{"id":309,"date":"2026-06-30T17:40:16","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T17:40:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309"},"modified":"2026-06-30T17:40:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T17:40:16","slug":"court-grants-several-new-cases-including-on-whether-the-second-amendment-protects-possession-of-semiautomatic-rifles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309","title":{"rendered":"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Less than a week after the Supreme Court struck down a Hawaii law that barred gun owners with concealed-carry licenses from bringing guns onto private property unless they had explicit permission from the property\u2019s owner, the justices announced that they will weigh in on the constitutionality of bans on AR-15s and other semiautomatic rifles.<\/p>\n

Read more Justices strike down campaign finance law<\/a><\/p>\n

The announcement came as part of a from the justices\u2019 conference on Monday, June 29. That conference, which is colloquially known as the \u201cclean-up conference,\u201d has traditionally served as an opportunity for the justices to dispose of any petitions for review that may have been on hold until they issued opinions on the merits in cases presenting similar issues. But in recent years, the court has also used the conference as one last opportunity to add new cases to its docket for the following term, as it did on Tuesday.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court last year turned down a request to weigh in on a challenge to the constitutionality of a Maryland law banning semiautomatic rifles like the AR-15. Three justices \u2013 Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch \u2013 indicated in Snope v. Brown<\/em> that they would have granted the challengers\u2019 petition for review, while a fourth justice \u2013 Brett Kavanaugh \u2013 described the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit upholding the ban as \u201cquestionable.\u201d Kavanaugh wrote that the Supreme Court \u201cshould and presumably will address the AR-15 issue soon, in the next Term or two.\u201d<\/p>\n

Just over a year later, Kavanaugh\u2019s prediction came to fruition. In a brief order on Tuesday, the justices agreed to take up both an Illinois man\u2019s challenge to Cook County\u2019s ban on semiautomatic rifles and a challenge by gun owners and gun-rights groups to a similar law in Connecticut. The cases will be argued together, most likely in the fall.<\/p>\n

The Illinois case was brought by Cutberto Viramontes, who went to federal court in Chicago in 2021 to argue that the county\u2019s prohibition violates his Second Amendment right to bear arms. The lower courts upheld the law, pointing to a 2023 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in Bevis v. City of Naperville<\/em> that rejected a similar challenge. In Bevis<\/em>, the 7th Circuit explained in Viramontes\u2019 case, the court of appeals had ruled that the plaintiffs seeking preliminary relief had not shown \u201cthat the covered firearms materially differed from machineguns and military-grade weaponry, which the Supreme Court instructed can be banned under the Second Amendment.\u201d And nothing in the Supreme Court\u2019s Second Amendment cases, the 7th Circuit continued, provided any reason to overrule Bevis<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Viramontes to the Supreme Court in August, asking the justices to take up his case. He argued that the court should \u201cguarantee fundamental Second Amendment rights and \u2026 address the confusion in the lower courts over how to apply this Court\u2019s precedent in arms bans cases\u2014precedent that is straightforward but that the lower courts have proven incapable of applying correctly.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cook County the justices to deny review, pointing to what it characterized as the lethality of assault rifles and the absence from the record in the case \u201cof even a single instance in which assault weapons were ever<\/em> used in lawful self-defense.\u201d And that lethality, the county continued, also \u201cdeter[s] effective, prompt law enforcement intervention\u201d when such weapons are used in mass shootings. But in any event, the county concluded, this dispute is not an appropriate one to address the legality of the ban on semiautomatic rifles because Viramontes \u201csimply did not bother to compile a record sufficient to support his constitutional challenge,\u201d opting instead to \u201close fast and seek review in\u201d the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

Connecticut passed the law at the center of Grant v. Higgins<\/em> in the wake of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, in which a 20-year-old, after killing his mother at her home, murdered 20 first-graders and six adults.<\/p>\n

A federal court in Connecticut turned down the challengers\u2019 request to temporarily block the state from enforcing the ban, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit upheld that ruling. It reasoned that the ban \u201cimpose[s] targeted restrictions on unusually dangerous weapons while preserving numerous legal alternatives for self-defense and other lawful purposes.\u201d Moreover, it added, it \u201cimpose[s] a burden comparable to historical antecedents that regulated other unusually dangerous weapons unsuitable for and disproportionate to the objective of individual self-defense.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more Court rules that states can exclude transgender athletes from girls\u2019 and women\u2019s sports teams<\/a><\/p>\n

