{"id":410,"date":"2026-07-21T13:09:08","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T13:09:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410"},"modified":"2026-07-21T13:09:08","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T13:09:08","slug":"the-ripple-effects-of-the-tps-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410","title":{"rendered":"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"

Do you have a young Supreme Court nerd in your life? After pointing them to children\u2019s books by the current justices, consider checking out A Supreme Friendship, a new book on Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia and the importance of \u201cnot letting strong differences get in the way of a good friendship.\u201d<\/p>

Read more Supreme Court agrees to hear case on whether airplane was improperly seized for transporting a six-pack of beer<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

As part of a regularly scheduled , the Supreme Court announced on Monday that Jouppi v. Alaska<\/em>, an Alaskan bush pilot\u2019s challenge to the forfeiture of his $95,000 airplane over a six-pack of beer, had been taken up for argument during the 2026-27 term. For more on the dispute, see the On Site section below.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

TPS Update: DHS Warns of \u2018Last Opportunity\u2019 After Supreme Court Ruling<\/h3>

Dan Gooding, Newsweek<\/p>

In a series of social media posts on Friday, James Percival, general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security, urged \u201cthose with an expiring … designation\u201d under the Temporary Protected Status program \u201cto accept $2,600 and a free flight home\u201d \u2013 the benefits available to TPS holders who \u201cself-deport before their legal status officially lapses,\u201d according to Newsweek. Hundreds of thousands of TPS holders are expected to lose their legal status after the Supreme Court on June 25 held that the Trump administration could end removal protections for Syrian and Haitian nationals and cleared the way for the Trump administration to more broadly scale back the TPS program. Newsweek noted that \u201c[b]usiness organizations, labor unions, and immigrant advocacy groups have warned that the administration\u2019s decision to end work authorization for many TPS holders could have sweeping consequences for both workers and the U.S. economy.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Court Drops Order Preserving Yemenis\u2019 Deportation Protections<\/h3>

Andrew Kreighbaum, Bloomberg Law<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

Judge Dale E. Ho has \u201cagreed to lift an order blocking the Trump administration\u2019s termination of Temporary Protected Status for 2,800 Yemeni nationals in the US,\u201d according to Bloomberg Law. \u201cHo found that he was bound by a US Supreme Court decision last month holding that decisions on the program are off limits from judicial review. His May 1 order had kept protections in place while a challenge played out over the termination for Yemen.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Trump calls for review after climate manual for judges withdrawn<\/h3>

Zach Schonfeld, The Hill<\/p>

In a Truth Social post on Sunday, President Donald Trump demanded review \u201cof an updated judges\u2019 manual that he claims the left improperly influenced,\u201d according to The Hill. \u201cThese Manuals have been totally DISCREDITED,\u201d Trump wrote. \u201cOur Nation\u2019s Federal Judges deserve Facts and Science, not Political Fraud and False Science on Climate.\u201d The president\u2019s comments come after \u201ca controversial climate science chapter\u201d was removed from \u201cthe updated \u2018Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence,\u2019 which federal judges use to aid them in cases involving complex scientific topics,\u201d and after Justice Elena Kagan, who wrote the foreword for the manual, was asked about that chapter\u2019s removal during her congressional testimony last week. Kagan said \u201cshe hadn\u2019t read the chapter … and insisted the judge who managed the project is working to avoid a repeat.\u201d \u201cI know that she is engaged with members of Congress about … how to make sure that the processes that the Federal Judicial Center uses [to produce the manual] are good ones and that a situation like this does not come up again,\u201d Kagan said.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

\u2018Top Gun\u2019 Magazine Article Heirs Appeal Spiked Paramount Lawsuit to Supreme Court<\/h3>

