{"id":329,"date":"2026-07-02T15:11:24","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T15:11:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329"},"modified":"2026-07-02T15:11:24","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T15:11:24","slug":"an-immigration-law-error-in-the-courts-asylum-decision-threatens-immigration-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329","title":{"rendered":"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Supreme Court\u2019s decision last week blocking migrants stopped at the international boundary from applying for asylum turns on the text of federal immigration law. But the majority opinion reveals that the justices don\u2019t understand the border-crossing process that Congress created. Perhaps if they had, the justices in the majority wouldn’t have so easily handed border officers the power to seal off access to asylum.<\/p>\n

Read more After Slaughter and Cook: future Fed fights, and maybe some midnight firings<\/a><\/p>\n

The court\u2019s decision in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado<\/em> addresses facets of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the federal law governing migration, that apply when a person arrives at a U.S. land border crossing. Government officials staffing the border crossing interview everyone who arrives and, after a brief conversation and search of government databases, allow most people to proceed into the United States.<\/p>\n

But when border crossing officers believe that someone lacks a legal basis for staying in the United States, they have multiple options available. Migrants can be detained at the border briefly and then released into the United States using a legal authority called parole. Alternatively, border officers can transfer migrants into the custody of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which can then release them or transfer them to one of its hundreds of immigration detention facilities. These options have one thing in common: the migrant is in the United States while the immigration legal process, including an opportunity for a hearing before an immigration judge, winds its course. Since 1996, border officers have had a third option available: quickly remove some migrants \u2013 except anyone who expresses fear for their safety \u2013 from the United States without involving the immigration courts. Anyone removed under the fast-track procedure, called expedited removal, is barred from returning for at least five years.<\/p>\n

Writing for his colleagues in , Justice Samuel Alito inverted the basic legal structure that governs border-processing decisions. Instead of most people remaining in the United States, either in ICE\u2019s custody or released on parole, while awaiting a court date, Alito suggested, incorrectly, that border officers quickly force most people out of the country. A border officer first decides whether a migrant is barred from entering the United States \u201con grounds related to, among other things, national security, foreign-policy concerns, and the alien\u2019s health or criminal activity,\u201d Alito explained. Anyone deemed inadmissible \u201cmust generally\u201d be removed \u201cwithout further hearing\u201d through expedited removal, he wrote.<\/p>\n

Alito is wrong. Expedited removal does not apply to everyone who is inadmissible. Despite his claim, people who border officers believe to be inadmissible for the reasons he listed are not, in fact, subject to expedited removal. Fast-track removal applies only to people who are excludable from the United States for two reasons: because they misrepresented an important fact to try to get into the United States or because they showed up at the border without a valid passport or visa. Indeed, Congress specified as much in the first half of the sentence that Alito quoted. But by ignoring the half of the sentence that limits expedited removal\u2019s reach, the majority suggests that Congress gave border officers much more power than it did.<\/p>\n

Read more What we learned about the court this term: an animated explainer<\/a><\/p>\n

Congress did not create a legal system in which immigration judges only hear asylum claims by people who border officers suspect of inadmissibility. Instead, immigration law makes the immigration courts a central stop in the legal process for people who officers believe have violated most provisions of immigration law. There is good reason for this. For all their flaws, immigration judges are expected to act as neutral decision makers. Rather than demand that officials staffing busy border-crossing offices make complicated, high-stakes legal assessments on the spot while a queue forms ahead of them \u2013 increasing the risk of error \u2013 Congress put immigration judges in that role. As one federal appellate court explained, it\u2019s the job of immigration judges \u201cto fully develop the record.\u201d And if a migrant or the federal government doesn\u2019t like the immigration judge\u2019s decision, they can do what migrants who are quickly expelled can\u2019t: appeal.<\/p>\n

\u201cJustice Alito\u2019s statement would take away from people seeking to enter the country \u2014 and some people already in it \u2014 their only opportunity to have their case heard by a neutral adjudicator,\u201d Jonathan Weinberg, Distinguished Professor of Law at Wayne State University told me. \u201cInstead, it would allow border officials to eject anyone seeking to enter the country, and impose a five-year bar on their returning, on the basis of their own mere say-so untethered in law,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

By suggesting that border officers are empowered to perform quick legal reviews and subject to summary removal people deemed inadmissible for most reasons, the court might lead ordinary people to believe that immigration courts are the exception rather than the rule. It might also entice executive branch officials to push immigration courts to the fringe of legal decision-making. Either should be an unwelcome outcome that the majority can correct by revising its opinion.<\/p>\n

Indeed, the majority\u2019s misunderstanding of this basic feature of immigration legal processes may have paved the way for its decision. As described by Alito, border officers are the central figures in border-area legal decisions and immigration judges are only bit players. Handing border officers the authority to stop migrants at the border and, consequently, block them from starting the asylum application process extends the broad power that the majority wrongly thinks they possess. But if the majority had understood border processing correctly, it might have been less reluctant to give border officers the power to make on-the-spot, life-or-death decisions, instead leaving that role to immigration judges who hear from lawyers, review evidence, and are required to make neutral decisions that can then be appealed.<\/p>\n

Read more The Stat Pack is back<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court\u2019s decision last week blocking migrants stopped at the international boundary from applying for asylum turns on the text of federal immigration law. But the majority opinion reveals that the justices don\u2019t understand the border-crossing process that Congress created. Perhaps if they had, the justices in the majority wouldn’t have so easily handed […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":34,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary"],"yoast_head":"\nAn immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court\u2019s decision last week blocking migrants stopped at the international boundary from applying for asylum turns on the text of federal immigration law. But the majority opinion reveals that the justices don\u2019t understand the border-crossing process that Congress created. Perhaps if they had, the justices in the majority wouldn’t have so easily handed […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T15:11:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T15:11:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329\"},\"wordCount\":994,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/3e2283f29245e536add52afa51cc3ef7.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Commentary\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329\",\"name\":\"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/3e2283f29245e536add52afa51cc3ef7.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T15:11:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/3e2283f29245e536add52afa51cc3ef7.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/3e2283f29245e536add52afa51cc3ef7.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=329#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts - American Service Review","og_description":"The Supreme Court\u2019s decision last week blocking migrants stopped at the international boundary from applying for asylum turns on the text of federal immigration law. But the majority opinion reveals that the justices don\u2019t understand the border-crossing process that Congress created. Perhaps if they had, the justices in the majority wouldn’t have so easily handed […]","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T15:11:24+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts","datePublished":"2026-07-02T15:11:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329"},"wordCount":994,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3e2283f29245e536add52afa51cc3ef7.jpg","articleSection":["Commentary"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329","name":"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3e2283f29245e536add52afa51cc3ef7.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-02T15:11:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3e2283f29245e536add52afa51cc3ef7.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3e2283f29245e536add52afa51cc3ef7.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=329#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An immigration law error in the court\u2019s asylum decision threatens immigration courts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=329"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/329\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/34"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}