{"id":459,"date":"2026-07-30T13:12:14","date_gmt":"2026-07-30T13:12:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459"},"modified":"2026-07-30T13:12:14","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T13:12:14","slug":"trump-indicates-that-he-will-bring-hillary-clinton-case-to-scotus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459","title":{"rendered":"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS"},"content":{"rendered":"

As the Supreme Court awaits word on whether Congress will approve its request for more security funding, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson reflected on what it\u2019s like to be accompanied by security guards 24\/7. Keep reading to learn more about her comments.<\/p>

Read more Trump asks Supreme Court to hear appeal of $83.3 million defamation verdict against him<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

On Monday, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on its emergency docket to clear the way for the full implementation of President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order on mail-in voting. On Tuesday, 12 states \u2013 led by Alabama \u2013 echoed this request in their own application. Responses to these requests from those states challenging the order are due on Monday by 4 p.m. EDT.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Trump Says He Wants Supreme Court to Revive Suit Against Hillary Clinton<\/h3>

Greg Stohr and Erik Larson, Bloomberg<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

President Donald Trump has signaled that \u201che will ask the US Supreme Court to revive his failed lawsuit accusing Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee and others of conspiring to tarnish his 2016 campaign with bogus claims of collusion with Russia,\u201d according to Bloomberg. \u201cIn a Supreme Court made public Tuesday, the president requested an additional month, until Sept. 9, to seek review of a November appeals court decision that upheld dismissal of the case and affirmed almost $1 million in sanctions against Trump and one of his lawyers.\u201d \u201cThe 3-0 ruling by [the] 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals faulted Trump and lawyer Alina Habba for filing a \u2018frivolous\u2019 lawsuit against his 2016 rival. Two of the judges on the panel were appointed by Republican presidents, including one by Trump.\u201d In his recent filing with the Supreme Court, the president \u201cindicated his appeal would focus on the appeals court\u2019s conclusion that he waited too long to sue.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Michelle Obama and Justice Jackson Talk Work-Life Balance and Public Service<\/h3>

Ann E. Marimow, The New York Times<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

During an appearance on former First Lady Michelle Obama\u2019s podcast, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson \u201ccommiserated\u201d with Obama \u201cabout the stresses of co-parenting young children with an equally ambitious spouse, the adjustment to living with round-the-clock security and their experiences as Black college students at elite educational institutions,\u201d according to The New York Times, which noted that the podcast episode was recorded in May. \u201cWhile the two were in agreement about the privilege of serving at the highest levels of public office, both women lamented the adjustment to living in a bubble, accompanied at all times by security.\u201d \u201cI can\u2019t go out in any meaningful way as I used to, and that can be a downside,\u201d Jackson said.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Founders\u2019 views on church-state relations face new scrutiny as Ten Commandments case heads to SCOTUS<\/h3>

Kelsey Reichmann, Courthouse News Service<\/p>

Laws in conservative, southern states, including Texas, that require Ten Commandments displays in public school classrooms \u201cset up a major clash over church-state relations\u201d that\u2019s expected to soon reach the Supreme Court. \u201cA coalition of multifaith Texas families plans to ask the justices to review whether the display of the Christian religion in government-run schools violates the First Amendment,\u201d according to Courthouse News Service. \u201cWhile over four decades of precedent weighs against religious displays in public schools, the appeal comes amid the Supreme Court\u2019s push toward originalism and a growing debate over the founders\u2019 views on the separation of church and state.\u201d Christopher Lund, a professor at Wayne State University, told Courthouse News Service that \u201cthe court is talking about history and tradition in ways that make it seem more sympathetic towards the government taking positions on religion \u2013 maybe even advancing them in the public schools. That\u2019s the big question in the Ten Commandments case.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Ho Suggests Justices Should Reverse Same-Sex Marriage Ruling<\/h3>

