajor\u201d ones:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Fulton v. Philadelphia<\/em> (argued Nov. 4), a challenge by a faith-based foster-care agency to the city\u2019s refusal to refer cases to it because of the agency\u2019s bar on certifying unmarried or same-sex married couples as foster parents;<\/li>\n<li><em>California v. Texas<\/em> (argued Nov. 10), a renewed challenge to the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act\u2019s individual mandate;<\/li>\n<li><em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.<\/em> (argued April 28), a high school cheerleader\u2019s First Amendment challenge to her suspension from the team, based on social media postings made outside of school;<\/li>\n<li><em>Americans for Prosperity v. Bonta<\/em> (argued April 26), a challenge to the constitutionality of California\u2019s requirement that charities and nonprofits operating in the state provide the state attorney general\u2019s office with the names and addresses of their largest donors; and<\/li>\n<li><em>Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee<\/em> (argued March 2), a challenge to the legality of two Arizona voting restrictions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The court finished releasing opinions in argued cases on July 1, 2021, when it released two opinions. It issued five opinions on two opinion days \u2013June 28 (two opinions) and 29 (three) \u2013 leading up to that.<\/p>\n<p>As of Wednesday, some of the major cases remaining for the court to decide this term include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Trump v. Slaughter<\/em> (argued Dec. 8), the challenge by FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter to Trump\u2019s firing of her without cause;<\/li>\n<li><em>Little v. Hecox<\/em> and <em>West Virginia v. B.P.J.<\/em> (argued Jan. 13), challenges to state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit transgender women and girls from competing on women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sports teams;<\/li>\n<li><em>Trump v. Cook<\/em> (argued Jan. 21), involving the Trump administration\u2019s attempt to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve\u2019s Board of Governors, based on allegations (that she disputes) of mortgage fraud;<\/li>\n<li><em>United States v. Hemani<\/em> (argued March 2), a challenge to the constitutionality of a Texas man\u2019s conviction under a federal law that prevents the users of illegal drugs from having a gun;<\/li>\n<li><em>Watson v. Republican National Committee<\/em> (argued March 23), a challenge to a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted as long as they are postmarked by, and received within five days of, Election Day; and<\/li>\n<li><em>Trump v. Barbara<\/em> (argued April 1), on the legality of Trump\u2019s executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, the virtually automatic guarantee of citizenship to everyone born in the United States.<\/li>\n<li><em>Mullin v. Doe<\/em> (along with <em>Trump v. Miot<\/em>) (argued April 29), a challenge to the Trump administration\u2019s decision to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitian and Syrian citizens in the United States.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>There is no way to know exactly when the court will issue these and the other remaining decisions, or when it will begin its summer recess. But if recent years provide any clues, it seems very likely that the justices will finish by July 1 \u2013 if not before \u2013 and that they could finish with a flurry of opinion days in the run-up to whatever the final day proves to be.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=203\">Haitian nationals ask for DIG in TPS Case<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When the justices take the bench on Thursday morning to issue opinions, the Supreme Court will have 20 cases left to decide, with just under two weeks to go before the end of June \u2013 the point by which the justices normally release all of their decisions and leave for their summer recess. Moreover, a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":206,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-scotus-focus"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Is the Supreme Court running behind? - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is the Supreme Court running behind? - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When the justices take the bench on Thursday morning to issue opinions, the Supreme Court will have 20 cases left to decide, with just under two weeks to go before the end of June \u2013 the point by which the justices normally release all of their decisions and leave for their summer recess. Moreover, a [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-17T15:39:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Is the Supreme Court running behind?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-17T15:39:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207\"},\"wordCount\":1584,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/267c7c60e0ebdaca033de543f4d92a62.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"SCOTUS FOCUS\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207\",\"name\":\"Is the Supreme Court running behind? - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/267c7c60e0ebdaca033de543f4d92a62.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-17T15:39:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/267c7c60e0ebdaca033de543f4d92a62.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/267c7c60e0ebdaca033de543f4d92a62.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=207#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is the Supreme Court running behind?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is the Supreme Court running behind? - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is the Supreme Court running behind? - American Service Review","og_description":"When the justices take the bench on Thursday morning to issue opinions, the Supreme Court will have 20 cases left to decide, with just under two weeks to go before the end of June \u2013 the point by which the justices normally release all of their decisions and leave for their summer recess. Moreover, a [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-17T15:39:44+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Is the Supreme Court running behind?","datePublished":"2026-06-17T15:39:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207"},"wordCount":1584,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/267c7c60e0ebdaca033de543f4d92a62.jpg","articleSection":["SCOTUS FOCUS"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207","name":"Is the Supreme Court running behind? - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/267c7c60e0ebdaca033de543f4d92a62.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-17T15:39:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/267c7c60e0ebdaca033de543f4d92a62.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/267c7c60e0ebdaca033de543f4d92a62.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=207#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is the Supreme Court running behind?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}