{"id":539,"date":"2026-08-19T13:10:52","date_gmt":"2026-08-19T13:10:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539"},"modified":"2026-08-19T13:10:52","modified_gmt":"2026-08-19T13:10:52","slug":"trump-administration-awaits-emergency-docket-decisions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539","title":{"rendered":"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions"},"content":{"rendered":"

Forty-five years ago, President Ronald Reagan formally nominated Sandra Day O\u2019Connor to the Supreme Court, fulfilling his campaign promise to appoint a woman. In a February closer look, we covered women on the Supreme Court shortlist in the years before O\u2019Connor\u2019s nomination.<\/p>

Read more Supreme Court urged to leave in place order blocking construction of White House ballroom<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

On Friday, the Trump administration urged the Supreme Court to pause a lower-court ruling that would halt construction of a new White House ballroom. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, the private nonprofit challenging the construction project, to this request on Tuesday, asking the court to leave the ruling in place. Find Amy\u2019s coverage of the filing in the On Site section below.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Also on Tuesday, the court a request for a stay of execution from William Frances Silvia, who was sentenced to death for the murder of his estranged wife, Patricia Silvia, and attempted murder of her mother, Betty Woodard. Hours later, Silvia was executed in Florida.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

On July 27, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on its emergency docket to clear the way for the implementation of President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order on mail-in voting. Twelve states later echoed this request in their own application. One week later, the group of 23 states and the District of Columbia challenging the order the court to deny these requests. Last Wednesday, the Trump administration the court to \u201cpromptly\u201d issue its decision.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

US judge allows Trump to end thousands of Ethiopians’ deportation protections<\/h3>

Nate Raymond, Reuters<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

With its June 25 ruling in Mullin v. Doe<\/em>, the Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to end deportation protections for Haitian and Syrian nationals under the Temporary Protected Status program. The decision had ripple effects for several other TPS lawsuits, including a challenge to the administration\u2019s effort to end legal protections for around 5,000 Ethiopian nationals. On Tuesday, the judge in the Ethiopia case, U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, lifted his order protecting such individuals, which had been the last remaining \u201cjudicial block on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security terminating the Temporary Protected Status designation for individual countries,\u201d according to Reuters. \u201cJames Percival, DHS\u2019 general counsel, hailed the decision in a social media post. \u2018All TPS terminations are in effect!\u2019 he wrote.\u201d Reuters noted that, although the Ethiopian nationals involved in the dispute before Murphy are now at risk for deportation, his order allows them \u201cto continue to litigate over whether DHS\u2019s action was motivated by racial or national origin animus in violation of the U.S. Constitution\u2019s Fifth Amendment.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

DOJ asks court to reinstate Abrego Garcia charges<\/h3>

Sarah Davis, The Hill<\/p>

On Monday, the Justice Department the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit to reinstate human smuggling \u201ccharges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, following a lower court order earlier this year that found the Salvadoran man was the subject of a likely vindictive prosecution,\u201d according to The Hill. In his order, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw had concluded that DOJ officials abused their \u201cprosecuting power\u201d by bringing the human smuggling charges, which are \u201cconnected to a 2022 traffic stop,\u201d against Abrego Garcia after mistakenly deporting him to El Salvador last year. Abrego Garcia \u201creentered the U.S. in June 2025 after the Supreme Court said the White House must \u2018facilitate\u2019 his return.\u201d In their Monday filing at the 6th Circuit, federal prosecutors contended that \u201c[t]he government had an obvious interest in protecting the public by prosecuting Abrego after courts ordered his return.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

How the Supreme Court Kicked Off America\u2019s Sports Betting Addiction Crisis<\/h3>

Madiba K. Dennie, Talking Points Memo<\/p>

In a column for Talking Points Memo, Madiba K. Dennie argued that the Supreme Court\u2019s 2018 ruling striking down a law \u201cthat prohibited sports gambling throughout much of the country\u201d led to the current sports gambling crisis. \u201cBefore the Court\u2019s decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association<\/em>, only four states authorized some form of sports betting. One year after Murphy<\/em>, 19 states and the District of Columbia authorized sports betting. Today, 39 states and Washington, D.C., have laws authorizing sports betting. Most allow people to place mobile bets, which means that millions of Americans now carry an addictive bankrupting device in their pockets,\u201d Dennie wrote.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

How the Supreme Court could use Trump\u2019s ballroom to gut environmental law<\/h3>

Ian Millhiser, Vox<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

In a column for Vox on the White House ballroom dispute on the Supreme Court\u2019s emergency docket, Ian Millhiser contended that the court\u2019s determination as to whether the National Trust for Historic Preservation has standing to challenge the construction project \u201ccould have major ramifications for a wide range of laws that seek to conserve environmental resources or preserve sacred or historical sites\u201d if it throws into question past rulings in which the court \u201cheld that plaintiffs who wish to observe something beautiful may often sue to enforce environmental statutes that seek to preserve that beauty.\u201d \u201cThe stakes in [the case], in other words, are far greater than whether Trump can replace the East Wing with an eyesore,\u201d Millhiser wrote. A win for Trump \u201ccould fundamentally wound America\u2019s environmental protection regime.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
Court News<\/span>

