{"id":445,"date":"2026-07-28T13:10:43","date_gmt":"2026-07-28T13:10:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445"},"modified":"2026-07-28T13:10:43","modified_gmt":"2026-07-28T13:10:43","slug":"the-ongoing-battle-over-tps-status","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445","title":{"rendered":"The ongoing battle over TPS status"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ever wondered what happened to well-known Supreme Court plaintiffs after their cases came to an end? Today, we\u2019re launching a new series of Closer Looks exploring that very topic.<\/p>

Read more Trump administration asks Supreme Court to clear the way for new mail-in voting restrictions<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

On Monday, the Trump administration came to the Supreme Court on its emergency docket and asked the justices to clear the way for full implementation of President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order on mail-in voting. For more on the dispute, see the On Site section below.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Inside the fights to maintain TPS status for thousands after the Supreme Court sided with Trump<\/h3>

Devan Cole, CNN<\/p>

One \u201cmonth after the Supreme Court curtailed lower courts\u2019 ability to block the Trump administration from revoking temporary deportation protections,\u201d people who stand to lose those protections are still engaged in legal battles, in part because \u201cthe justices left the door open for TPS beneficiaries to bring constitutional challenges to the administration\u2019s actions,\u201d according to CNN. \u201cIn recent days, legal advocates representing … migrants from a handful of countries have either repackaged their earlier procedural arguments into new constitutional claims or signaled plans to do so soon.\u201d \u201cThe constitutional claims are being made under the 5th Amendment\u2019s Due Process Clause, which says the government cannot deprive a person of their \u2018life, liberty or property\u2019 without first following protocols and procedures laid out in federal law.\u201d Meanwhile, the Trump \u201cadministration has claimed that the Supreme Court decision fully blessed its actions revoking the TPS designations.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Employers Fear Labor Shortage as Many Immigrants Lose Protected Status<\/h3>

Miriam Jordan and Madeleine Ngo, The New York Times<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

As legal battles over the Temporary Protected Status program continue, business leaders and lawmakers are looking for alternative ways to allow TPS beneficiaries to continue working after they lose their work permits under the program. \u201c[B]usiness organizations, led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have mounted a campaign for action on Capitol Hill, joined by a growing number of state and local leaders from both parties,\u201d according to The New York Times. \u201cCongress can, and should, exercise its plenary authority over immigration policy to prevent significant disruption to America\u2019s work force and avoid an unnecessary humanitarian crisis,\u201d read a July 10 letter from the Chamber of Commerce to Senate leadership.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Attorneys for Florida death row inmates seek stays of execution from U.S. Supreme Court<\/h3>

Mitch Perry, Florida Phoenix<\/p>

\u201cBarring a last-hour intervention by the U.S. Supreme Court, two Florida death row inmates,\u201d James Aren Duckett and Dominick Occhicone, \u201cwill be executed within hours of each other Tuesday at Florida State Prison,\u201d according to the Florida Phoenix. Duckett has been on Florida\u2019s death row for more than 30 years \u201cafter being convicted of murdering 11-year-old Teresa McAbee in 1987.\u201d Occhicone was convicted in 1987 for the double murder \u201cof his girlfriend\u2019s parents, Martha and Raymond Artzner.\u201d \u201cAttorneys for both inmates filed for stays of execution Saturday with the U.S. Supreme Court.\u201d If those requests are denied, Duckett and Occhicone will become the 11th and 12th inmates executed this year in Florida, which is responsible for \u201cmore than half of all executions in the United States since January 2025.\u201d \u201cAt 80, Occhicone would be the second-oldest man executed since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Citing \u2018common sense,\u2019 James Comey\u2019s team urges judge to toss seashells case<\/h3>

Ryan J. Reilly, NBC News<\/p>

In April, former FBI director James Comey \u201cwas indicted by a grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina. … Prosecutors argued that an image he posted online of seashells grouped in the formation of the numbers \u201886 47\u2019 was a threat against the president.\u201d Now, attorneys for \u201cComey have asked a federal judge to dismiss\u201d the case, \u201carguing that \u2018dictionaries, context, precedent, and common sense\u2019 gut the Trump administration\u2019s claim,\u201d according to NBC News. \u201cThe Supreme Court has rejected threats prosecutions based on speech far more directly threatening than Mr. Comey\u2019s seashells post here,\u201d the attorneys wrote in their . The DOJ\u2019s response to Comey\u2019s motions to dismiss are due by Aug. 18.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Sheldon Whitehouse\u2019s Court-Packing Plan Is Unconstitutional<\/h3>

