{"id":465,"date":"2026-07-31T13:12:37","date_gmt":"2026-07-31T13:12:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465"},"modified":"2026-07-31T13:12:37","modified_gmt":"2026-07-31T13:12:37","slug":"palestinian-authorities-seek-supreme-court-relief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465","title":{"rendered":"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief"},"content":{"rendered":"

Justice Anthony Kennedy\u2019s retirement from the Supreme Court took effect on this day in 2018, just over a month after he announced it.<\/p>

Read more Completing the picture of the court\u2019s criminal law term<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

The Trump administration on Monday asked the Supreme Court on its emergency docket to clear the way for the full implementation of President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order on mail-in voting. On Tuesday, 12 states \u2013 led by Alabama \u2013 echoed this request in their own application. Responses to these requests from those states challenging the order are due on Monday by 4 p.m. EDT.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The Supreme Court has indicated on its website that its courtroom will be closed from Monday, Aug. 3, until Monday, Aug. 31. No courtroom lectures will take place during that period.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Palestinian authorities ask Supreme Court to halt $656M judgment pending appeal<\/h3>

The Associated Press<\/p>

Palestinian authorities came to the Supreme Court on its emergency docket and asked the justices \u201cto halt for now a $656 million judgment in a long-running lawsuit filed by Americans killed or wounded in attacks in Israel,\u201d as they prepare a petition for review, according to The Associated Press. \u201cThe Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority said in that paying the hefty judgment now would \u2018destabilize critical government services Petitioners provide in the West Bank, injure innocent citizens, and jeopardize regional security.\u2019\u201d \u201cThe emergency appeal comes after a lower court reinstated the damages in the wake of a Supreme Court decision\u201d in June 2025 holding that the lawsuit against Palestinian authorities, which was brought \u201cunder the Anti-Terrorism Act, a law aimed at opening U.S. courts to victims of international terror attacks,\u201d could move forward.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Favorable views of Supreme Court remain near historic low<\/h3>

Ted Van Green, Pew Research Center<\/p>

Following Gallup\u2019s release of survey data showing that Supreme Court job approval is at a record low, Pew Research Center shared its own data on Americans\u2019 views of the court, showing that \u201c[j]ust over half of Americans (53%) currently have an unfavorable opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court, while a smaller share (45%) views the court favorably.\u201d Pew noted that \u201c[t]he court\u2019s favorable rating is 20 percentage points lower today than in April 2021, when 65% of Americans held a positive view.\u201d The survey also showed that \u201c[m]ore than half of Americans (56%) say the Supreme Court has the right amount of power, while 32% say it has too much power. One-in-ten say the court has too little power.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Confusion escalates about whether TPS has actually ended for Haitians<\/h3>

Lauren Kaori Gurley, The Washington Post<\/p>

In a June 25 ruling, the Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to end removal protections for Haitian nationals. But more than a month later, it is unclear whether temporary protected status has yet been revoked. The Department of Homeland Security \u201chas indicated online that the humanitarian program for Haitians was \u2018terminated, effective July 27, 2026,\u2019 this Monday. But lawyers say that TPS cannot officially end until lower courts execute [the] Supreme Court ruling and officially allow the Trump administration to terminate the program,\u201d according to The Washington Post. Amid the uncertainty, \u201c[s]ome employers have terminated workers and subsequently rehired them. Others have preemptively removed workers from schedules without pay or have fired workers in fear of becoming targets of immigration enforcement.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Two more federal appeals courts reject ICE mass detention policy<\/h3>

Kyle Cheney, Politico<\/p>

On Thursday, panels of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the and U.S. Court of Appeals for the \u201cshot down the Trump administration\u2019s bid to subject millions of immigrants \u2013 most of whom have lived in the U.S. for years without criminal records \u2013 to mandatory detention without bond,\u201d becoming the fifth and sixth federal appeals courts to do so, according to Politico. Both panels, by a vote of 2-1, \u201cfound that the Trump administration had \u2026 misconstrued decades-old immigration laws to justify its expansive detention policy.\u201d The 11th, 2nd, 10th, and 6th Circuits have issued similar decisions in recent months, while \u201cthe 5th Circuit and the 8th Circuit … have sided with the Trump administration. Rulings are pending in three other circuits.\u201d Politico noted that \u201c[t]he issue appears destined for Supreme Court consideration.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
Contributor Corner<\/span>