Supreme Court urged to leave in place order blocking construction of White House ballroom<\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

Lawyers for the National Trust for Historic Preservation urged the Supreme Court on Tuesday afternoon to leave in place a ruling by a federal court in Washington, D.C., that would temporarily block construction of a new White House ballroom. Gregory Craig, who served as the White House counsel during the Obama administration, accused the Trump administration of \u201ctrying to outrun judicial review\u201d by expediting construction on the ballroom so that \u201cit will soon be \u2018virtually impossible to deconstruct.\u2019\u201d<\/p>

Read more The chief justice should share much of his power<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

What if one vote had changed in the birthright citizenship case?<\/h3>

By Joshua R. Averbach & Roy T. Englert, Jr.<\/p>

In a column for SCOTUSblog, Joshua R. Averbach and Roy T. Englert, Jr. explored what would have happened if one more justice had dissented in the birthright citizenship case, creating a 4-1-4 split. Under Supreme Court precedent, when the court \u201cfails to produce a majority opinion, \u2018the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds,\u2019\u201d but lower courts and commentators disagree on how to apply this precedent.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

The chief justice should share much of his power<\/h3>

By Josh Blackman<\/p>

For his series on what the Supreme Court can do better, Josh Blackman wrote about why he believes the chief justice should delegate his duty to preside over oral argument and the justices\u2019 private conferences. \u201cThis reform would allow junior members to have a greater impact on the court and its practices,\u201d Blackman wrote, and prevent the chief, \u201cwho is assigned zero powers at the court by the Constitution,\u201d from \u201cexercising sweeping powers for life.\u201d<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Advisory Opinions<\/span>

Trump\u2019s Ballroom Blitz<\/h3>

Sarah Isgur and David French discuss President Donald Trump\u2019s appeal to the Supreme Court on the construction of a White House ballroom, a religious liberty case about permits and prayer services, and a bit of reality TV litigation.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Ask Amy<\/h3><\/div>

Q: How do Supreme Court reporters coordinate or compete during “major” releases?<\/strong><\/p>

A: To be honest, there’s not a lot in the way of “competition” during “major” releases of opinions or orders. The Supreme Court is in many ways notoriously opaque, but it issues all of its opinions and orders to everyone at the same time \u2013 usually, both in person, by handing them out at the court\u2019s Public Information Office, and online. (Major leaks are a different issue, and we are impressed by, but have a friendly envy of, our colleagues who land big scoops.)<\/p>

Supreme\u00a0Court reporters do sometimes coordinate informally when the court releases order lists, which (depending on the time of year) can be quite long. When we’re in the press room with paper copies of the lists in our hands, someone may shout “no grants” to confirm quickly that the court has not added any cases to its merits docket. Or if there is a particular case that we’re all following, someone may flag where the court has acted on it (or if it didn’t do so).<\/p>

The Public Information Office’s\u00a0distribution of orders and opinions can be chaotic on “big” days, but it’s also collegial. By tradition, reporters for “the wires” \u2013 Reuters, the Associated Press, and Bloomberg \u2013 get the spots closest to the desk from which orders or opinions will be handed out, so that they can dash quickly back to their cubicles. After that, it’s a free for all, but even then, reporters near the desk will often hand a copy back to colleagues who are further away.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

GENERAL VERRILLI: \u201c\u2026 And I will say, I do think, as the number of minority enrollees gets higher, the burden on the university to do that is going to get harder to meet. But I don’t think \u2013 I don’t think there is a number, and I don’t think it would be prudent for this Court to suggest that there is a number, because it would raise exactly the kind of problem that I \u2013 that I think Justice Kennedy identified in the Grutter<\/em> dissent of creating hydraulic pressure towards that number.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cWe should probably stop calling it critical mass then, because mass, you know, assumes numbers, either in size or a certain weight.\u201d<\/p>

Read more What if one vote had changed in the birthright citizenship case?<\/a><\/p>

GENERAL VERRILLI: \u201cI agree.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cSo we should stop calling it mass.\u201d<\/p>

GENERAL VERRILLI: \u201cI agree.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cCall it a cloud or something like that.\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 (2012)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, an update on the ripple effects of the Supreme Court\u2019s TPS ruling.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advisory-opinions","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nTrump administration awaits emergency docket decisions - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, an update on the ripple effects of the Supreme Court\u2019s TPS ruling.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-19T13:10:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2fc34d686f535d1f0b8b69e2ad189dbb.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-19T13:10:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539\"},\"wordCount\":1659,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Advisory Opinions\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539\",\"name\":\"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-19T13:10:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=539#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, an update on the ripple effects of the Supreme Court\u2019s TPS ruling.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-08-19T13:10:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2fc34d686f535d1f0b8b69e2ad189dbb.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions","datePublished":"2026-08-19T13:10:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539"},"wordCount":1659,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Advisory Opinions","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539","name":"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-08-19T13:10:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=539#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trump administration awaits emergency docket decisions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=539"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/539\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}