{"id":415,"date":"2026-07-22T13:09:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-22T13:09:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415"},"modified":"2026-07-22T13:09:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-22T13:09:33","slug":"judicial-ethics-in-the-spotlight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415","title":{"rendered":"Judicial ethics in the spotlight"},"content":{"rendered":"

As of this morning, the court has 25 cases scheduled for oral argument in the 2026-27 term. That\u2019s behind where it was at this point last year (31 cases) and in 2024 (27) but ahead of the term before that (21).<\/p>

Read more The history the court would rather not see<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

In case you missed it, the court released the of three summer order lists on Monday and announced that it will hear argument during the 2026-27 term in Jouppi v. Alaska<\/em>, an Alaskan bush pilot\u2019s challenge to the forfeiture of his $95,000 airplane over a six-pack of beer. The second summer order list is scheduled to be released on Aug. 17.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Judicial Ethics Proposals on Financial Conflicts, FOIA Revived<\/h3>

Suzanne Monyak, Bloomberg Law<\/p>

Sen. Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, has reintroduced \u201ca trio of bills that would crack down on conflicts of interest and allow public records requests into the federal judiciary, as part of a push to increase transparency in the federal courts,\u201d according to Bloomberg Law. \u201cTwo of the bills aim to prevent Supreme Court justices and lower court judges from handling litigation in which they have a financial interest. The measures would expand conflicts of interest rules that apply to the executive branch to the judiciary and require justices and judges to put certain financial assets in a blind trust.\u201d \u201cThe Democrat-led bills face slim odds of passage in the Republican-controlled Congress,\u201d but they add to an already active debate over \u201cstrengthening ethics rules for the judiciary.\u201d Bloomberg Law noted that \u201c[l]awmakers pressed Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett on the high court ethics code during the justices\u2019 appearances before House and Senate spending committee panels on July 14.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Trump to Impose 50% Tariff on Many Canadian Goods<\/h3>

Ana Swanson and Ian Austen, The New York Times<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

On Monday, President Donald Trump \u201csigned orders to impose a 50 percent tariff on a wide range of Canadian goods, … including wine, hockey sticks, cement, dairy products, plywood, paper and furniture,\u201d according to The New York Times. \u201cThe new tariffs will be imposed under an obscure legal provision, Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which Congress wrote as the Great Depression deepened. The law allows the president to put tariffs of up to 50 percent on imports from countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce uniquely, as compared to other countries.\u201d \u201cAdministration officials said the taxes were punishment for Canadian discrimination against three U.S. industries: motor vehicles, dairy and alcohol.\u201d The New York Times noted that the Trump \u201cadministration is preparing to issue more global tariffs, perhaps as soon as this week,\u201d as it continues to rebuild the tariff regime struck down by the Supreme Court in February.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Want Supreme Court Term Limits? Here\u2019s How to Do It<\/h3>

Jesse Wegman, Major Questions with Jesse Wegman<\/p>

In a post for his Substack, Jesse Wegman explored the Brennan Center\u2019s \u201cnew memo on Supreme Court term limits,\u201d which \u201cmakes the case for why Congress has the power\u201d under the Constitution\u2019s necessary and proper clause \u201cto institute term limits through federal statute, no constitutional amendment required.\u201d Congress could impose \u201c18-year terms for justices, followed by a shift to senior status. Senior justices would no longer sit on the nine-member Court. Instead, their duties would change to include sitting by designation on lower federal courts.\u201d \u201cWhen Congress was in the business of actually using its legislative powers over the Supreme Court, it relied on [the necessary and proper] clause all the time: to set the number of justices, or the Court\u2019s jurisdiction, or the timing of its term, and so on,\u201d Wegman observed, contending that \u201ccourt reformers should see the Constitution as a friend, not a foe.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Fifth Circuit to consider whether the federal ban on firearm possession violates the Commerce Clause<\/h3>

Chris Geidner, Law Dork<\/p>

In a post for his Substack, Chris Geidner highlighted the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit\u2019s decision \u201cto have the full court review the constitutionality of the federal ban on firearm possession by a person previously convicted of a felony\u201d under the commerce clause, rather than the Second Amendment. The announcement comes after Justice Clarence Thomas called for lower courts to take up that question in his solo concurrence in . Indeed, 5th Circuit Judge Stephen Higginson pointed to Thomas as the inspiration behind his colleagues\u2019 order in his opinion dissenting from the order granting rehearing en banc. Geidner, echoing Higginson, described the 5th Circuit\u2019s order as \u201ca wild escalation of how quickly courts are seeking to move the law rapidly to the right.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The Lines the Court Won\u2019t Cross<\/h3>