Completing the picture of the court\u2019s criminal law term<\/h3>

By Rory Little<\/p>

In his SCOTUSCrim column, Rory Little reviewed 19 cases argued and decided during the 2025-26 term that, while not pure criminal law cases, are broadly related to criminal law topics, emphasizing that \u201ca whopping 60%\u201d of the court\u2019s merits docket work was tied to criminal law. And Little noted that, \u201c[w]hether due to careful case selection or other factors, the fact is that the justices found more agreement than disagreement in the criminal law cases they decided to hear.\u201d<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

Justice Kavanaugh: the great concurrer of the Roberts court?<\/h3>

By Rodger Citron<\/p>

Justice William Brennan was \u201cthe playmaker.\u201d Justice John Marshall Harlan was \u201cThe Great Dissenter.\u201d Is Justice Brett Kavanaugh the great concurrer? In a column for SCOTUSblog, Rodger Citron highlighted some of Kavanaugh\u2019s most notable concurring opinions and explored what they tell us about the justice and the court itself.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

How a seemingly unexciting case on retirement plans could have massive consequences<\/h3>

By Cory L. Andrews<\/p>

In a column for SCOTUSblog, Cory L. Andrews analyzed Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, a case that will be argued during the 2026-27 term on what a lawsuit over retirement fund underperformance must allege to survive its first test in court. Andrews believes \u201cthe stakes could hardly be more far-reaching.\u201d<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Advisory Opinions<\/span>

Receipts on the Senate Filibuster | Interview: Mike \u201cFrags\u201d Fragoso<\/h3>

Sarah Isgur and David French discuss the Trump administration\u2019s appeal to the Supreme Court about its mail-in voting executive order. Then, they speak with Mike Fragoso, former chief counsel to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and partner at Torridon Law, about the food truck nature of Senate judicial nomination.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A Closer Look<\/div>

Justice Thomas Johnson<\/h3><\/div>

Justice Thomas Johnson has the distinction of holding the third-shortest tenure of any associate justice in Supreme Court history. But although his time as a justice was fleeting, the career that preceded (and followed) it was remarkable.<\/p>

Read more How a seemingly unexciting case on retirement plans could have massive consequences<\/a><\/p>

Johnson was born in November 1732 in Calvert County, Maryland, the fifth of a planter\u2019s 12 children. Schooled at home, he found work in Annapolis at the Land Office, and then read law in the office of Stephen Bordley, getting admitted to the bar in 1760 at what one account called \u201cthe relatively advanced age of twenty-seven.\u201d In 1766, Johnson married Anne Jennings, his former boss\u2019 daughter. He also came to operate a network of furnaces and mills in western Maryland with three of his brothers.<\/p>

Johnson\u2019s political rise began with a seat in Maryland\u2019s Lower House in 1762. As the split with England deepened, he joined both the committee of correspondence and the council of safety. He then represented Maryland at the First and Second Continental Congresses, where, on June 15, 1775, he put George Washington\u2019s name in the running for commander-in-chief. (The two were close friends; some of Washington\u2019s letters to Johnson are stored in a Maryland public library.)<\/p>

Johnson returned to Maryland shortly after to help recruit soldiers for the state, and in doing so missed the signing of the Declaration of Independence. When Washington asked for military reinforcements while retreating across New Jersey, Johnson organized 1,800 militiamen and led them to Washington. Arriving in January 1777 covered in mud, a guard tried to turn him away. Per one historian: \u201cSplattered with mud from the march, and diminutive of stature, Johnson looked anything but a brigadier general of militia. … [T]he [guard] reported to General Washington that there was a filthy red-headed little man who demanded to see him and that the general\u2019s orders could be damned but he intended to see him. The Commander-in-Chief exclaimed, \u2018Oh! It is Johnson of Maryland! Admit him at once!\u2019\u201d<\/p>