Dan McLaughlin, National Review<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

In a column for the National Review, Dan McLaughlin took aim at a Democratic \u201cto expand the Supreme Court to a maximum of 18 justices, with presidents appointing new justices in the first and third years of their terms without a vacancy on the Court,\u201d and to \u201csideline the most senior current justices from ruling on most of the Court\u2019s docket.\u201d McLaughlin described the bill as \u201cradical and dangerous\u201d and contended that it violates the Constitution, because, in his view, barring senior justices from hearing most of the court\u2019s docket would amount to stripping them of life tenure on the court.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
Court News<\/span>

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to clear the way for new mail-in voting restrictions<\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

The Trump administration on Monday asked the Supreme Court to allow it to fully implement an executive order signed by President Donald Trump that seeks to impose additional restrictions on mail-in voting. U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer called an order by a federal judge in Massachusetts that paused portions of the order in 23 states and the District of Columbia \u201cextraordinary,\u201d and he argued that it \u201cflouts settled\u201d doctrines governing when courts can weigh in on a dispute.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUSblog Events<\/span>

Announcing The SCOTUSblog Summit: 2026 Term Preview<\/h3>

By SCOTUSblog Staff<\/p>

As we noted in yesterday\u2019s newsletter, The SCOTUSblog Summit: 2026 Term Preview, an afternoon of conversations and analysis on the Supreme Court, will be held at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Center in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 16. Registration will open soon.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Contributor Corner<\/span>

How predictable is the Supreme Court from oral argument?<\/h3>

By Adam Feldman<\/p>

In his Empirical SCOTUS column, Adam Feldman analyzed the 56 signed decisions in cases argued during the 2025-26 term, exploring whether certain features of the oral argument in those cases, like the number of words and speaking turns directed to each side, predicted the outcome.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

Justices\u2019 lucrative book deals deserve more scrutiny<\/h3>

By Gabe Roth<\/p>

In a column for SCOTUSblog, Gabe Roth explained why he believes the justices\u2019 practice of publishing and promoting books deserves the type of scrutiny that court-watchers to this point have primarily reserved for gifts and travel.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

Why the Supreme Court decided the wrong issue in the transgender athletes cases<\/h3>

By Craig Konnoth<\/p>

In a column for SCOTUSblog, Craig Konnoth revisited West Virginia v. B.P.J., in which the Supreme Court held that state bans forbidding transgender girls from participating in girls\u2019 sports violated neither Title IX nor the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Konnoth contended that the challengers\u2019 case would have been stronger had they focused on what factors should determine whether someone is a biological female under federal law.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Divided Argument<\/span>

The Based Direction<\/h3>

Will Baude and Dan Epps discussed T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp., in which the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, pronounced dead in the Green Bag two decades ago, proved alive enough to reach state-court judgments still on appeal. They tried to figure out what the doctrine actually is and why the court\u2019s committed formalists split down the middle.<\/p>

Read more Why the Supreme Court decided the wrong issue in the transgender athletes cases<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A Closer Look<\/div>

William Marbury<\/h3><\/div>

In the coming weeks, SCOTUSblog will be running a series of Closer Looks on some of the most well-known Supreme Court plaintiffs. We felt it made sense to start with William Marbury, from the rather minor case of <\/em>Marbury v. Madison.<\/em><\/p>

William Marbury was born in November 1762, likely on a tobacco plantation near Piscataway, Maryland. His grandfather, Francis Marbury, was an English immigrant, who made immense wealth off of property and served as a justice at the county court. Marbury\u2019s father, also named William, inherited one-fifth of his father\u2019s lands, but struggled to make money in the tobacco industry, which was hampered by Britain monopolizing the market and placing large duties on exports.<\/p>