Jacqueline Thomsen, Bloomberg Law<\/p>

At a July 17 event hosted by the First Liberty Institute, Judge James Ho of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, considered by many to be a \u201cpotential future Supreme Court pick,\u201d \u201csaid the Supreme Court was wrong to reject President Donald Trump\u2019s bid to end birthright citizenship, and suggested that the high court should overturn its decision legalizing same-sex marriage,\u201d according to Bloomberg Law. \u201cHo said that he finds it \u2018awkward\u2019 to discuss the topic of \u2018judicial courage,\u2019 considering how federal courts have handled what he called \u2018certain self-evident truths.\u2019 \u2018For example: What about the Biblical truth that marriage is the union of one man and one woman?,\u2019\u201d he added. Ho went on to say that the Supreme Court is unlikely to reconsider or reverse its same-sex marriage ruling in the near future, because \u201c[w]e\u2019re nowhere near the four votes necessary to grant a cert petition \u2013 or the five votes needed to rule on the merits.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
Court News<\/span>

Trump asks Supreme Court to hear appeal of $83.3 million defamation verdict against him<\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

Lawyers for President Donald Trump and the federal government on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to take up his appeal of the defamation case brought against him by journalist E. Jean Carroll. A jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million in the case, and a federal appeals court in New York upheld that verdict last year.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

The push to reduce the Supreme Court\u2019s power<\/h3>

By Kelsey Dallas<\/p>

Supreme Court reform is in the spotlight this summer after a contentious term. Here\u2019s a look at proposals focused on Congress reclaiming some of the power to interpret the Constitution that now rests with the courts.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Court News<\/span>

Gorsuch says Americans must study history, \u2018warts, glories, and all\u2019<\/h3>

By Mark Walsh<\/p>

During a virtual appearance on Tuesday at a forum organized by the Ronald Reagan Center on Civility and Democracy, Justice Neil Gorsuch called American democracy \u201cvery fragile,\u201d while observing that young people need to study an unvarnished version of the nation\u2019s history.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Amarica’s Constitution<\/span>

Faces of Intratextualism<\/h3>

Akhil Amar and Andy Lipka continue their study of the Roberts court\u2019s oeuvre of constitutional cases, with particular emphasis on the series of cases that concerned making rules for voting and voting districts.<\/p>

Read more The push to reduce the Supreme Court\u2019s power<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A Closer Look<\/div>

Reel v. North Carolina<\/h3><\/div>

Approximately six years ago, three officers with the High Point Police Department in High Point, North Carolina, drove to the home of Quashaun Melsun Reel. They were following up on two complaints made to their chief\u2019s office and Crime Stoppers about drug sales taking place at the address, and they planned to conduct a \u201cknock and talk,\u201d walking up to Reel\u2019s door and then speaking with him about the complaints.<\/p>

According to , after parking, Officer Brian Hilliard, a member of the police department\u2019s street crimes unit, first approached and tried to speak to a woman who had parked outside Reel\u2019s home and was walking towards his residence. When she did not respond, he followed her to the door of the home, which Reel briefly opened to let the woman inside and then \u201cslammed [it] shut.\u201d While the door was opened, \u201cHilliard detected the strong odor of marijuana,\u201d which he determined gave him probable cause to enter without a warrant. He also believed Reel and the woman would rush to destroy evidence \u201cif he did not immediately gain entry.\u201d<\/p>

The officers then \u201cbegan to give commands for the door to be opened,\u201d followed by an attempt to \u201cshoulder\u201d it open while Reel \u201cattempt[ed] to push the door closed.\u201d Following this, one of the officers with Hilliard kicked in Reel\u2019s door. Inside, they found \u201c[a] bag of marijuana, a bag of pills and a digital scale … in plain view,\u201d according to the trial court. Reel was ultimately charged with several crimes, including possession with intent to sell or deliver schedule I and schedule VI controlled substances. In the trial court, Reel\u2019s legal team filed a motion to suppress the evidence, contending that the officers had violated the Fourth Amendment, which outlaws \u201cunreasonable searches and seizures.\u201d Specifically, they argued that Hilliard needed a warrant before he walked up to Reel\u2019s door, because the purpose of the so-called \u201cwalk and talk\u201d was to gather evidence about Reel\u2019s activities, not to simply have a brief chat.<\/p>