Weeks later, the Maryland Legislature elected Johnson to be the state\u2019s first governor, unanimously returning him to office twice, the maximum consecutive terms allowed by the state\u2019s constitution. Having helped draft Maryland\u2019s constitution in 1776, Johnson later sat in the House of Delegates and the 1788 ratification convention, then turned down Washington\u2019s 1789 offer to be Maryland\u2019s first federal district judge. Instead, Johnson became chief judge of the General Court of Maryland in 1790.<\/p>

In August 1791, Washington named Johnson to the Supreme Court. His confirmation followed in November \u2013 making Johnson the first Supreme Court justice ever appointed during a Senate recess. Johnson had initially hesitated, fearing circuit duty, but accepted the position after reassurances from both Washington and Chief Justice John Jay. Nevertheless, he was handed the Southern Circuit (arguably the most arduous of them), having been \u2013 in one historian\u2019s judgment \u2013 \u201coutmaneuvered by Jay and the other Justices with greater seniority.\u201d Johnson would not have it, and he resigned in January 1793.<\/p>

During his short time on the court, Johnson participated in Hayburn\u2019s Case<\/em>, in which he took the position that the attorney general could require a federal court to hear a petition without the president\u2019s specific permission. This view did not prevail given that the court split evenly. Perhaps more notably, Johnson authored the court\u2019s decision (his only written opinion) in Georgia v. Brailsford<\/em>, which \u201cimplicate[d] states\u2019 rights, international treaties, fair credit, and the reputation of the still-new Supreme Court.\u201d<\/p>

After leaving the court, Johnson declined to be nominated as Secretary of State in 1795. On Feb. 22, 1800, Johnson delivered a eulogy for Washington. Continuing his pattern of declinations, he turned down the role of chief judge of the new capital\u2019s territory in 1801 \u2013 though he did serve as a commissioner of the new capital in D.C. before and during his court term, helping to settle details such as where the capital would be located and what it would be called.<\/p>

Johnson died on Oct. 26, 1819, at \u201cRose Hill\u201d near Frederick, Maryland. In 1913 his remains were moved to Mount Olivet Cemetery, where a monument now honors him.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

MR. ELWOOD: \u201cThe way I understood your position is he has to know that a reasonable person \u2013\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE BREYER: \u201cYes, he does. Just as if you go into a bank, you have to know certain elements for it to be bank robbery. You have to know that you have a threat, you have to know \u2013 et cetera. Now, here one of the elements of the crime is to communicate, in commerce, a true threat. So you have to know. Communicate, in commerce, a true threat.\u201d<\/p>

MR. ELWOOD: \u201cWell, the thing is, though \u2013\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE BREYER: \u201cI wouldn\u2019t have asked it if I didn\u2019t want your view, so what is your view?\u201d<\/p>

Read more Justice Kavanaugh: the great concurrer of the Roberts court?<\/a><\/p>

MR. ELWOOD: \u201cI\u2019m trying hard to give it to you.\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 \u00a0(2014)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, is Justice Kavanaugh the great concurrer of the Roberts court?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,22,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advisory-opinions","category-contributor-corner","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nPalestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, is Justice Kavanaugh the great concurrer of the Roberts court?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-31T13:12:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/ca62f1a7d3ebc2f276a0de98a53cd0aa.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-31T13:12:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465\"},\"wordCount\":1829,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Advisory Opinions\",\"Contributor Corner\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465\",\"name\":\"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-31T13:12:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=465#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, is Justice Kavanaugh the great concurrer of the Roberts court?","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-07-31T13:12:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1400,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/ca62f1a7d3ebc2f276a0de98a53cd0aa.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief","datePublished":"2026-07-31T13:12:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465"},"wordCount":1829,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Advisory Opinions","Contributor Corner","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465","name":"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-31T13:12:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=465#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Palestinian authorities seek Supreme Court relief"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=465"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/465\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}