{"id":67,"date":"2026-05-26T13:14:25","date_gmt":"2026-05-26T13:14:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67"},"modified":"2026-05-26T13:14:25","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T13:14:25","slug":"unending-oral-arguments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67","title":{"rendered":"Unending oral arguments"},"content":{"rendered":"

On this day in 2009, then-President Barack Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.<\/p>

Read more The Supreme Court and social media<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

On Thursday, the justices met in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from that conference are expected this morning at 9:30 a.m. EDT.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The court has indicated that it may announce opinions on Thursday at 10 a.m. EDT. We will be live blogging that morning beginning at 9:30.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Oral arguments are taking forever. Supreme Court justices have had enough<\/h3>

John Fritze, CNN<\/p>

Oral argument sessions at the Supreme Court are getting longer, and it\u2019s prompting a debate about whether something needs to change. \u201cThe average length of arguments in the current term clocked in at just under 90 minutes, according to a CNN analysis. That\u2019s up nearly 10 minutes from the term that began in 2020, when the court heard arguments remotely because of the pandemic.\u201d Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito recently have shared their interest in finding a way to shorten arguments, while Justice Clarence Thomas has joked that he could sit in the courtroom \u201call day.\u201d Emory University law professor Tonja Jacobi told CNN that part of the value of argument sessions is that they help regular people better understand the court\u2019s work but noted that longer arguments \u201cbecome a little less accessible.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Supreme Court\u2019s John Roberts Faces Impeachment Resolution from Democrat<\/h3>

Jason Lemon, Newsweek<\/p>

On Thursday, Rep. Steve Cohen, a Democrat from Tennessee, introduced a \u201clong-shot effort\u201d to impeach Chief Justice John Roberts \u201ccentered on allegations that the Supreme Court under his leadership has acted in a partisan and inconsistent manner,\u201d according to Newsweek. \u201cIn a statement announcing the resolution, Cohen said that Roberts has led the court to be \u2018understood as biased: with decisions designed to benefit Republicans at the expense of representative government, seemingly contradictory and unexplained orders, and a pattern of ethical breaches that raises questions about the role of the wealthy.\u2019\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

US Companies Shamed by Trump Tiptoe Into Tariff-Refund Race<\/h3>

Laura Curtis, Rachel Phua, and Ignacio Gonzalez, Bloomberg<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

According to a Bloomberg analysis, \u201c[o]nly about 5% of the 3,000 largest publicly traded US companies mentioned refunds in the context of President Donald Trump\u2019s now-illegal tariffs in recent comments and regulatory filings.\u201d Bloomberg noted that such companies are staying quiet about tariff refunds in hopes of reducing \u201cthe risk of political and legal jeopardy\u201d that comes with claiming them. That risk became clear when President Donald Trump \u201cpaint[ed] refund backers as unpatriotic after the Supreme Court struck down\u201d his signature tariffs. \u201cSaying too much about refunds invites not just Trump\u2019s scorn but also legal challenges from consumers clamoring for a piece of the payout.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Mahmoud Khalil to Appeal to Supreme Court in Effort to Halt Deportation<\/h3>

Jonah E. Bromwich, The New York Times<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

On Friday, the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit declined to review the case of Mahmoud Khalil, \u201ca Columbia University graduate who was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents last March and quickly became the face of President Trump\u2019s crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus demonstrators.\u201d Khalil, \u201ca legal permanent resident who is married to an American,\u201d had asked the full 3rd Circuit to revisit a panel\u2019s decision allowing his case to proceed in immigration court without a federal district court first weighing in on the constitutional issues involved, according to The New York Times. \u201cMr. Khalil\u2019s lawyers have already asked the Third Circuit to halt the impact of its Friday decision while they appeal to the Supreme Court on those jurisdictional issues.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Lawyers challenge Roundup cancer settlement as Supreme Court ruling nears<\/h3>

Maureen Groppe, USA Today<\/p>

As Monsanto awaits a Supreme Court ruling that may bar users of its Roundup weedkiller from suing it for not including a cancer warning on Roundup\u2019s product label, the company is pursuing a separate effort to resolve such lawsuits: a $7.25 billion class-action settlement. Initially, that settlement was on track to be finalized this summer, around the time the justices issue their ruling, but now the lawyers behind the Supreme Court case \u201care trying to derail\u201d it by seeking to move the settlement proposal from state to federal court and by contending that it \u201cwon\u2019t adequately compensate people who believe they\u2019ve been sickened by Roundup,\u201d according to USA Today. Bayer, which acquired Monsanto in 2018, \u201chopes that both the Supreme Court and the pending settlement will limit the extent of future lawsuits.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

A history of Supreme Court leaks <\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

Last month, The New York Times published a major scoop: the inside story of the Supreme Court\u2019s 2016 order blocking then-President Barack Obama\u2019s Clean Power Plan on its interim docket. The story was made possible by a leak of internal memos. How common are such leaks in the court\u2019s history?<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Opinion Analysis<\/span>

Justices agree that actuaries can use up-to-date assumptions in assessing costs of leaving a multi-employer pension plan<\/h3>

By Ronald Mann<\/p>

Thursday\u2019s decision in M&K Employee Solutions v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund was pretty much exactly what you would have expected given the argument: a brisk rejection of the idea that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 obligates actuaries to use out-of-date assumptions when they work on pension plans.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

