{"id":358,"date":"2026-07-09T13:11:53","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T13:11:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358"},"modified":"2026-07-09T13:11:53","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T13:11:53","slug":"trump-wants-court-to-rehear-birthright-citizenship-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358","title":{"rendered":"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case"},"content":{"rendered":"

Thanks to all who joined us at our term-in-review event yesterday at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Center in Washington, D.C., which was presented by the ACLU. Scroll to the Closer Look section below for a brief overview of the discussion.<\/p>

Read more Revisiting which Supreme Court cases are actually the most important<\/a><\/p>

Plus, we\u2019re now just one week away from the LinkedIn Live event featuring SCOTUSblog\u2019s Amy Howe and Briefly\u2019s Adam Stofsky, which will begin at noon EDT on Thursday, July 16. They will discuss the most consequential decisions of the 2025-26 term. Register here.<\/p>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Trump announces long-shot bid to get Supreme Court to rehear birthright citizenship case<\/h3>

Dan Mangan, CNBC<\/p>

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump announced that he would seek \u201cto get the Supreme Court to rehear the case in which it ruled against his executive order that sought to sharply restrict birthright citizenship,\u201d according to CNBC. \u201cI will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don\u2019t change their absolutely insane decision,\u201d Trump wrote on Truth Social. CNBC noted that the court \u201chas not agreed to rehear a ruling of a case already argued since 1965.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Judge orders release of $5.8M Trump owes E. Jean Carroll<\/h3>

Ashleigh Fields, The Hill<\/p>

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan on Wednesday rejected President Donald Trump\u2019s request to delay payment of nearly $5.8 million to E. Jean Carroll until after the Supreme Court reconsidered the president\u2019s appeal of the jury verdict, which came in a sexual abuse and defamation case filed by Carroll. \u201cKaplan said Carroll should receive the funds, which were placed in an escrow account while Trump appealed,\u201d according to The Hill. \u201cTrump\u2019s lawyers appealed Kaplan\u2019s ruling less than an hour after it was issued.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Bayer seeks to end federal Roundup litigation after Supreme Court win<\/h3>

Dietrich Knauth, Reuters<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

On June 25, the Supreme Court sided with Bayer in a long-running dispute over pesticide labels, holding \u201cthat plaintiffs cannot sue Bayer by arguing that Roundup\u2019s warning label failed to warn users about cancer risks.\u201d Now, the company is seeking \u201cto convince a federal judge to dismantle the federal litigation that consolidates nearly 4,000 lawsuits alleging that its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer,\u201d contending that the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling \u201cshould lead to the dismissal of the consolidated federal litigation,\u201d according to Reuters. \u201cPlaintiffs\u2019 attorneys countered that the Supreme Court ruling was limited to Roundup\u2019s label, and does not affect the viability of other claims commonly asserted in Roundup personal injury lawsuits, such as design defect and negligence claims.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

\u2018Oyez, oyez.\u2019 Supreme Court\u2019s last official crier is dead at 102.<\/h3>

Cole Reynolds, The Washington Post<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

From 1952 to 1962, George Hutchinson cried \u201cOyez, oyez, oyez\u201d in the courtroom to \u201cannounce[] the arrival of the justices.\u201d \u201cHutchinson, who died June 14 at 102, was the last crier of the U.S. Supreme Court, tasked with carrying out ceremonial duties that were later turned over to the court marshal,\u201d according to The Washington Post. Hutchinson first \u201cjoined the court in 1938 as a page, one of the knicker-clad young people who would assist the justices.\u201d After serving in the Army during World War II, \u201che rejoined the court, working out of the marshal\u2019s office and eventually taking the job of crier, which dates to the Supreme Court\u2019s first meeting in 1790.\u201d In that role, he would not only call the court to order, but also oversee the pages and pass messages to the justices during sessions, including baseball scores. \u201cWhile working at the Supreme Court, Mr. Hutchinson went to school part time, earning a law degree at George Washington University and ultimately becoming a member of the Supreme Court Bar.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

After Supreme Court ruling, what’s next in fight over trans athletes?<\/h3>

Maureen Groppe, USA Today<\/p>

In its June 30 ruling on transgender athletes, \u201c[t]he Supreme Court left open the question of whether states are required \u2013 rather than merely allowed \u2013 to keep transgender women and girls off female teams,\u201d according to USA Today. \u201cThat legal issue is separately working its way up to the high court,\u201d as are related disputes \u201cover bathroom and locker room access for trans students.\u201d \u201cWhat that means is that we can continue to advocate for the rights of transgender students under Title IX in other areas,\u201d said Chris Erchull, an attorney at GLAD Law, to USA Today. Conservative groups, on the other hand, are prepared to continue pushing back against these efforts. \u201cBlue states with boys on girls\u2019 podiums … you\u2019re next,\u201d said Kristen Waggoner, president of the Alliance Defending Freedom, in a social media post last week.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Why the Roberts Court Makes Easy Cases So Hard<\/h3>

Jesse Wegman, Major Questions with Jesse Wegman<\/p>

In a post for his Substack, Jesse Wegman reflected on the court\u2019s 5-4 ruling in Trump v. Barbara<\/em>, the birthright citizenship case, exploring why the decision turned out to be so close. \u201cThe answer in this case was that four of the right-wing justices were willing to entertain a novel, convoluted reading of the phrase \u2018subject to the jurisdiction thereof\u2019 and to ignore or explain away more than a century and a half of settled law,\u201d Wegman contended, adding that it is one of several recent cases in which several justices have appeared to put \u201c\u2018off the wall\u2019 arguments \u2018on the wall.\u2019\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

