{"id":220,"date":"2026-06-22T13:13:20","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T13:13:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220"},"modified":"2026-06-22T13:13:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T13:13:20","slug":"a-new-wave-of-election-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220","title":{"rendered":"A new wave of election cases"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Welcome to what will likely be a busy week at the Supreme Court. We\u2019re expecting 17 more opinions by early July, and we know that there will be at least two opinion announcement days this week.<\/p>\n

Read more Cameras in the courtroom?<\/a><\/p>\n

Reminder: If you\u2019d like to attend our July 8 term-in-review event at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Center, register your interest here. The event will feature a fireside chat with the ACLU\u2019s Cecillia Wang, who argued the birthright citizenship case before the Supreme Court; a live taping of the Advisory Opinions podcast; and a discussion of the historical framework of birthright citizenship from Johns Hopkins professor Martha S. Jones.<\/p>\n

\n

At the Court<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n

Orders from the justices\u2019 June 18 conference are expected this morning at 9:30 a.m. EDT.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

The court has indicated that it will next release opinions tomorrow at 10 a.m. EDT. We will be live blogging that morning beginning at 9:30.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

The court has also identified Thursday as an opinion day. We will be live blogging that morning, as well.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Morning Reads<\/h2>\n
\n
\n

Supreme Court faces new wave of cases over state election laws<\/h3>\n

Maureen Groppe, USA Today<\/p>\n

\n

After hearing cases this term on campaign finance, mail-in ballots, and who has standing to challenge election rules, the Supreme Court could add more election cases \u201cto its plate for the fall as the political parties continue to fight over whether various voting rules prevent election chicanery or disenfranchise voters,\u201d according to USA Today. \u201cThe justices will be deciding in the coming days whether to review laws in Arkansas and Texas that voting rights groups say are illegally making it harder for people with limited English proficiency to vote. They\u2019ve also been asked by the Trump administration to revive voter registration rules in Arizona that lower courts said suppress the vote.\u201d And a fourth case addresses a Pennsylvania rule requiring residents voting by mail to date their ballot and not just sign it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

‘They have nowhere to turn’: Law students fight for workplace protections<\/h3>\n

Carrie Johnson, NPR<\/p>\n

\n

Emory University\u2019s Supreme Court Advocacy Program is putting a spotlight on federal judiciary employees, including interns and clerks, who faced discrimination or other wrongful conduct in the workplace and then had \u201cno clear way to complain or sue\u201d in a neutral, independent forum over how they were treated. The program \u201crecently petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to take up a case that challenges the internal system the judiciary uses to police itself,\u201d according to NPR. The asks whether that internal system \u201cgives workers due process and equal protection under the law.\u201d \u201cThe law student-drafted petition comes as misconduct in the judiciary is drawing renewed attention. This month, three federal judges in three different states came under scrutiny for their behavior off the bench.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Judges Say Threats to Family Erode Confidence in Judicial System<\/h3>\n

Jordan Fischer, Bloomberg Law<\/p>\n

\n

During a panel on Friday on judicial security, judges shared how their lives and work have changed amid an uptick in threats against members of the judiciary, including Supreme Court justices. U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom noted that \u201cthere have been more than 340\u201d threats to federal judges so far in 2026 and 564 total in 2025. \u201cIf the real goal is a long-term strategy to erode the trust and the integrity of the judicial system by discouraging people from entering into this particular part of our profession, the answer unfortunately is it\u2019s getting close to doing just that,\u201d said Judge Nancy Abudu, who sits on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. \u201cBloom said in her 32 years on the bench \u2014 including two decades as a state judge \u2014 she\u2019s never seen the tone and frequency of violent threats judges now receive.\u201d \u201cSecurity for federal judges is largely provided by the US Marshals Service, which earlier this year requested an additional $34 million in funding to keep up with the increased need for protective details for government officials,\u201d according to Bloomberg Law.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Federal judge sends Bayer’s $7.25 billion Roundup settlement back to Missouri state court<\/h3>\n

Dietrich Knauth, Reuters<\/svg><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

As Bayer awaits the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling in a case on whether the federal law governing pesticide labels protects it from lawsuits over not including a cancer warning on Roundup weedkiller, the company is celebrating a win before a different court. On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Henry Edward Autrey \u201csent Bayer\u2019s proposed $7.25 billion Roundup settlement back to state court … overruling objections from plaintiffs who had argued the state court had no power to implement a nationwide resolution of lawsuits that claim the company\u2019s Roundup weedkiller causes cancer,\u201d Reuters reported, noting that the decision \u201cis likely to bolster Bayer\u2019s efforts to win approval of the sweeping settlement.\u201d Bayer has pursued the settlement even though a Supreme Court ruling in its favor \u201ccould undercut many of the lawsuits currently pending against the company.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Analysis: What the missing center has meant for the Supreme Court<\/h3>\n

Joan Biskupic, CNN<\/p>\n

\n

In an analysis for CNN, Joan Biskupic explored how the court\u2019s conservative bloc has changed in recent years, particularly after the addition of Justice Amy Coney Barrett gave it a 6-3 supermajority \u201cfor the first time in modern history.\u201d \u201cThe spare vote for what\u2019s needed to produce a majority emboldened conservatives,\u201d according to Biskupic, leading to \u201creversals of milestone rulings\u201d on such issues as abortion, affirmative action, and redistricting. This \u201cemboldened\u201d approach stands in contrast to the pragmatic approach employed by \u201cconservative centrists\u201d like Justices Lewis Powell, Sandra Day O\u2019Connor, and Anthony Kennedy, who anchored the court and \u201cregularly sought a middle ground,\u201d Biskupic wrote.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Podcasts<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
Advisory Opinions<\/span><\/p>\n