North Carolina Superior Court Judge William A. Wood Reel\u2019s motion, concluding that \u201cOfficer Hilliard\u2019s approach to the front entrance of\u201d Reel\u2019s home \u201cwas legal in every way,\u201d and that Hilliard and the other officers \u201chad both probable cause and exigent circumstances to force entry.\u201d Reel reached a plea agreement with the state under which he pled guilty to five of the charges, but he preserved his right to appeal the judge\u2019s denial of his motion to suppress.<\/p>

After sentencing, Reel appealed the denial to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, which affirmed Wood\u2019s decision by a 2-1 vote. The judges in the majority acknowledged that the Supreme Court held in 2013\u2019s Florida v. Jardines<\/em> that the officers in that case had violated the Fourth Amendment when they brought a drug-detecting dog to a front porch without a warrant, but said that \u201cknock and talk\u201d visits remain \u201cconstitutionally permissible\u201d because they involve police officers doing what any member of the public may do: \u201capproach the home by the front path, knock promptly, wait briefly to be received, and then (absent invitation to linger longer) leave.\u201d Reel appealed again, but the Supreme Court of North Carolina also affirmed the trial court\u2019s denial of his motion to suppress.<\/p>

In March, Reel filed his with the Supreme Court, urging the justices to address the lower courts\u2019 \u201cstruggle[] to properly apply Jardines.<\/em>\u201d In that 2013 case, Reel explained, the court recognized that police officers have a right to approach the curtilage of a home \u2013 that is, the area immediately surrounding it and associated with it, like a front porch \u2013 in order to speak with the resident, like any member of the public might do. However, it also held that officers need a warrant for such a visit when the purpose is to gather information and potentially collect evidence. Many \u201cwalk and talk\u201d investigations stem from the goal of \u201cgathering incriminating evidence,\u201d according to Reel, but lower courts are failing to distinguish them from permissible police visits. Such courts, Reel wrote, \u201care very confused how they analyze implied license to enter a home\u2019s curtilage, knock and talk investigations, and law enforcement purpose.\u201d<\/p>

Initially, North Carolina waived its right to respond to Reel\u2019s petition for review, but the justices requested a response in April. In that , which was filed in June, the state contends that there actually is no \u201cdoctrinal confusion among lower appellate courts\u201d on the question of how to assess an officer\u2019s purpose for conducting a \u201cwalk and talk\u201d in order to determine whether the officer was behaving like any other visitor or if, instead, the officer was conducting a search of the area. \u201cThe alleged division and confusion is illusory,\u201d according to the brief. \u201cOf the nine courts cited by [Reel], four explicitly discuss officer purpose. As for the other five, the cases cited do not reveal any doctrinal division or confusion as to an officer\u2019s purpose.\u201d<\/p>

Reel v. North Carolina<\/em> is scheduled to be considered by the justices at their \u201clong conference\u201d on Sept. 28.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

\u201cThe perpetuity of our institutions, and the liberty which is enjoyed under them, depend in no small degree upon the power given the judiciary to declare null and void all legislation that is clearly repugnant to the supreme law of the land.\u201d<\/p>

Read more Gorsuch says Americans must study history, \u2018warts, glories, and all\u2019<\/a><\/p>

\u2014 Justice John Marshall Harlan in Smyth v. Ames<\/em>\u00a0(1898)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, more on the petitions for review addressing an $83.3 million defamation verdict against the president.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-amaricas-constitution","category-from-the-scotusblog-team","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nTrump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, more on the petitions for review addressing an $83.3 million defamation verdict against the president.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-30T13:12:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/e15449bb35df669197cc397eff3e9254.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1278\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-30T13:12:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459\"},\"wordCount\":1954,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Amarica's Constitution\",\"From the SCOTUSblog Team\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459\",\"name\":\"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-30T13:12:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=459#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, more on the petitions for review addressing an $83.3 million defamation verdict against the president.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-07-30T13:12:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1278,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/e15449bb35df669197cc397eff3e9254.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS","datePublished":"2026-07-30T13:12:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459"},"wordCount":1954,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Amarica's Constitution","From the SCOTUSblog Team","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459","name":"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-30T13:12:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=459#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trump indicates that he will bring Hillary Clinton case to SCOTUS"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/459\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}