Casey Loving, The Wrap<\/p>

In a petition for review filed earlier this month, \u201c[t]he heirs to a 1983 magazine article that inspired the original \u2018Top Gun\u2019 film\u201d urge the justices to take up their claim that Paramount violated copyright law by making \u201cTop Gun: Maverick,\u201d a sequel to the original film, without first re-securing the rights to draw on the article in their work, according to The Wrap. \u201cThe plaintiffs are the heirs of Ehud Yonay, who wrote an article titled \u2018Top Guns\u2019 for California Magazine that earned him a \u2018story by\u2019 credit for the original film.\u201d They contend that the movie\u2019s sequel also relies on Yonay\u2019s work, but a federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit that the family \u201cfailed to establish a triable issue as to substantial similarity, as required to establish copyright infringement.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The Supreme Court grapples with a new era of political violence<\/h3>

Alec Dent and Dan Merica, The Washington Post<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

For The Washington Post\u2019s Early Brief newsletter, Alec Dent and Dan Merica revisited Justice Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett\u2019s testimony to Congress on the court\u2019s growing security needs, exploring how political violence is affecting the justices\u2019 work. \u201cFor most of its history, the Supreme Court has had the least visibility of the branches of government and, as a result, has required the least security,\u201d they wrote. \u201cBut threats against Supreme Court justices have increased significantly in the last decade,\u201d and it\u2019s affecting more than just the nine current justices. SCOTUSblog\u2019s Sarah Isgur told Dent and Merica that \u201cthe effect of the threats is actually to deter future people from taking these jobs.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
Court News<\/span>

Supreme Court agrees to hear case on whether airplane was improperly seized for transporting a six-pack of beer<\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

The court on Monday added a new case to its oral argument docket for the 2026-27 term. The justices agreed to review Jouppi v. Alaska, an Alaskan bush pilot\u2019s challenge to the forfeiture of his $95,000 airplane \u2013 which prosecutors sought on the theory that he must have known that one of his passengers was bringing a six-pack of beer into an Alaskan village where alcohol is prohibited. That forfeiture, pilot Ken Jouppi contends, violates the Eighth Amendment\u2019s ban on excessive fines.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

When it comes to getting the Supreme Court\u2019s attention, does one state have an edge?<\/h3>

By Kelsey Dallas<\/p>

A SCOTUSblog analysis of the 35 argued cases with a single person (who was not a government official sued in their professional capacity) or family on one side of the \u201cv.\u201d found that five of these disputes centered on Texans. The next-closest states on this metric can claim only two. What explains why Texas stood out this term \u2013 and why the state often looms large at the court?<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
A Closer Look<\/div>

When was the chief not in the majority this term?<\/h3><\/div>

Chief Justice John Roberts was in the majority of the time in merits cases this term (tied with Justice Brett Kavanaugh for the top spot). Given that the court released , that 95% figure translates to exactly three cases in which Roberts was on the dissenting side. Notably, the chief did not write a separate opinion in any of them (all six opinions he authored this term were majority opinions), meaning that in each of the three cases he joined a dissent written by someone else \u2013 twice by Justice Samuel Alito and once by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.<\/p>

Read more When it comes to getting the Supreme Court\u2019s attention, does one state have an edge?<\/a><\/p>

Roberts\u2019 first non-majority vote (chronologically by opinion release date) came in Hencely v. Fluor Corporation<\/em>, a case stemming from a 2016 Taliban attack at a U.S. base where an Army specialist was injured and later sued the military contractor under state law. During oral argument, the justices were \u201cbroadly skeptical\u201d of the contractor\u2019s assertion that it was immune from liability under prior Supreme Court precedent.<\/p>

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the six-justice majority (including Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, plus Justices Neil Gorsuch and Barrett), holding that military contractors do not have absolute immunity for negligence in an active war zone. Roberts dissented alongside Alito and Kavanaugh, with Alito\u2019s dissent arguing that \u201cthis state-law tort case is preempted by the Constitution\u2019s grant of war powers exclusively to the Federal Government \u2026 this state-law tort suit is not the way to give petitioner what he is due.\u201d<\/p>