The challengers , asking the justices to decide whether the ban can stand. They argued that, under the court\u2019s prior decisions, \u201ca firearm cannot be banned if it is in common use for lawful purposes. If the most popular rifle in the country is not in common use,\u201d they said, \u201cit is hard to see what that phrase could possibly mean.\u201d<\/p>\n

The state that the prevalence of semiautomatic rifles does not mean that they are immune from restrictions. \u201cThe Second Amendment,\u201d it argued, \u201cdoes not bar states from banning particularly dangerous weapons that are neither used nor useful for self-defense just because manufacturers flood the market before states respond. That is especially true when the weapons\u2019 unique dangers are brought to the fore by new societal developments nobody predicted when the technology came out, like the current mass shooting epidemic.\u201d<\/p>\n

The justices turned down a group of requests to weigh in on the constitutionality of restrictions on the gun rights of young people under the age of 21. The challengers had argued that such restrictions violate the Second Amendment rights of 18- to 20-year-olds. Thomas indicated that he would have granted review in one of those cases \u2013 West Virginia Citizens Defense League v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives<\/em>, involving a federal law that bans the commercial sale of handguns to anyone under the age of 21.<\/p>\n

The justices apparently did not act on other gun-rights cases that it had been considering at its conferences for several months, involving challenges to bans on large-capacity magazines \u2013 that is, devices that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition that can be fed into a semi-automatic weapon.<\/p>\n

In addition to the gun-rights cases, the justices also granted review in two additional cases: Grand v. City of University Heights<\/em>, in which an Orthodox Jewish man in Ohio is asking the court to revive his religious-discrimination lawsuit against city officials who told him he needed a permit to host a prayer group in his home; and Apple v. Epic Games<\/em>, in which Apple has asked the court to weigh in on how clear a court order must be before a litigant can be held in contempt for violating it.<\/p>\n

Finally, the court turned down the Trump administration\u2019s request to clear the way for it to fire the top U.S. copyright official, Shira Perlmutter, after a lower court ordered the government to temporarily reinstate her.<\/p>\n

The head of the U.S. Copyright Office is known as the Register of Copyrights, and she is the primary adviser to Congress on copyright issues. The Register of Copyrights is housed within the Library of Congress; she is appointed by the\u00a0Librarian of Congress, who is in turn nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate to serve a 10-year term.<\/p>\n

Perlmutter went to federal court, seeking to block her removal. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., turned down her request for an order that would temporarily reinstate her while her challenge to her firing continued. But in\u00a0, a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted that request, and on Monday the Supreme Court declined to intervene. In a brief, unsigned order, the court indicated that its decision not to interfere \u201cis not a ruling on the merits of the legal issues presented in the litigation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more Supreme Court strikes down Trump\u2019s order ending birthright citizenship<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Less than a week after the Supreme Court struck down a Hawaii law that barred gun owners with concealed-carry licenses from bringing guns onto private property unless they had explicit permission from the property\u2019s owner, the justices announced that they will weigh in on the constitutionality of bans on AR-15s and other semiautomatic rifles. Read […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":308,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-court-news"],"yoast_head":"\nCourt grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Less than a week after the Supreme Court struck down a Hawaii law that barred gun owners with concealed-carry licenses from bringing guns onto private property unless they had explicit permission from the property\u2019s owner, the justices announced that they will weigh in on the constitutionality of bans on AR-15s and other semiautomatic rifles. Read […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T17:40:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T17:40:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309\"},\"wordCount\":1351,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/b6bb45486c0dd972e89f556f30aa49a6.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"COURT NEWS\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309\",\"name\":\"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/b6bb45486c0dd972e89f556f30aa49a6.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T17:40:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/b6bb45486c0dd972e89f556f30aa49a6.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/b6bb45486c0dd972e89f556f30aa49a6.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=309#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles - American Service Review","og_description":"Less than a week after the Supreme Court struck down a Hawaii law that barred gun owners with concealed-carry licenses from bringing guns onto private property unless they had explicit permission from the property\u2019s owner, the justices announced that they will weigh in on the constitutionality of bans on AR-15s and other semiautomatic rifles. Read […]","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T17:40:16+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles","datePublished":"2026-06-30T17:40:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309"},"wordCount":1351,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/b6bb45486c0dd972e89f556f30aa49a6.jpg","articleSection":["COURT NEWS"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309","name":"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/b6bb45486c0dd972e89f556f30aa49a6.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-30T17:40:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/b6bb45486c0dd972e89f556f30aa49a6.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/b6bb45486c0dd972e89f556f30aa49a6.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=309#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}