{"id":294,"date":"2026-06-30T12:40:46","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T12:40:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294"},"modified":"2026-06-30T12:40:46","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T12:40:46","slug":"the-last-grants-of-the-2025-26-term","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294","title":{"rendered":"The last grants of the 2025-26 term?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has \u201crelisted\u201d for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here.<\/em><\/p>\n

Read more Announcement of opinions for Tuesday, June 30<\/a><\/p>\n

Every summer, before the justices\u00a0leave town\u00a0for the Supreme Court\u2019s recess, they have one last impromptu conference in which they consider \u2013 and usually dispose of \u2013 all the cases relisted after their last scheduled conference. In recent years, that \u201cmop-up\u201d or \u201cclean-up\u201d conference has overwhelmingly happened\u00a0the day the court hands down the last opinions of the term. This year, it happened the day before the court handed down the last cases.<\/p>\n

The court had just 30 petitions and applications before them at the conference. Ten of them were new relists. Given the volume of cases and the shortness of time until the court will be issuing its next order list, I will have to be extremely summary.<\/p>\n

Another round of gun cases?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The court was holding a number of cases for United States v. Hemani<\/em>, which held that prohibiting a marijuana user from possessing firearms violated the Second Amendment. These cases all concerned whether laws prohibiting people under the age of 21 from possessing firearms violate the Second Amendment. They are National Rifle Association v. Glass<\/em>, McCoy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives<\/em>, West Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives<\/em>, Bivens v. Second Amendment Foundation<\/em>, and Picon v. United States<\/em>.<\/p>\n

After Hemani<\/em> was decided, they released those holds and considered these cases at the June 25 conference. That would frequently be enough if the court was simply going to grant the petitions, vacate the judgment below, and remand to the lower courts for further consideration in light of Hemani<\/em>. Maybe the justices simply need more time to decide what to do, or maybe they\u2019ve decided Hemani<\/em> won\u2019t provide sufficient guidance to the lower courts and they need to grant review in one of the new cases.<\/p>\n

Appeal waiver mop-up cases<\/strong><\/p>\n

These are not the most glamorous cases, but they\u2019re thematically related. On the same day Hemani<\/em> was decided, the court also decided Hunter v. United States<\/em>, holding that agreements criminal defendants make with the government not to appeal sentences are unenforceable when they would result in a \u201cmiscarriage of justice.\u201d Yesterday, the court for further consideration in light of Hunter<\/em>. But it needs a little more time with two of the cases, Jones v. United States<\/em> and . . . Jones v. United States<\/em>. I\u2019m not being careless (or at least not just being careless) \u2013 these really have the same caption. Nothing jumps out of the petitions from the Jones twins suggesting that the court will need to grant review to finish the work it started in Hunter<\/em>; I think they probably just need more time because of some particular aspect of those cases.<\/p>\n

An Epic sequel<\/strong><\/p>\n

Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc.<\/em> is the latest chapter in the antitrust fight Epic launched over the App Store back in 2020. After a 2021 trial, the district court enjoined Apple under California\u2019s unfair-competition law from barring app developers from telling customers about, and linking them to, cheaper ways to pay than through in-app purchases. The Supreme Court denied review of that injunction in 2024. Apple then filed a notice of compliance: it permitted links but imposed a 27% commission on link-out purchases and fenced them in with design and placement rules. The district court found that maneuver to be in civil contempt \u2013 and referred Apple and a testifying executive to federal prosecutors over testimony it considered false. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the contempt finding while sending the precise commission remedy back to the district court.<\/p>\n

Apple\u2019s raises two questions about the equitable power of the federal courts. The first is whether a party can be held in contempt for violating the \u201cspirit\u201d of an injunction that is silent about the conduct at issue, or whether contempt requires violating an order that clearly and unambiguously forbids it \u2013 a point on which Apple says the circuits are divided. The second is whether the 9th Circuit carved out an antitrust exception to last term\u2019s Trump v. CASA<\/em> by allowing an injunction Epic obtained for itself alone to sweep in millions of nonparty developers. Because the parties greatly expedited cert briefing to permit a decision before the court\u2019s summer recess (the petition, opposition, and reply were filed in under three weeks), would-be amici largely had to sit this case out, but Apple points to the heavy amicus turnout in the court of appeals as a measure of the importance of the issues.<\/p>\n

Another pork case<\/strong><\/p>\n

The court also has another challenge to a state pork-sales law. Triumph Foods v. Campbell<\/em> involves Massachusetts\u2019 law barring the sale of pork from breeding pigs confined in ways the state deems cruel. That obviously echoes National Pork Producers Council v. Ross<\/em>, but this case comes in a somewhat different posture: The challengers include a federally regulated pork processor and farmers, and their lead argument is that Massachusetts\u2019 law is preempted by the because it forces federally inspected facilities to segregate, track, process, and certify compliant pork. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit rejected that argument, reasoning that the law is a sales restriction rather than a regulation of slaughterhouse operations, and also rejected the challengers\u2019 dormant commerce clause theories (barring states from restricting interstate commerce). Triumph has also asked the court at least to GVR in light of the recent decision in , which construed similar \u201cin addition to or different from\u201d preemption language.<\/p>\n

