{"id":435,"date":"2026-07-27T13:11:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T13:11:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435"},"modified":"2026-07-27T13:11:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T13:11:33","slug":"new-tariffs-new-lawsuits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435","title":{"rendered":"New tariffs, new lawsuits"},"content":{"rendered":"

Save the date for The SCOTUSblog Summit: 2026 Term Preview on Sept. 16, 2026. More details to come.<\/p>

Read more The Constitutional Court of South Africa<\/a><\/p>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Small businesses sue Trump administration to stop latest wave of tariffs on 60 trade partners<\/h3>

Steve Kopack, NBC News<\/p>

On Friday, a group of small businesses challenged the Trump administration\u2019s \u201clatest wave of tariffs on 60 U.S. trade partners, less than one day after they were enacted,\u201d according to NBC News. \u201cThe suit was filed by the Liberty Justice Center, the same organization that challenged Trump\u2019s tariffs enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act last year and won a major ruling against the government at the Supreme Court.\u201d \u201cFiled in the Court of International Trade in New York, the suit seeks to stop the government from enforcing or collecting duties imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. … The complaint alleges that the U.S. Trade Representative \u2018acted arbitrarily and capriciously by imposing near-uniform tariffs across 60 materially different economies without a reasoned, record-based explanation for how the tariffs would address the practices [the trade representative] identified.\u2019\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Vernon Hills toy manufacturer sues Trump administration again over new round of tariffs<\/h3>

Robert Channick, Chicago Tribune<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

In a separate tariffs challenge, \u201cLearning Resources, the Vernon Hills [Illinois] toymaker that successfully brought down the Trump administration\u2019s 2025 tariffs in a seminal Supreme Court decision,\u201d also filed a lawsuit in the Court of International Trade against the Trump administration, according to the Chicago Tribune. \u201cThe lawsuit filed Friday alleges that the Trump administration has tried \u2018to re-create materially the same global tariff regime\u2019 under three different statutes, but concludes that the \u2018third time\u2019s not the charm\u2019 for the federal government.\u201d Elana Ruffman, chief marketing officer at Learning Resources, told the Tribune that \u201cLearning Resources has received about $10 million of the $12 million\u201d in tariff refunds it expected after the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Why Alito is the most frequent Supreme Court justice to recuse<\/h3>

Zach Schonfeld, The Hill<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

During the 2025-26 term, \u201cSupreme Court justices recused a combined 64 times this term when deciding what new cases to hear,\u201d according to The Hill. Among those, 23 \u201ccame from Justice Samuel Alito, a leading voice in the court\u2019s conservative majority who is stepping aside at a rate threefold compared to any of his colleagues.\u201d The Hill noted that \u201cAlito\u2019s direct stock holdings are the main culprit. Most of the other justices keep their assets largely tied up in index funds and other diversified investment vehicles. But Alito owns shares directly in 27 companies.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

DHS accuses ‘rogue’ Clinton judge of open defiance of Supreme Court<\/h3>

Elaine Mallon, Fox News<\/p>

James Percival, the general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security, took to social media on Friday to accuse a \u201crogue district judge\u201d of \u201copen defiance of the Supreme Court.\u201d The post addressed U.S. District Judge Patti Saris\u2019 Thursday decision to temporarily block the Trump administration\u2019s \u201ceffort to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for South Sudan despite a recent Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed lower courts\u2019 authority to intervene,\u201d according to Fox News. Saris \u201cgranted an administrative stay in African Communities Together v. Mullin, preserving TPS protections for South Sudanese nationals while she considers whether plaintiffs may amend their lawsuit and seek renewed relief on constitutional grounds.\u201d \u201cSaris stressed that the order is a procedural measure to preserve the status quo while the court considers the plaintiffs\u2019 latest filings and is not a ruling on the merits.\u201d \u201cThe temporary order keeps South Sudan\u2019s TPS protections in place for now, but the 1st Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court could soon weigh in.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Appeals Court Upholds Blocks on Trump Order Restricting Mail Voting<\/h3>

Adam Sella, The New York Times<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

On Saturday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit \u201cupheld a lower-court ruling blocking key parts of an executive order from President Trump to restrict voting by mail,\u201d which \u201ccalled on the Department of Homeland Security to compile state-by-state lists of citizens to help determine voter eligibility, and called on the Postal Service to verify voters based on the lists provided by the states,\u201d according to The New York Times. The 1st Circuit \u201cwrote that Mr. Trump\u2019s order \u2018directs unprecedented levels of involvement by federal officials in how states administer elections,\u2019\u201d and risks \u201csow[ing] confusion\u201d and preventing eligible voters from casting ballots. \u201cLawyers representing the government said in recent court filings that they may challenge the [appeals] court\u2019s ruling at the Supreme Court.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

Is Elena Kagan the stare decisis justice? <\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

In a 2015 case on the royalties from the patent for a Spider-Man toy, Justice Elena Kagan wrote an opinion for the majority that likely is best remembered for its discussion of stare decisis, the principle that courts should generally not overturn their earlier rulings unless there is a very good reason to do so. Since then, she has been perhaps the staunchest defender of precedent on the court.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

The Constitutional Court of South Africa<\/h3>

By Zachary Shemtob<\/p>

For SCOTUSblog\u2019s series on different supreme courts around the world, Zach spoke with Penelope Andrews, a professor of law at New York Law School, about the Constitutional Court of South Africa.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Amarica\u2019s Constitution<\/span>