Roberts\u2019 next time breaking with the majority came in the late-May opinion release of Hamm v. Smith<\/em>, an Alabama death penalty case about intellectual disability and IQ testing thresholds under 2002\u2019s Atkins v. Virginia<\/em>, which held that the Eighth Amendment prevents the execution of intellectually disabled persons. Rather than clarify how the lower courts should handle conflicting test results about one\u2019s IQ, the court dismissed the case as improvidently granted (that is, it should not have been taken up in the first place) without explaining the vote. In response, Alito a 24-page dissent joined by Thomas (who also wrote a dissent), along with Roberts and Gorsuch in part.<\/p>

Alito\u2019s dissent argued the court should have provided \u201cworkable rules\u201d for weighing multiple IQ scores, writing that the DIG \u201cwill have regrettable consequences. Without clear rules for determining when multiple IQ scores are dispositive, nearly every\u00a0Atkins<\/em>\u00a0case will devolve into an amorphous, individualized determination of whether the defendant meets an imprecisely defined notion of \u2018significantly subaverage intellectual functioning\u2019 under which the role of IQ is not clearly articulated.\u201d (Roberts and Gorsuch did not join Part II of Alito\u2019s dissent, which called for the justices to \u201creverse the lower courts\u2019 erroneous analysis of Smith\u2019s scores and remand for a fresh consideration of his Atkins<\/em> claim using any sound method.\u201d)<\/p>

Roberts\u2019 third non-majority vote came in T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp.<\/em> Split 5-4, the justices held that the Rooker-Feldman<\/em> doctrine, which prevents federal district courts from reviewing state-court judgments, applies even when the state-court judgment is not final. Sotomayor wrote the majority opinion, joined by Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Jackson. Thomas wrote a concurring opinion.<\/p>

Barrett dissented and was joined by Roberts, Kagan, and Gorsuch, arguing that Rooker-Feldman<\/em> doctrine \u201cstands on shaky ground.\u201d \u201cIn the end,\u201d Barrett wrote (in reference to her colleagues\u2019 majority opinion), \u201cRooker-Feldman<\/em> has been given an inch \u2013 it should not be allowed to take a mile.\u201d<\/p>

What can we make of the few cases in which Roberts dissented? First, while certainly significant to the parties involved, none of these could be considered the \u201cbig cases\u201d of the term (at least based on how they came out). Second, these decisions were all quite technical, dealing with federal court jurisdiction, questions of immunity, and competing conceptions of the court\u2019s death penalty jurisprudence. Finally, this pattern is nothing new: In the 2024-25 term, Roberts was in the majority, you guessed it, , closely trailed by Kavanaugh (92%) and Barrett (89%).<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

MR. STEWART: \u201cLet me give you my most extreme answer, and then let me give you a \u2013 a backup answer. The most extreme answer is the criminal alien who is detained for more than six months, unlike every other form of detention that are \u2013 is discussed in the briefs, that alien always has the option of terminating the detention by accepting a final order of removal and returning home.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE KAGAN: \u201cI take it that that’s your most extreme answer because it doesn’t sound all that good.\u201d<\/p>

Read more Almost Half of Americans View SCOTUS as Political<\/a><\/p>

\u2014 \u00a0(2017)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, the justices added a case involving a seized plane and a six-pack of beer to next term\u2019s oral argument docket.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-from-the-scotusblog-team","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nThe ripple effects of the TPS ruling - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, the justices added a case involving a seized plane and a six-pack of beer to next term\u2019s oral argument docket.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-21T13:09:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/92a9ef9c13c62c913835fc33d43e8a5a.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-21T13:09:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410\"},\"wordCount\":1860,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"From the SCOTUSblog Team\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410\",\"name\":\"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-21T13:09:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=410#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, the justices added a case involving a seized plane and a six-pack of beer to next term\u2019s oral argument docket.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-07-21T13:09:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/92a9ef9c13c62c913835fc33d43e8a5a.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling","datePublished":"2026-07-21T13:09:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410"},"wordCount":1860,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["From the SCOTUSblog Team","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410","name":"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-21T13:09:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=410#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The ripple effects of the TPS ruling"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=410"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/410\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}