{"id":77,"date":"2026-05-27T13:11:34","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T13:11:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77"},"modified":"2026-05-27T13:11:34","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T13:11:34","slug":"more-redistricting-drama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77","title":{"rendered":"More redistricting drama"},"content":{"rendered":"

On May 27, 1935, the Supreme Court struck down three of President Franklin D. Roosevelt\u2019s signature New Deal policies. The day came to be known as Black Monday, and it helped spark Roosevelt\u2019s (unsuccessful) push to expand the court.<\/p>

Read more Court sides with Trump administration in dispute over immigration judges, declines to hear Florida suit against other states over immigrant driver\u2019s licenses<\/a><\/p>

At the Court<\/h2>

The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with the Trump administration in a dispute over immigration judges\u2019 speaking engagements, declined to serve as the court of first review in Florida\u2019s challenge to other states\u2019 policies on driver\u2019s licenses for immigrants, and denied a few notable petitions for review. For more on Tuesday\u2019s , see the Morning Reads and On Site sections below.<\/p><\/div><\/div>

The court has indicated that it may announce opinions on Thursday at 10 a.m. EDT. We will be live blogging that morning beginning at 9:30.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Morning Reads<\/h2>

Court Rejects Alabama House Map, Calling It Unfair to Black Voters<\/h3>

Emily Cochrane and Abbie VanSickle, The New York Times<\/svg><\/span><\/p>

\u201cA panel of federal judges on Tuesday rejected Alabama\u2019s effort to use a new voting map for the November midterm elections, saying that the districts discriminated against Black people and could not be used so shortly before a vote,\u201d according to The New York Times. The Supreme Court had sent the dispute over Alabama\u2019s map back to the panel for another look in light of the court\u2019s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais<\/em>, which \u201csets a high standard to challenge maps for race discrimination.\u201d \u201cThe lower court judges made clear that they had reviewed the arguments through the lens of\u201d Callais<\/em> \u201cbut maintained that the state\u2019s map failed under the new standard by intentionally discriminating against Black voters.\u201d \u201cAlabama\u2019s attorney general, Steve Marshall, announced in a court filing Tuesday afternoon that he would immediately appeal to the Supreme Court.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

South Carolina Senate blocks redistricting plan in blow to Trump<\/h3>

Julia Mueller, The Hill<\/p>

After the Supreme Court released its Callais<\/em> ruling, \u201cRepublicans in the South Carolina state House voted … to approve new congressional lines,\u201d according to The Hill. But on Tuesday, state senators blocked the House plan, \u201cputting a pin in the state\u2019s GOP-led redistricting push amid the national back-and-forth ahead of the midterms.\u201d \u201cI can no longer support the passage of this bill for one simple reason: South Carolina citizens are going to the polls today,\u201d Republican state Sen. Richard Cash said in a press release. \u201cNeither my conscience nor common sense will allow me to stop an election that has already begun.\u201d The Hill noted that \u201cTuesday\u2019s move effectively blocks the plan from further action before the midterms, but the state Senate could pick the matter up again next session.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Supreme Court rejects Michigan police officer’s bid to toss out an excessive force claim from a George Floyd protest<\/h3>

Lawrence Hurley, NBC News<\/p>

On Tuesday, the court announced that it will not weigh in on \u201ca Michigan police officer\u2019s attempt to evade an excessive force claim arising from an incident that took place during a protest in the aftermath of the George Floyd killing,\u201d according to NBC News. Sean Hart sued officer Phillip Reinink after being hit and injured by a tear gas canister that was \u201cdesigned to be fired into the air,\u201d not toward protesters. Reinink contends that the suit should be barred by the \u201clegal doctrine of qualified immunity, which often protects police officers from civil rights claims alleging they violated individuals\u2019 constitutional rights.\u201d As a result of the Supreme Court\u2019s decision, a May 2025 ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit holding that Hart\u2019s case against Reinink can proceed will remain in place. \u201cTwo conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, noted they would have ruled in favor of Reinink.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Supreme Court rejects NFL’s bid to step into coach Brian Flores’ racial discrimination suit<\/h3>

Melissa Quinn, CBS News<\/p>

In early 2022, coach Brian Flores filed a \u201clandmark racial discrimination lawsuit\u201d against the NFL and three of its teams, alleging that \u201cthe league had discriminated against him and other Black coaches based on their race and denied them coaching and general manager positions.\u201d Soon thereafter, the suit expanded to include two other coaches and additional teams. \u201cIn response to the lawsuit, the NFL and teams sought to compel arbitration based on the coaches\u2019 employment contracts and a provision of the NFL Constitution that gives the NFL commissioner, [Roger] Goodell, authority to arbitrate disputes between coaches and member clubs,\u201d according to CBS News. A federal judge and then the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit sided in part with the league and in part with the coaches, holding that some of Flores\u2019 claims could move forward in federal court. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court denied the NFL\u2019s request for it to review the 2nd Circuit\u2019s ruling, clearing the way for part of the case \u201cto move forward in open court instead of arbitration.\u201d<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Supreme Court Clerk Hiring Watch: Feeder Frenzy<\/h3>

David Lat, Original Jurisdiction <\/svg><\/span><\/p>

In a post for his Substack, David Lat offered an update on Supreme Court clerk hiring. Among the takeaways is that Yale Law School, the University of Chicago Law School, Stanford Law School, the University of Notre Dame Law School, and Harvard Law School \u201csent the most grads to coveted clerkships in 2025\u201d (based on a percentage of the class, rather than the raw number of clerks). (The actual names of the latest hires are behind Original Jurisdiction\u2019s paywall.)<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

On Site<\/h2>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

Court sides with Trump administration in dispute over immigration judges, declines to hear Florida suit against other states over immigrant driver\u2019s licenses <\/h3>