Aziz Huq, The Atlantic<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

In a column for The Atlantic, Aziz Huq reflected on the Roberts court\u2019s relationship with the Trump administration, contending that the court\u2019s rulings against two of President Donald Trump\u2019s \u201csignature policy initiatives, birthright citizenship and global tariffs,\u201d stem not from \u201ca moderate turn\u201d or \u201csense of true independence,\u201d but from the president\u2019s departure from the court\u2019s \u201cconstitutional vision.\u201d That vision, according to Huq, includes \u201ctransform[ing] the First Amendment\u201d to reduce restrictions on campaign spending and religious practices, \u201ceviscerat[ing] the equal-protection clause, and recalibrat[ing] the Constitution\u2019s balance of powers\u201d by giving the executive branch more power. \u201cThe lesson for the White House from this term is not that the Court is suddenly an adversary,\u201d Huq wrote. \u201cIt is that the justices have little patience for impulsive, erratic swerves by a president who will be gone in three years, especially when accommodating his whims undermines their longer-term constitutional vision.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
Contributor Corner<\/span>

The history the court would rather not see<\/h3>

By Daniel Harawa<\/p>

In his Civil Rights and Wrongs column, Daniel Harawa reflected on the \u201chistory-and-tradition test\u201d that the Supreme Court has brought to Second Amendment disputes, contending that it has bred confusion and frustration. This term, Harawa wrote, a case on a Hawaii gun law raised yet another still-unanswered question: What should a court do when the relevant history is morally abhorrent? The court, according to Harawa, \u201chas no clear answer.\u201d<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

Heller and Bruen are here to stay <\/h3>

By Pete Patterson<\/p>

In a column for SCOTUSblog, Pete Patterson analyzed the court\u2019s two Second Amendment rulings from the 2025-26 term, reflecting on how they built on past gun rights cases holding that \u201cthe amendment protects an individual right, that the right applies to the states, and that alleged violations of the right are to be assessed by a text-and-history approach.\u201d<\/p>

Read more Heller and Bruen are here to stay<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Advisory Opinions<\/span>

Defy the Gods<\/h3>

Sarah Isgur and David French discuss Messi flags and The Odyssey in 4D (not IMAX!) before diving into legal topics such as the politics at the Supreme Court, defamation and cancellation at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, and why the Hawaii Supreme Court is wrong.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Ask Amy<\/h3><\/div>

Q: The court numerous petitions to rehear cases on Monday. Should we read anything into its failure to act on President Donald Trump\u2019s petition for rehearing in Trump v. Carroll<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>

A: It\u2019s a fair question. Trump\u2019s original petition for review was first distributed for the justices\u2019 Feb. 20, 2026, conference, but the court rescheduled it a whopping 15 times<\/em> before it was finally considered four months later, at the June 25 conference, and denied on June 29.<\/p>

But so far, at least, we can\u2019t read too much into the lack of either a grant or a denial to rehear the petition in Carroll<\/em>. Although the 19 petitions for rehearing that were were filed over the course of nearly six months, from Jan. 26 to June 17, most of them were filed in May (7) or June (6). And the docket for all of those 19 petitions indicates that they were distributed to the justices\u2019 chambers on June 24.<\/p>

By contrast, Trump\u2019s was not officially filed until July 8, two weeks after June 24. Moreover, there is no indication on the electronic docket for Trump v. Carroll<\/em> that the rehearing petition has been distributed yet \u2013 or any hint of when it will be.<\/p>

Once it is distributed, however, the odds that the court will actually reconsider its denial of review are low, with the most recent one dating back to 2018.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

MR. DUNAU: \u201cNow I think Your Honor will find though when your wife goes shopping, she is not just picking up that meat at the counter. She is ringing a little bell when she doesn’t find what she wants and there’s a butcher poking his head through a little cubby hole saying what can I do for you ma’am and she says, I want some kind of a rump roast that’s not here and she gets it that way.\u201d<\/p>

MR. CLARK: \u201cWell, I have rung those bells and they don’t open many doors.\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. Jewel Tea Co.<\/em> (1965) <\/p>

Read more The ripple effects of the TPS ruling<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, the Trump administration continues to rebuild its tariff regime.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,22,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advisory-opinions","category-contributor-corner","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nJudicial ethics in the spotlight - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Judicial ethics in the spotlight - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, the Trump administration continues to rebuild its tariff regime.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-22T13:09:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/f84152d4a085a5a0a40ee344100b605f.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Judicial ethics in the spotlight\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-22T13:09:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415\"},\"wordCount\":1504,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Advisory Opinions\",\"Contributor Corner\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415\",\"name\":\"Judicial ethics in the spotlight - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-22T13:09:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=415#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judicial ethics in the spotlight\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Judicial ethics in the spotlight - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Judicial ethics in the spotlight - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, the Trump administration continues to rebuild its tariff regime.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-07-22T13:09:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1500,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/f84152d4a085a5a0a40ee344100b605f.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Judicial ethics in the spotlight","datePublished":"2026-07-22T13:09:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415"},"wordCount":1504,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Advisory Opinions","Contributor Corner","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415","name":"Judicial ethics in the spotlight - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-22T13:09:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=415#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judicial ethics in the spotlight"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/415","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=415"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/415\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}