The Supreme Court and social media<\/h3>

By Cortez Collins<\/p>

The Supreme Court shapes constitutional and statutory meaning in an era defined by rapid technological change. But, despite presiding over disputes that involve online conduct, the court itself is strikingly absent from that world. This absence is especially notable in social media. Can \u2013 or should \u2013 the court continue to remain so disconnected?<\/p>

Read more Racial considerations in voting rights and immigration policy on the last day of oral argument<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Divided Argument<\/span>

Ninja Court Packing<\/h3>

Will Baude and Dan Epps are joined by Professor Pam Karlan for a live show at the American Law Institute Annual Meeting to work through a busy stretch of the interim docket and looming merits decisions on executive power. They then answer audience questions on state voting rights acts, fixing the single-member-district statute, and whether you can wish yourself more wishes.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

A Closer Look<\/div>

Bench vs. Slip Opinions<\/h3><\/div>

It\u2019s time to delve into our favorite thing \u2013 SCOTUS minutiae. As SCOTUSblog readers know, we host a live blog on opinion days. Almost immediately after an opinion is announced, it becomes available on the court\u2019s website, and a member of the SCOTUSblog team will then post a link to it on the live blog. This is labeled a \u201cslip opinion.\u201d However, as we\u2019ve explained, Amy is typically in the court\u2019s press room when opinions come down, and she (along with the other reporters present) receives paper copies of the opinions from the court\u2019s staff. The paper copy that Amy receives (which is also available to members of the public about 30 minutes after opinion announcements) is labeled a \u201cbench opinion.\u201d<\/p>

But what in the world is the difference between a \u201cbench\u201d and a \u201cslip\u201d opinion? Why the heck aren\u2019t they just called … opinions?<\/p>

Let\u2019s start with bench opinions. This practice emerged when the court moved into its current home in 1935 and adopted a \u201c\u201d approach to issuing decisions. Specifically, several members of the press sat at desks between the justices sitting on the bench and the counsel\u2019s podium. When a justice announced a decision, members of the court\u2019s staff would hand paper copies to these journalists. The journalists would then send the copies of the opinion down a floor to their coworkers in the press room through (picture the tubes used at a bank drive-up window \u2013 or in the movie Brazil). From there, the reporters would write their stories about the case (or cases) as quickly as possible for publication. Although the pneumatic tubes and reporters\u2019 desks in the courtroom are gone (Chief Justice Warren Burger had them \u2013 and the reporters \u2013 removed in 1971 when he had a curved bench installed), the term bench opinion remains.<\/p>

So what is a slip opinion? Slip opinions were originally opinions printed on loose \u201cslips\u201d of paper that could be inserted into printed volumes of cases. The slip opinion typically came out later then the bench opinion and might have corrections or edits that did not appear in the bench opinion \u2013 although now that a version of the slip opinion is posted online they are generally identical. That said, the online slip opinion may be updated from time to time for any errors as the publication process is completed, which occurs when these are placed into the volumes of the United States Reports. Slip opinions are also available in the Public Information Office (at least those from the ).<\/p>

But what, today, is the substantive difference between a bench and slip opinion? The answer is not much. While historically there was some delay between the bench opinion being distributed and the release of slip opinions a few days later, technology has shortened that delay to become almost nonexistent. So then why keep that particular distinction at all? Because, above all else, as the court\u2019s website states, the Supreme Court \u201cis deeply tied to its traditions.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE KENNEDY: \u201cAnd that if there was fraud on the market, that is a materiality question addressed at the certification stage, but if the class isn’t certified, the investor can still show that he had had direct reliance that was reasonable?\u201d<\/p>

MR. WAXMAN: \u201cYes.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE KENNEDY: \u201cAm I \u2013 am I right about that? Or \u2013\u201d<\/p>

MR. WAXMAN: \u201cYou are \u2013 you are either right or wrong, depending on how I understood you. Let me \u2013\u201d<\/p>

(Laughter.)<\/p>

MR. WAXMAN: \u201cLet me start with you’re right, Justice Kennedy, you’re absolutely right.\u201d<\/p>

Read more A brief guide to each chief justice of the United States<\/a><\/p>

JUSTICE KENNEDY: \u201cDo the first part.\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 \u00a0(2012)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, a history of Supreme Court leaks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,5,4,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-divided-argument","category-from-the-scotusblog-team","category-newsletter","category-opinion-analysis"],"yoast_head":"\nUnending oral arguments - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Unending oral arguments - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, a history of Supreme Court leaks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-26T13:14:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/8062c33cdb729495801c084e0a9a2619.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"Unending oral arguments\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-26T13:14:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67\"},\"wordCount\":1663,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Divided Argument\",\"From the SCOTUSblog Team\",\"Newsletter\",\"Opinion Analysis\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67\",\"name\":\"Unending oral arguments - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-26T13:14:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=67#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Unending oral arguments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Unending oral arguments - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Unending oral arguments - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, a history of Supreme Court leaks.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-05-26T13:14:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/8062c33cdb729495801c084e0a9a2619.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"Unending oral arguments","datePublished":"2026-05-26T13:14:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67"},"wordCount":1663,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Divided Argument","From the SCOTUSblog Team","Newsletter","Opinion Analysis"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67","name":"Unending oral arguments - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-26T13:14:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=67#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Unending oral arguments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=67"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=67"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}