Praying for a grant<\/strong><\/p>\n

Finally, Grand v. City of University Heights<\/em> is a religious-land-use case that began as a pro se petition but has since attracted enormous amicus support and a counseled reply by heavy hitter Josh Rosenkranz. Daniel Grand is an Orthodox Jew, and his faith requires him to pray with a group of 10 men. Because he cannot drive on the Sabbath, he invited others to his home for a minyan. After a neighbor complained, the city sent a cease-and-desist letter and told him he needed a special-use permit for a \u201cplace of religious assembly.\u201d Grand applied, then withdrew the application, and the lower courts held his First Amendment and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act claims unripe because the city never finally denied the permit. Grand asks whether the usual land-use finality requirement applies to claims that zoning threats chilled his religious exercise, or whether the injury was complete once the city told him to stop holding prayer gatherings at home.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s likely to be it for this term. Thanks for reading all these months. Hope to see you back here in the fall!<\/p>\n

New relists<\/strong><\/p>\n

National Rifle Association v. Glass<\/em>, 24-1185<\/p>\n

Issue:<\/strong> Whether Florida\u2019s law banning 18-to-20-year-olds from purchasing firearms violates the Second Amendment.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

McCoy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives<\/em>, 25-24<\/p>\n

Issues:<\/strong> (1) Whether federal laws banning 18- to 20-year-olds from purchasing handguns from federally licensed firearm dealers violates the Second Amendment\u2019s guarantee of the right to keep arms; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit erred by finding that the district court’s certification of a nationwide class action pursuant to\u00a0Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2)\u00a0constituted an abuse of discretion because the district court\u2019s certification came after it granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs but prior to its issuance of a final order.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

West Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives<\/em>, 25-132<\/p>\n

Issue: <\/strong>Whether a federal law that bans licensed sales of handguns and handgun ammunition to law-abiding 18-to-20-year-old adults violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

Jones v. United States<\/em>, 25-524<\/p>\n

Issue: <\/strong>Whether the only permissible exceptions to a general appeal waiver are for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or that the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

Grand v. City of University Heights, Ohio<\/em>, 25-965<\/p>\n

Issue:<\/strong> Whether the First Amendment’s established chilling-effect doctrine, under which a credible government threat that deters the exercise of fundamental rights constitutes a complete and independently actionable constitutional injury, is displaced by\u00a0Williamson Cty. Planning v. Hamilton Bank<\/em>\u2019s land-use finality requirement when a plaintiff alleges that government threats both before and after a Planning Commission meeting chilled religious exercise, worship, and assembly.<\/p>\n

Read more Justices\u2019 financial disclosures reveal Bad Bunny concert tickets, plenty of travel in 2025<\/a><\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

Triumph Foods, LLC v. Campbell<\/em>, 25-1047<\/p>\n

Issues: <\/strong>(1) Whether the\u00a0Federal Meat Inspection Act\u00a0imposes additional or different \u2013 even if non-conflicting \u2013 requirements on pork producers, and is thus preempted by the FMIA under principles of express or implied preemption; and (2) whether the FMIA violates the dormant commerce clause or the other constitutional doctrines sufficiently pleaded in the complaint.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc.<\/em>, 25-1311<\/p>\n

Issues: <\/strong>(1) Whether a court may hold a party in civil contempt based on a violation of an injunction\u2019s \u201cspirit\u201d where the injunction is silent as to the conduct upon which contempt is based, or, instead, whether a court must ground a finding of civil contempt on the violation of an order that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has properly created an \u201cantitrust\u201d or \u201ccompetition\u201d exception to Trump v. CASA, Inc.,<\/em>\u00a0and the longstanding equitable principles on which\u00a0CASA<\/em>\u00a0rests, or otherwise disregarded\u00a0CASA<\/em>\u2019s limits.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

Bivens v. Second Amendment Foundation<\/em>, 24-1329<\/p>\n

Issue:<\/strong> Whether firearms laws imposing a minimum age of 21 violate the purported Second Amendment rights of 18-to 20-year-olds.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

Picon v. United States<\/em>, 25-5713<\/p>\n

Issue:<\/strong> Whether the Second Amendment\u2019s guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms applies fully to 18-20-year-olds.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

Jones v. United States<\/em>, 25-6136<\/p>\n

Issues: <\/strong>(1) whether the appellate review waiver in petitioner\u2019s plea agreement bars his claim of constitutional error under United States v. Davis<\/em>; and (2) whether petitioner\u2019s appellate-review waiver is unenforceable under the miscarriage-of-justice exception.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the June 25 conference.)<\/p>\n