Marbury\u2019s youth was spent moving from place to place as his father chased futile attempts to gain wealth. Perhaps influenced by his father\u2019s failure in that regard, Marbury pursued a career in finance. In 1781, Marbury began working as a clerk to the Maryland auditor general and for much of the rest of the decade as a deputy tax collector.<\/p>

In 1791, Marbury was named the deputy agent for the state of Maryland and then in 1796 the agent for the state, in which he handled financial agreements, collected back taxes, and sold estates. Around this time, he was welcomed into Potomac Federalist circles. In 1798, Marbury became an agent to the Washington Navy Yard, where he would be tasked with overseeing the construction of a naval yard at the Anacostia River.<\/p>

In the waning days of the Adams administration, President John Adams nominated Marbury to serve as a justice of the peace for the District of Columbia. Marbury had actively worked to try and re-elect Adams through the Electoral College during the election of 1800.<\/p>

Despite being confirmed by the Senate and Adams signing his commission, this was never delivered to Marbury. Newly elected President Thomas Jefferson, unwilling to allow more Federalists to take the bench, instructed Secretary of State James Madison not to deliver the commission, prompting Marbury to file suit.<\/p>

In the case of Marbury v. Madison<\/em>, the Supreme Court ruled that Marbury was entitled to his commission and that normally a writ of mandamus (an order to a government official to do his or her duties) would be the appropriate remedy. However, Marbury filed his lawsuit directly at the Supreme Court, and the court held that the relevant provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which purported to give the court original jurisdiction over the case was unconstitutional. As a result, the court lacked the authority to hear it and issue a writ of mandamus. This marked the first time that the Supreme Court declared an act of Congress to be unconstitutional – although it was perhaps not the first time that courts had engaged in .<\/p>

Marbury never sought further legal action regarding his commission, resulting in him never becoming a justice of the peace. Instead, he continued his successful career in finance. He also involved himself in land speculation, purchasing land southeast of Washington D.C., as well as stock in Navy Yard Bridge Company, which had a bridge across the Anacostia River, and the Washington Turnpike, a toll road from Georgetown to Rockville, Maryland.<\/p>

At the time of his passing in 1835, Marbury owned 37 enslaved people. His will stated that his estate would manumit his personal servant, Hamilton, after seven years. However, because the emancipation was delayed, it is unknown whether Hamilton was ever freed.<\/p>

A portrait of Marbury facing a portrait of Madison hangs in the Supreme Court justices\u2019 dining room \u2013 this was installed by Chief Justice Warren Burger in 1979.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE THOMAS: \u201cMr. Phillips, I am still \u2013 I’m just not very good at metaphysics, and \u2013\u201d<\/p>

MR. PHILLIPS: \u201cI’m not very good at physics either.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE THOMAS: \u201cYeah. Well, no, I was good at physics. It’s just metaphysics that were a problem.\u201d<\/p>

Read more Justices\u2019 lucrative book deals deserve more scrutiny<\/a><\/p>

\u2014 (2022)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, how predictable is the Supreme Court from oral argument?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,19,4,47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-contributor-corner","category-divided-argument","category-newsletter","category-scotusblog-events"],"yoast_head":"\nThe ongoing battle over TPS status - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The ongoing battle over TPS status - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, how predictable is the Supreme Court from oral argument?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-28T13:10:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/a5f3462e1291f6a3255629feb6051384.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"The ongoing battle over TPS status\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-28T13:10:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445\"},\"wordCount\":1894,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Contributor Corner\",\"Divided Argument\",\"Newsletter\",\"SCOTUSblog Events\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445\",\"name\":\"The ongoing battle over TPS status - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-28T13:10:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=445#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The ongoing battle over TPS status\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The ongoing battle over TPS status - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The ongoing battle over TPS status - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, how predictable is the Supreme Court from oral argument?","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-07-28T13:10:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/a5f3462e1291f6a3255629feb6051384.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"The ongoing battle over TPS status","datePublished":"2026-07-28T13:10:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445"},"wordCount":1894,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Contributor Corner","Divided Argument","Newsletter","SCOTUSblog Events"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445","name":"The ongoing battle over TPS status - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-28T13:10:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=445#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The ongoing battle over TPS status"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/445","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=445"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/445\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}