The Supreme Court\u2019s quiet coup<\/h3>

By Christopher A. Coons, David Beier, & Ray Brescia<\/p>

In a column for SCOTUSblog, Sen. Christopher A. Coons, David Beier, and Ray Brescia highlighted recent Supreme Court rulings on voting rights laws, administrative expertise, and executive authority over independent agencies, contending that, with these decisions and others, \u201cthe Roberts Supreme Court is systematically stripping away power from Congress.\u201d<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

Revisiting which Supreme Court cases are actually the most important<\/h3>

By Eric McKee<\/p>

In a column for SCOTUSblog, Eric McKee reflected on how best to determine which cases are the most important, building on his previous suggestion to simply count the number of \u201cfriend of the court\u201d briefs that were filed. His refined method involves weighting the brief filers \u201cby how often the court has actually cited them\u201d in order to de-emphasize briefs that are merely \u201cexpressive\u201d and \u201cbreak[] no new ground.\u201d Based on this, McKee found that \u201conly a third of the very top cases \u2013 and only about a fifth of all above-median cases \u2013 were decided along ideological lines.\u201d<\/p>

Read more The Supreme Court\u2019s quiet coup<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Amarica\u2019s Constitution<\/span>

Unitary Duality – Guests Steven Calabresi and Vikram Amar<\/h3>

The Supreme Court recently ruled in two cases framing unitary executive theory. So it\u2019s entirely appropriate that Akhil Amar and Andy Lipka are joined by two experts on the topic \u2013 Steve Calabresi and Vik Amar \u2013 to discuss it.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A Closer Look<\/div>

SCOTUSblog\u2019s 2025-26 Term-in-review Event<\/h3><\/div>

Our term-in-review event on Wednesday at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Center was all about key takeaways from a blockbuster term, such as the role of history in the birthright citizenship ruling and the status of the Roberts court.<\/p>

The event began with a fireside chat between Zach Shemtob, SCOTUSblog\u2019s executive editor, and Cecillia Wang, the ACLU\u2019s national legal director. Wang, who argued the birthright citizenship case before the Supreme Court, described that experience, as well as other major cases from the term that the ACLU was involved in, including the disputes over the Voting Rights Act, transgender athletes, the Second Amendment rights of habitual drug users, and the Temporary Protected Status program.<\/p>

Wang said that, on a scale of 1 to 10, she was at \u201c99\u201d in terms of nerves before the birthright citizenship argument, but that the anxiety fell away once she was actually standing in front of the justices. She also noted that it \u201cdidn\u2019t matter\u201d to her that President Donald Trump attended the argument, becoming the first sitting president to do so, because she felt his attendance \u201chad nothing to do with\u201d her and \u201ceverything to do with his agenda to put the justices on the spot and put the solicitor general on the spot.\u201d Wang further explained that she had done plenty of moots as part of her preparation and was not surprised by any of the justices\u2019 questions. If anything, Wang remarked, she was surprised that the discussion \u201cstayed at a pretty high level in terms of principles.\u201d It was as if everyone involved in the argument knew that the \u201cAmerican public and the world\u201d was listening, Wang said.<\/p>

The second session of Wednesday\u2019s event featured Johns Hopkins professor Martha S. Jones, whose research into views on birthright citizenship in early America was cited by multiple justices in the birthright citizenship case. Jones noted that \u201chistory mattered a great deal in the ways in which the court came to think about\u201d that case, emphasizing that justices not only integrated the work of contemporary historians into their writings, but \u201calso read the primary materials that were in our footnotes.\u201d \u201cTo me, this was a remarkable insight into how deep the court was willing to go to interrogate, understand, and incorporate history into what they did,\u201d Jones said.<\/p>

The event ended with a live taping of the Advisory Opinions podcast, hosted by Sarah Isgur. Isgur was joined by David French, law professor Akhil Amar, and David Lat. Together, they discussed whether it\u2019s best to review the work of the court term-by-term or across a longer time horizon and how debates over the separation of powers came to dominate conversations about the court (at times crowding out debates about culture war issues).<\/p>

The group also wrestled with the court\u2019s relationship with historical research, emphasizing the justices\u2019 growing use of originalism, a method of constitutional interpretation focused on the text of the Constitution and the history of its enactment and amendments. Isgur closed out the conversation by asking if the tariffs case or the case on the president\u2019s authority to remove the heads of independent agencies was the <\/em>big case of the term. Amar and French said tariffs, noting that it articulated the boundaries of congressional and presidential power, while Lat went with Trump v. Slaughter<\/em>, arguing that it will have a profound effect on the federal government, whereas Trump might successfully re-impose tariffs based on alternative statutes.<\/p>

Stay tuned for additional coverage of the event in the coming days.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE BREYER: \u201cIn Morales, since I can mock my own opinions, I wrote at the end, \u2018it’s not \u2013 when it’s too tenuous, remote or peripheral.\u2019 That’s singularly unhelpful.\u201d<\/p>

Read more Kagan and Barrett to testify before Congress<\/a><\/p>

(Laughter.)<\/p>

JUSTICE BREYER: \u201cIt seems to \u2013 there \u2013\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cI thought so at the time.\u201d<\/p>

(Laughter.)<\/p>

JUSTICE BREYER: \u201cYes, you were right.\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 (2013)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, a brief overview of our term-in-review event.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-amaricas-constitution-2","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nTrump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, a brief overview of our term-in-review event.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-09T13:11:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/75fb100141f34ac63be2bbfb4d831088.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-09T13:11:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358\"},\"wordCount\":1803,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Amarica\u2019s Constitution\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358\",\"name\":\"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-09T13:11:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=358#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, a brief overview of our term-in-review event.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-07-09T13:11:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/75fb100141f34ac63be2bbfb4d831088.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case","datePublished":"2026-07-09T13:11:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358"},"wordCount":1803,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Amarica\u2019s Constitution","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358","name":"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-09T13:11:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=358#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}