Returning Relists<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gator\u2019s Custom Guns, Inc. v. Washington<\/em>, 25-153<\/p>\n

Issue: <\/strong>Whether ammunition feeding devices with the capacity to hold more than ten rounds are \u201cArms\u201d presumptively entitled to constitutional protection under the plain text of the Second Amendment.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the Dec. 5, Dec. 12, Jan. 9, Jan. 16, Jan. 23, Feb. 20, Feb. 27, Mar. 6, Mar. 20, Mar. 27, Apr. 2, Apr. 17, Apr. 24, May 1, May 14, May 21, May 28, June 4, June 11, June 18, and June 25 conferences.)<\/p>\n

Duncan v. Bonta<\/em>, 25-198<\/p>\n

Issues:<\/strong> (1) Whether a ban on the possession of exceedingly common ammunition feeding devices violates the Second Amendment; and (2) whether a law dispossessing citizens, without compensation, of property that they lawfully acquired and long possessed without incident violates the takings clause.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the Dec. 5, Dec. 12, Jan. 9, Jan. 16, Jan. 23, Feb. 20, Feb. 27, Mar. 6, Mar. 20, Mar. 27, Apr. 2, Apr. 17, Apr. 24, May 1, May 14, May 21, May 28, June 4, June 11, June 18, and June 25 conferences.)<\/p>\n

Viramontes v. Cook County<\/em>, 25-238<\/p>\n

Issue<\/strong>: Whether the Second and 14th Amendments guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the Dec. 5, Dec. 12, Jan. 9, Jan. 16, Jan. 23, Feb. 20, Feb. 27, Mar. 6, Mar. 20, Mar. 27, Apr. 2, Apr. 17, Apr. 24, May 1, May 14, May 21, May 28, June 4, June 11, June 18, and June 25 conferences.)<\/p>\n

National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont<\/em>, 25-421<\/p>\n

Issue<\/strong>: Whether a ban on the possession of AR-15-style rifles and firearm magazines with a capacity in excess of 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the Feb. 20, Feb. 27, Mar. 6, Mar. 20, Mar. 27, Apr. 2, Apr. 17, Apr. 24, May 1, May 14, May 21, May 28, June 4, June 11, June 18, and June 25 conferences.)<\/p>\n

Grant v. Higgins<\/em>, 25-566<\/p>\n

Issue<\/strong>: Whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to possess semiautomatic rifles that are in common use for lawful purposes, including the AR-15.<\/p>\n

(Relisted after the Feb. 20, Feb. 27, Mar. 6, Mar. 20, Mar. 27, Apr. 2, Apr. 17, Apr. 24, May 1, May 14, May 21, May 28, June 4, June 11, June 18, and June 25 conferences.)<\/p>\n

Read more Court agrees to hear six new cases, including dispute over proof of citizenship to vote<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has \u201crelisted\u201d for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. Read more Announcement of opinions for Tuesday, June 30 Every summer, before the justices\u00a0leave town\u00a0for the Supreme Court\u2019s recess, they have one last impromptu conference in which they consider \u2013 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":82,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interesting"],"yoast_head":"\nThe last grants of the 2025-26 term? - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The last grants of the 2025-26 term? - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has \u201crelisted\u201d for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. Read more Announcement of opinions for Tuesday, June 30 Every summer, before the justices\u00a0leave town\u00a0for the Supreme Court\u2019s recess, they have one last impromptu conference in which they consider \u2013 […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T12:40:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"The last grants of the 2025-26 term?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T12:40:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294\"},\"wordCount\":2025,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/e773292dd0c6b55fa2621f397d6050bf.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Interesting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294\",\"name\":\"The last grants of the 2025-26 term? - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/e773292dd0c6b55fa2621f397d6050bf.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T12:40:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/e773292dd0c6b55fa2621f397d6050bf.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/e773292dd0c6b55fa2621f397d6050bf.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=294#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The last grants of the 2025-26 term?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The last grants of the 2025-26 term? - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The last grants of the 2025-26 term? - American Service Review","og_description":"The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has \u201crelisted\u201d for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. Read more Announcement of opinions for Tuesday, June 30 Every summer, before the justices\u00a0leave town\u00a0for the Supreme Court\u2019s recess, they have one last impromptu conference in which they consider \u2013 […]","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T12:40:46+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"The last grants of the 2025-26 term?","datePublished":"2026-06-30T12:40:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294"},"wordCount":2025,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/e773292dd0c6b55fa2621f397d6050bf.jpg","articleSection":["Interesting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294","name":"The last grants of the 2025-26 term? - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/e773292dd0c6b55fa2621f397d6050bf.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-30T12:40:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/e773292dd0c6b55fa2621f397d6050bf.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/e773292dd0c6b55fa2621f397d6050bf.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=294#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The last grants of the 2025-26 term?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=294"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/82"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}