By Amy Howe<\/p>

The Supreme Court on Tuesday morning reversed a ruling by a federal appeals court that had revived a dispute over a policy governing speaking engagements by immigration judges. In a list of orders from the justices\u2019 private conference last week, the court also declined to serve as the court of first review for Florida\u2019s contention that California and Washington are allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain commercial driver\u2019s licenses.<\/p>

Read more How Callais broke the Voting Rights Act and weaponized the equal protection clause: part 1<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
From the SCOTUSblog Team<\/span>

The Supreme Court\u2019s drug test<\/h3>

By Kelsey Dallas<\/p>

The Supreme Court is expected to rule soon in United States v. Hemani, a closely watched case addressing drug users\u2019 gun rights. When it does, the ruling will likely reignite not just the debate over how the court approaches the Second Amendment, but also the debate over how justices rule in cases involving drugs, and whether they apply a different standard in such cases.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SCOTUS Outside Opinions<\/span>

How Callais broke the Voting Rights Act and weaponized the equal protection clause: part 1<\/h3>

By Issa Kohler-Hausmann & Kevin Z. Yang<\/p>

Much of the reporting on Louisiana v. Callais suggests the court stopped short of finding Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (which prohibits racial discrimination in voting) unconstitutional. According to Issa Kohler-Hausmann and Kevin Z. Yang, Callais did something far more extreme: it rewrote the VRA, and in doing so, made vote-dilution claims impossible.<\/p><\/div>

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Podcasts<\/h2>
Advisory Opinions<\/span>

SCOTUS Through the Decades | Interview: Nina Totenberg<\/h3>

Sarah Isgur and David French discuss an anticlimactic DIG from the Supreme Court over IQ tests and the death penalty, as well as challenges to the Trump administration\u2019s $1.8 billion slush fund on weaponization. Plus, they talk with NPR\u2019s Nina Totenberg about covering the Supreme Court.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Ask Amy<\/h3><\/div>

On Tuesday’s , Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recused herself from the decision whether to grant review in U.S.\u00a0Conference of Catholic Bishops v. O’Connell<\/em>, citing “prior judicial service.\u201d But on the same day, Justice Samuel Alito recused himself in Union Carbide Corp. v. Sommerville<\/em> without providing any explanation. Are the justices required to explain their decisions to recuse themselves and, if not, why do some do so but not others?<\/strong><\/p>

The justices are not required\u00a0to explain why they do not participate in a particular case, although some do, as this example from Jackson \u2013 who served on the district and appeals courts in Washington, D.C., for nine years before joining the Supreme Court \u2013 illustrates. Justice Elena Kagan, who served as the U.S. solicitor general for a year before she was confirmed to the court, also often attributes her recusals to “prior government service.”<\/p>

In an appearance at the SCOTUSblog Summit last fall, Justice Amy Coney Barrett discussed the reasons why the justices might not want to explain why they are recusing. She noted that sometimes the decision to recuse can also affect (and bring attention to) a justice’s friend or family member. As a result, she said, she was inclined to err on the side of not providing any explanations, because you “don’t know what might arise in the future.”<\/p><\/div><\/div>

SCOTUS Quote<\/h2>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cWell, so, if there is one State that would not have an adequate remedy for any \u2013 any single bad thing that could happen in prison, there’s a Bivens<\/em> action for everybody for everything? Is that what you’re saying?\u201d<\/p>

Read more The Supreme Court\u2019s drug test<\/a><\/p>

MR. PREIS: \u201cYes, Your Honor, we are.\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cWow.\u201d<\/p>

MR. PREIS: \u201cI think if the Court were to write an opinion in that case \u2013\u201d<\/p>

JUSTICE SCALIA: \u201cI certainly wouldn’t want to hold that.\u201d<\/p>

(Laughter.)<\/p>

MR. PREIS: \u201cI’m not surprised that you wouldn’t want to hold that, Your Honor.\u201d<\/p>

(Laughter.)<\/p>

JUSTICE BREYER: \u201cI would find that rather surprising, too, actually.\u201d<\/p>

\u2014 (2011) <\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plus, Amy answers a question about recusal decisions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advisory-opinions","category-from-the-scotusblog-team","category-newsletter"],"yoast_head":"\nMore redistricting drama - American Service Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"More redistricting drama - American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plus, Amy answers a question about recusal decisions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Service Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-27T13:11:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/a041389e1354070afd52dd278317991c.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1333\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"headline\":\"More redistricting drama\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-27T13:11:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77\"},\"wordCount\":1607,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Advisory Opinions\",\"From the SCOTUSblog Team\",\"Newsletter\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77\",\"name\":\"More redistricting drama - American Service Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-27T13:11:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?p=77#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"More redistricting drama\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"American Service Review\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/americanservicereview.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"More redistricting drama - American Service Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"More redistricting drama - American Service Review","og_description":"Plus, Amy answers a question about recusal decisions.","og_url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77","og_site_name":"American Service Review","article_published_time":"2026-05-27T13:11:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":1333,"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/a041389e1354070afd52dd278317991c.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"headline":"More redistricting drama","datePublished":"2026-05-27T13:11:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77"},"wordCount":1607,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","articleSection":["Advisory Opinions","From the SCOTUSblog Team","Newsletter"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77","name":"More redistricting drama - American Service Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-27T13:11:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/803a164f9e7307fb35e1310eb4a0b4fe.jpg","width":1200,"height":627},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?p=77#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"More redistricting drama"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/","name":"American Service Review","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/#\/schema\/person\/220bfdac1627513926924476de32dedb","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/americanservicereview.com"],"url":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=77"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=77"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=77"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/americanservicereview.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=77"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}