The Surprising Score<\/h3>

The SCOTUS term is behind us, and Akhil Amar and Andy Lipka are taking a look back \u2013 not just at this term, but at the entirety of the Roberts court. The cases may be familiar, but their look back may surprise you.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A Closer Look<\/div>

The Supreme Court\u2019s \u201cterminology nightmare\u201d<\/h3><\/div>

The interim docket. The emergency docket. The shadow docket. The stay docket. The equity docket. The other docket. The docket that cannot be named. All of these labels and more have been used to describe the segment of the Supreme Court\u2019s work that centers on requests for emergency relief, requests that are typically addressed with only limited briefing, no oral argument, and unsigned, often unexplained decisions.<\/p>

The debate over what to call this docket stems from a broader \u2013 and more contentious \u2013 debate over what actually happens on it, particularly in cases involving the executive branch. Since President Donald Trump began his second term in January 2025, the court has addressed more than two dozen emergency applications from his administration regarding policy moves put on hold by lower courts \u2013 and sided with the president much of the time. These orders, while technically temporary, had long-term, and sometimes permanent, consequences. They cleared the way for large-scale layoffs in the federal government, funding cuts, and deportations, among other changes, and did so without always offering explanation as to why Trump had prevailed.<\/p>

Read more Is Elena Kagan the stare decisis justice?<\/a><\/p>

Given the debate they\u2019ve generated, it was no surprise that these interim\/emergency\/shadow docket decisions came up multiple times when Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett testified about the Supreme Court\u2019s fiscal year 2027 budget request before House and Senate subcommittees on July 14. Although subcommittee members had been instructed to keep their questions focused on the court\u2019s budget proposal, several asked for information about emergency\/interim orders, including about why the court seems to be releasing so many such decisions these days.<\/p>

For the most part, Barrett\u2019s responses to these questions focused on the unique nature of requests for such relief. Unlike the oral argument docket, which the justices curate by assessing and then voting on petitions for review, this other docket is not discretionary, Barrett explained. The court must make a decision on every application it receives, and therefore, the size of the docket depends on the actions of potential applicants, not the actions of the court.<\/p>

Kagan shared a slightly different view, observing that the court likely creates more work for itself when it grants high-profile requests for relief. \u201cWhen people know that relief is available, there are a lot of smart lawyers out there in the world who are going to say why don\u2019t we take our shot at that,\u201d she told the Senate subcommittee.<\/p>

Kagan also repeatedly engaged with the idea that there are \u201cdownsides\u201d to this docket. It can be difficult to respond to applications after only limited briefing and in the absence of oral argument, she said, and the justices also don\u2019t always agree on the process that should be followed. However, Kagan added that she no longer thinks it is appropriate \u2013 \u201cat least not now\u201d \u2013 to refer to the docket as the shadow docket, which is the label most often used by critics of how the court approaches emergency applications and of its unexplained responses to them. \u201cI think if you had asked me this question a year ago, I might have said that there were some cases \u2013 and, in fact, I did say, I had said in some public events … where we did so little explanation of what lay behind our order that lower courts had a great deal of difficulty trying to figure out what that order was,\u201d Kagan told the House subcommittee. \u201cI don\u2019t think that that\u2019s so much a problem anymore.\u201d<\/p>

But Kagan\u2019s comments made clear that the debate over what to call this docket likely won\u2019t be resolved anytime soon. She said the justices themselves don\u2019t agree on its name: \u201cThere are definitely issues with respect to the emergency \u2013 we call it the emergency docket. Some of us call it the interim docket. It\u2019s a terminology nightmare.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE KAGAN: \u201cBut this is not a side issue, Mr. Shah. In fact, you used your understanding of 1089(e) as an argument to produce that the result this Court reached in Smith<\/em>, so it was \u2013 it was not a very large issue, but it was \u2013 it was an argument. \u2026\u201d<\/p>

MR. SHAH: \u201cWell, Your Honor, I don’t agree with that characterization. The government’s argument would have been identical, with or without 1089(e). But I don’t want to quibble about \u2013\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE KAGAN: \u201cIt was a supportive argument. I am not saying that it was the but-for argument, but it was clearly a supportive argument in your brief.\u201d<\/p>

MR. SHAH: \u201cYour Honor, if you want to read it that way, I think that’s fine. I think \u2013\u201d<\/p>

Read more Justice Kagan says court gets a \u201cbad rap\u201d<\/a><\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cWhy \u2013 why else was it there? Just for fun?\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 \u00a0(2013)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, mark your calendars for the 2026 SCOTUSblog Summit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-amaricas-constitution-2","category-from-the-scotusblog-team","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nNew tariffs, new lawsuits - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New tariffs, new lawsuits - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, mark your calendars for the 2026 SCOTUSblog Summit.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-27T13:11:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/a214caca0d6cb9222bdd5f828c99d8bd.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"New tariffs, new lawsuits\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-27T13:11:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435\"},\"wordCount\":1740,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Amarica\u2019s Constitution\",\"From the SCOTUSblog Team\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435\",\"name\":\"New tariffs, new lawsuits - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-27T13:11:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=435#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New tariffs, new lawsuits\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New tariffs, new lawsuits - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New tariffs, new lawsuits - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, mark your calendars for the 2026 SCOTUSblog Summit.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-07-27T13:11:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/a214caca0d6cb9222bdd5f828c99d8bd.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"New tariffs, new lawsuits","datePublished":"2026-07-27T13:11:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435"},"wordCount":1740,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Amarica\u2019s Constitution","From the SCOTUSblog Team","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435","name":"New tariffs, new lawsuits - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-27T13:11:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=435#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New tariffs, new lawsuits"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=435"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}