SCOTUS Rules on Illegal Drug Users Owning Firearms<\/h3>\n

Sarah Isgur and David French react to the Supreme Court\u2019s opinions on appeal waivers and drugs and the Second Amendment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
Amarica’s Constitution<\/span><\/p>\n

Reverence and Radicalism: Remembering Gordon Wood<\/h3>\n

Tributes to late historian Gordon Wood have been pouring in, and Akhil Amar and Andy Lipka spent this episode reflecting on his peerless body of work. Professor Steven Calabresi, Gordon\u2019s neighbor, friend, and colleague, joins them for the discussion.<\/p>\n

Read more Divided court bars federal district court review of non-final state-court judgments<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
A Closer Look<\/div>\n

When Supreme Court Opinions Are Released<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Since we are in the heart of opinion season, we thought it would be helpful to revisit past Closer Looks on how SCOTUSblog covers opinion announcements. A version of this piece was originally published on March 20.<\/em><\/p>\n

As noted above, the court has indicated that it may announce opinions tomorrow and Thursday. You may be wondering where it made that announcement and (as we are frequently asked on the live blog) if we here at SCOTUSblog know which opinion(s) to expect.<\/p>\n

The answer to the second question is no: The Supreme Court\u00a0does not\u00a0announce ahead of time which cases will be decided on a particular day. Indeed, even the parties don\u2019t know in advance when they will get a ruling in their case. The only time we have a good sense of which opinions will be issued is the very last opinion day of the term (simply by process of elimination). Based on past practice, this day typically falls at the end of June, although we can\u2019t say for sure. (In 2024, for example, the final opinion day was in\u00a0early July.)<\/p>\n

As for opinion days, the court announces these \u2013 typically several days in advance \u2013 on the calendar on its\u00a0website, where they appear as\u00a0dark blue\u00a0\u201cnon-argument\u201d days (unless they overlap with a red argument day). The court also indicates in its \u201cToday at the Court\u201d feature that it \u201cmay\u201d announce opinions on that particular day.<\/p>\n

Earlier in the term, from November through April, the justices schedule opinion days as needed, almost always on previously scheduled argument days or on days when the justices were scheduled to take the bench to address other business, like Supreme Court Bar admissions. While the court can schedule an opinion day between sessions, its general practice has been not to do so. During May and June, the height of opinion season, there is usually at least one opinion day per week.<\/p>\n

During the COVID-19 pandemic, opinions were released only on the\u00a0court\u2019s website, but now, the justices are again in the courtroom to release them (although the courtroom audio is not available live). The court posts opinions on its website as the justices announce them in the courtroom.<\/p>\n

As stated above, the court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release. But the method it uses to number the opinions, known as the R-number system, serves as an unofficial but reliable signal that the court has released its final opinion for the day.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s how the system works: When opinions are eventually published in the U.S. Reports, the official bound version of the court\u2019s opinions, they are published chronologically, with the opinions for a particular day published in order of the justices\u2019 seniority. The R number, which appears to the left of the opinion date\/docket number\/case name on the court\u2019s website, refers to the order in which the opinion will appear in the U.S. Reports. But because opinions are announced in order of reverse seniority, the opinions on the court\u2019s website can\u2019t be assigned an R number until all of the opinions have been posted. So, the posting of the R numbers on the court\u2019s website is a sign that it has finished issuing opinions for that day.<\/p>\n

If a case is not decided by the end of the term, it will ordinarily be\u00a0reargued, although it is rare for the court to order this. Reargument usually only occurs when the justices consider a second round of argument necessary for either clarifying a legal issue raised in the case or reaching a consensus. This term, the only case to have been reargued was\u00a0Louisiana v. Callais<\/em>, in which the court curtailed a major provision of the Voting Rights Act.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>\n
\n
\n

JUSTICE\u00a0KAGAN:\u00a0\u201cMr.\u00a0Messenger,\u00a0I’m\u00a0not\u00a0sure\u00a0that\u00a0Justice\u00a0Scalia\u2019s\u00a0answer satisfies\u00a0his\u00a0own question.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more Court sides with challenger to law banning drug users from possessing guns<\/a><\/p>\n

(Laughter.)<\/p>\n

JUSTICE\u00a0SCALIA:\u00a0\u201cWhat\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u2013 what\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0question?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2014 (2014)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, we\u2019re expecting an order list this morning and opinion announcements tomorrow and Thursday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,23,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advisory-opinions","category-amaricas-constitution","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nA new wave of election cases - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A new wave of election cases - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, we\u2019re expecting an order list this morning and opinion announcements tomorrow and Thursday.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-22T13:13:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"A new wave of election cases\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-22T13:13:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220\"},\"wordCount\":1713,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Advisory Opinions\",\"Amarica's Constitution\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220\",\"name\":\"A new wave of election cases - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-22T13:13:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=220#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A new wave of election cases\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A new wave of election cases - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A new wave of election cases - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, we\u2019re expecting an order list this morning and opinion announcements tomorrow and Thursday.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-22T13:13:20+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"A new wave of election cases","datePublished":"2026-06-22T13:13:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220"},"wordCount":1713,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Advisory Opinions","Amarica's Constitution","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220","name":"A new wave of election cases - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-22T13:13:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=220#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A new wave of election cases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=220"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}